Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

my neighbour has crashed into my parked car and is denying it... what can i do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 weeks ago i came home from work to find a big dent in my car wing. on looking around it was obvious that it had to be from a car reversing out of the alleyway opposite to where the car was parked. looked around and hey presto my neighbours car which is always parked down there had a nice clean patch on the rear drivers side bumper and a new scratch. she's hit my car, then cleaned all the evidence from her car, then just hoped i wouldn't figure out who it was. the police are useless and wont do anything without witnesses even tho the officer involved said it couldn't have been anyone but her. I am 3rd party insured with no legal assistance, my insurance wont do anything. theres no real damage to her car, its a bloody range rover and she's hit me with the most solid part of her car!

 

she's avoiding me. i've called, knocked on the door, left 3 letters spelling out that i know it was her, including photographs showing the only part of her car that was clean that day was the part that hit me... and nothing! the evidence is staring her in the face, i know she's done it but in the absence of any witnesses to the accident i appear to be up the creek without a paddle.... is there any action i could take here?

 

what can i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your stuffed here, without much chance of being able to prove it was her for sure. Unless there are any CCTV recordings or witnesses that suddenly become available. You could post a note through other neighbours doors, just stating that your car was damaged on x date between the hour of x, asking if anyone was witness to this to come forward. Don't put anything on such a note about who might or might not be responsible, as this could be libelous.

 

If you can't get any CCTV footage or witnesses, what you could do is apply some pressure to the neighbour. Send her a recorded delivery letter (so you have record of posting/receipt) headed 'letter before action', basically advising her that you are holding her responsible for damage to your car on x date between x hours and will be taking this matter to court. Send her details of the cost of the repair and advise her that unless she settles the amount within (say) 21 days or admits liability in writing and provides details of her Insurance policy, you will be left with no alternative.

 

Without CCTV or witnesses, all you have is circumstantial evidence and you would be wasting time taking this to court. If she does not reply to the letter you should stop, as you don't want to be accussed of harassment and have the Police knock on your door.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Unlcebulgaria in that you are stuffed without good contemporaneous evidence.

 

Do the LBA and she is legally obliged to give you her insurance details. If she doesn't then send her a letter stating that as per Section 154 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 if she does not give you her insurance details then you will be informing the police of the breach of the regulations. It is possible that once you are in contact with her insurers they may make an economic settlement to you as even if they instruct solicitors and win at court, it is still likely to cost them more than paying for the damage to your vehicle - although I still think you may be wasting your time...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice guys... having written 3 letters to her already i think theres not much point in trying to pressure her more as she'll just ignore it like the others. I blocked her car in the alleyway this morning with my car, so she rang and spoke to me to ask me to move it. she denied it strenuously but when i asked her to explain why her rear bumper was clean that day she hung up!

 

unfortunately as much as I'd like to do something about it I am bound by my morals to act within the law. bum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threaten her with court and ask her for her Insurance details re the above. Getting the letter by recorded may prompt a change of attitude.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 154 of the Road Traffic Act 1988:

 

154 Duty to give information as to insurance or security where claim made. E+W+S

(1)A person against whom a claim is made in respect of any such liability as is required to be covered by a policy of insurance under section 145 of this Act must, on demand by or on behalf of the person making the claim

(a)state whether or not, in respect of that liability—

(i)he was insured by a policy having effect for the purposes of this Part of this Act or had in force a security having effect for those purposes, or

(ii)he would have been so insured or would have had in force such a security if the insurer or, as the case may be, the giver of the security had not avoided or cancelled the policy or security, and

(b)if he was or would have been so insured, or had or would have had in force such a security—

(i)give such particulars with respect to that policy or security as were specified in any certificate of insurance or security delivered in respect of that policy or security, as the case may be, under section 147 of this Act, or

(ii)where no such certificate was delivered under that section, give the following particulars, that is to say, the registration mark or other identifying particulars of the vehicle concerned, the number or other identifying particulars of the insurance policy issued in respect of the vehicle, the name of the insurer and the period of the insurance cover.

(2)If without reasonable excuse, a person fails to comply with the provisions of subsection (1) above, or wilfully makes a false statement in reply to any such demand as is referred to in that subsection, he is guilty of an offence.

 

Hope this helps...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would try something completely different. Get hold of a CCTV camera and pop it up when you know she is not there. Nothing loud, just a small camera that does not stand out. Then, write one last time and point out that failing to stop after an accident is a criminal offence and if she does not provide her insurance details within 7 days you will take the footage from your CCTV camera (which overlooks the alleyway) to the police. The fact that there is no footage of the incident is for you to know. If I were her I would buckle after popping outside and seeing that there actually is a CCTV camera pointed straight at the alleyway.

 

The other alternative is to report the accident to your insurers providing her as the third party. Just her name, address and vehicle details. She would have to respond to any claim otherwise the claim could be settled in default against her. Any accident investiagator will see what actually happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately my house does not look over the alleyway so the CCTV claim is not an option.

 

When she's been presented with evidence (photographs posted with a letter, showing a nice clean bit on the rear drivers bumper but the rest of the car hasn't been washed in weeks) and challenged on it when i spoke to her she's just hung up on me. the only reason i got to speak with her in the first place is because i blocked her car in the alleyway. i won't be doing that again for obvious reasons but i will write the lba.

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting development. received a call from her b/f last night. luckily i recorded it. basically they're saying i cost them money because i bloced her in (she wasnt properly blocked in, she got out and was at work 15/20 mins late). accusing me of harassment even tho i've only spoken to her twice on the issue. said if i ever did it again i'd cause more trouble than i know. I said I wouldn't block her in again, and I'm not going to because I only did it so she would speak to me. every time I asked about the mystery clean patch on the car the convo was diverted he said several times that i couldn't prove it. he accused me of doing it because there's damage on the wing mirror that was on the car when i bought it! then i was getting irate and was telling him the policeman said it was her, he told to write to her and see what happened, he didnt tell me to block her car in but i thought what the hell as i'd heard nothing from her...

 

he then said i'd said the policeman told me to do it and he's gonna call the police and tell them what i said.. clearly this Neanderthal is trying to bully me, i dont expect to hear from the police on this matter. the recording is clear as day, i clearly said the policeman didnt tell me to block her in.

 

I can't believe the nerve of these people, accusing me of harassment when i've spoken to her twice about the matter.

 

any thoughts guys?

 

thinking about getting a solicitor to the the lba. I'm quite sure she wont provide her insurance details, or answer the letter.

 

i need opinions, as I'm unsure what the best course of action is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget about it, as you cannot prove anything and they are not going to admit anything. Keep a copy of the call, just in case anything happens. You could report her b/f for threatening you, by asking the Police to listen to the call. But I think the Police have better things to be doing.

 

You could speak to a solicitor, but I think they may advise you same.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA then small claims court. You have evidence, don't let them get away with it!

 

As mentioned, they LEGALLY have to give you their insurance details. Its upto the insurance company to decide what to do next.

By day, computer and mobile phone technical support... by night home mechanic and Rover / MG enthusiast!

 

Cars: 1998 Rover 620ti

Computers: HP nc8430 Business Notebook, Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dunno, to be honest the way they've handled it from the outset should have told me i was wasting my time. its a shame, but i dont think i can be bothered with the hassle. live life be happy and all that. its too much stress, i don't like to roll over but i think i've got to admit i've tried and failed. the photo is just circumstntial and it would just be my luck that they'd fight it and win. i guess this is a lesson learned about how the law works in the uk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very similar, but in Tesco car park. They gave me their home address but refused to give me insurance details.

 

An LBA later and I had £200 in my bank.

By day, computer and mobile phone technical support... by night home mechanic and Rover / MG enthusiast!

 

Cars: 1998 Rover 620ti

Computers: HP nc8430 Business Notebook, Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Do the lba. Don't use a solictor as it will cost you a lot, but do send it by recorded delivery. If she does not provide you with her insurance details then she has broken the law and you can persue that - at this point she cannot ignore you, she may stall but she has to give you her insurance details.

 

The next step is to contact her insurance company. You have a lot more influence here as their insurance company will not want to waste time dealing with you over some minor damage. It's not guaranteed but you may get lucky and they will just pay out the claim to prevent escalating costs. It will also count as a fault claim against her. If she continues to deny it and her insurance company backs her then you can go as far as to take it to court and get her to testify as to what happened under oath. No way to prove she isn't lying at this point, but hopefully the pressure of committing perjury will make her see sense. You could do the same through the small claims court but that will cost you, whereas going through her insurance company won't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only problem being the £300 excess that you have to pay if it goes on an untraced claim

 

But it may not be so. It is quite apparent from the OP's account that the neighbour was involved so the MIB will simply claim from their insurers.

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...