Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Confused about fraud!!!


xJTx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently been called into the job centre on suspicion of benefit fraud (they claimed I was living with someone, I’m not)

During the interview I was asked about my home life, visitors/overnight guests/relationships.

I explained I am receiving a lot of outside help from my family and my kids dad recently as my child has just been registered disabled and I’m finding it a bit difficult to cope.

I said if I’ve had more help than was expected and have done something wrong then I’m sorry and would like to know how to fix it…. To which the investigator replied “you need to sit down with the man in question and talk about him moving back in and signing off benefits”…. that’s the only answer I received the 3 times I asked.

They said they had evidence of a couple of pictures of me and this man kissing (put on facebook many years ago) and they’d watched my house for a month and had seen him coming and going, although they wouldn’t give me any dates or times or show me all these many records they had…. Even though they expected me to answer why he was there at that time.

I am not looking for free money and if I have done something wrong I will hold my hands up and pay back anything I owe.

What I don’t understand is how they can question me on evidence that I was not shown and conclude my only way out is to live with a man I no longer love or want to be with.

Can anybody help me understand what happens next? Will my claim be stopped or will they try to push me and my ex into living together? I’m so confused :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The people who interview you are not the people who make the decision. Sounds to me like they have indicators of fraud but nothing concrete and are looking for an admission. At an IUC, they will show you evidence where they have it. Did they show you anything at all? Any documentary evidence? Did they show you the surveillance that they say they have? The photos?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, sorry mine are so long winded, I just want to make sure I give as much information as possible.

 

They read a comment Id wrote on my ex’s facebook page that said about his "sitting on his a**e whilst I did everything* They didn’t let me see the quote or I could have explained it (as I later looked on his page and saw it was said the day before our daughters birthday) but they claimed that it was proof he lived here as he was expected to do things around the home.

The surveillance was dates and times on a sheet of paper. It was said to have been done over a 4 week period but they didn’t tell me which 4 weeks or show/state to me any dates/times. The closest I got to an explanation was "we've seen him coming and going late evening/early morning. Suggesting he goes to/from work to your home"

There was nothing said about photos.

I’m starting to get really worried now as I have now received a letter telling me my payments of council tax and housing benefit have been suspended until I inform them of my change of circumstances regarding living with someone.

I really am at a loss as to how we are going to cope once my income support, tax credits, disability living allowance, child benefit and carers allowance stop (which I assuming will happen in the near future)

I am trying to use any money I do have now to get shopping and pay bills (or anything that will be cut off) but I’m at a loss as to what will happen in the long run.

As I have said they advised I sign off income support and inform all other benefits that my ex has moved back in, correcting the status of the money I do have coming in, but I really don’t want him back.

He’s happy where he is now and (up until a week ago) I was happy with my situation, I really don’t want to move backwards after finally finding my feet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA, CA and CB are not affected by income from a partner so there is little to worry about in regard to those benefits. It's surprisingly easy how you can sort the issue in regard to benefits which would be affected. You write in providing evidence that the person they alledge is living with you, is not living with you. first get in touch with the council, confirm that there is no change of circumstances; there has been suspicion by DWP but your circumstances have not changed, and you have told them as much. As you are on relatively good terms with this person, ask him to provide documents which would support your case. Documents which show him living at another address:

 

  • Council tax bill in his name
  • Lease/mortgage of his home in his name
  • Utility bills sent to his address in his name
  • any other documents - DVLA docs, bank statements (with transactions blanked out if he wishes), contracts for phone or other services etc, employment contract.
  • Statements from neighbours if they know you well, and the ex himself if he was not investigated and is prepared to write a statement
  • If any professionals were involved who knew you were not a couple - Dr's, Solicitors, public office employee of management level, teachers etc, they could also write statements in support of your case
  • Evidence of child support payments to show he was maintaining the children as a non resident parent

All of these documents should sufficiently demonstrate that he maintains his own home and does not live with you. If he doesn't want you to see these documents, he can send them in himself, with a covering letter which makes it clear what they relate to. The letter should include things which identify you as the person being investigated so that they can match it with your case. Best would be your National Insurance number but they can also match it to your name, address and date of birth.

 

They can only suspend your benefit if the question giving rise to the suspension is supported by clear, genuine evidence. As a single parent with children, they must also seriously consider whether suspension of payments would place you in hardship or adversely affect your children.

 

There is more on suspension here

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much, that’s really helpful.

 

The stupid thing is that although the jobcentre has notified the local council of the investigation (causing them to suspend my claim) The jobcentre hasn’t (as yet) suspended my IS.

 

I'll get onto the council Monday morning and hopefully get it sorted ASAP.

Thanks again for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got your housing benefit/council tax benefit decision notice? On it, it should give a breakdown of the award. If you get it passported/linked (you get it because you get income support) they should reinstate while you are still in receipt of income support.

 

Tell them you have had an interview, it's suspicion but nothing more, you are still receiving IS, there has been no alteration to your circumstances, and that you would like them to reinstate the benefits.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, I don’t have the notice but will contact them and enquire.

I have contacted the bank and checked dates all benefits were made.

According to the letter the council sent HA and CTB were both stopped on the 30th Sept (my IUC was on 29th Sept) yet I was still paid IS on 1st Oct.

I have all the shown on a bank statement so will show the council and hopefully get it all sorted.

I’ve not received any letters from the council asking me to attend any form of IUC with them so have to assume they have stopped HB and CTB due to the IUC I had with the jobcentre.

Hopefully they will give me any answers either way and settle this before I end up oweing them hundreds of pounds in arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again, I have finally managed to talk to the right person at the council today (every time I contacted them I was informed it was the fraud investigators I needed not the benefits section)

They have told me they have looked on file and are unable to reinstate my benefits until my IS has been reinstated (I hadn’t even been made aware that it had been stopped)

What do I do now? I have some money to tide me over.... my sons back payment of DLA (which I was hoping to save to take him on holiday) but it is only £400 and with my rent and council tax being nearly £100 a week I know by the end of the month I’m going to be behind on everything.

Any advice on what I can do next would be fantastic.

I have spoken to my ex and he hasn’t any paper work to help (as he was staying at different family members homes) but has mail going to his mothers address, my mothers address and my address.

He has recently found a room to rent local to me which all his bills will be going to, but I have now been accused of arranging this as we'd been caught (during the IUC, as I said I have heard nothing since then)

I pay everything in this house, the rent and council tax were covered by benefits, but water was paid out of my IS, the gas, electric and TV licence are in my name but they are still convinced he lives here.

I’m so worried, I have a work focused interview on Thursday, but am embarrassed about going knowing I'll be sitting there with them thinking I’m a criminal.

Please help, many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I’m hoping someone can help.

I had an IUC in Sept as they thought my husband, who I split from in 2006 and I were living together.

I explained that he'd been spending more time at my home recently due to my son being diagnosed with autism and would stay on Friday and Saturday nights to spend time with the kids (giving me a break) as he didn’t have anywhere to take the children to (he was, at the time NFA)

It was then the turn of my ex to go in and we were both told a 2nd interview may be required.

I was totally straight with every question and hoped they would see I was just in need of extra help with my son, nothing more.

I didn’t hear anything for 10 weeks after the interview, my income support went unchanged, although my HB and CTB were both suspended.

I have recently been invited to attend a 2nd interview (which Id expected) What’s confusing is why my ex hasn’t been. Is this a good sign or am I likely to walk in there to find I’m lined up to be prosecuted, regardless of being innocent and telling them everything in detail?

Can someone please help, I’m so worried and dreading Tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A second IUC is normally arranged at the direction of either the fraud manager or the decision maker, where they feel more clarification is required before a decision can be made, or where further evidence has come to light that they need to ask you about. You can't be prosecuted as yet because no decision on fraud has been made, let alone the case having been considered by departmental solicitors.

 

I would however advise you to take legal representation with you this time, if you are able to. It sounds to me that are they are out for an admission, especially as the "evidence" they have so far is sketchy and being taken out of context. Either that, or there is more evidence they want to question you about.

 

Are there no people who would write statements in support of the fact that you were not a couple for the period in question?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

I’ve now been for my 2nd interview and also had an interview at the local council (regarding HB and CTB)

I have not received a decision as such (in writing) but have spoken to the interviewing officer from the DWP who has informed me a decision notice is on its way to me and I have been found guilty of fraud during the 2 years that my ex was of NFA.

Could anyone tell me what happens next? I did ask at the council when I had my interview and she said as I’d been found guilty for a 2 year period that the amount I received in overpayment would be too high to be expected to pay it back and I would now be expected to go to court for them to make a decision on what happens next.

Could someone please give me an honest answer (no matter how bad) so I can prepare myself (and arrange childcare for my children) Am I going to prison for this??

Please help, I’m beyond terrified.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the overpayment is over £2,000 they do tend to prosecute, there are a few threads in here that have got to that stage now. Worth a read.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't been found guilty of fraud, they are prosecuting you for fraud. That doesn't mean you are guilty. Only a court will decide that. A friend of mine is going through court at the moment, he is pleading not guilty. His over payment has dropped from 10k to 1k now since they took into account certain things, but he wasn't guilty, & he wont plead guilty!

I suggest you find a benefit solicitor, not a solicitor that just gives general advice in it, but a solicitor that specialises in it.

You'll probably get legal aid. You need to be strong now & fight this.

x

Sorry forgot to add, your very very unlikely to go to prison so stop thinking about that!

Edited by jadeybags
Link to post
Share on other sites

What they are saying is that they have decided that you committed fraud. A court has not yet decided and you can still plead "not guilty" if or when you are summonsed to court. You have a right of appeal against the decision that the fraud investigation service have reached. As you were not living with your husband, I would strongly encourage you to appeal. You may be able to get help with an appeal via Welfare Rights or CAB - but make sure you appeal within the time limit set of one month from the date of the decision.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help everyone, honestly I could not have got through without everyone’s replies.

I’m going to speak to a solicitor ASAP and hopefully find out more about how much this overpayment is too (I need to know what I’m dealing with)

I have to know what’s going on, I want to believe I'll be ok, but cant fight the thought I may end up in prison.

I’m terrified. I’ve looked at many other cases and keep coming across people being made examples of.

Does anyone know what I should expect when I go to court (I’ve given up on believing it could be an if) Will it be like you see on TV, standing in a dock, being questioned whilst a jury watch my every move?

Also could anyone tell me if this will end up in the papers (I’m thinking the local news, not implying I’m important enough to be interesting to many folk)

I just worry how this could affect my kids.

I know my biggest fear should be, and is, not ending up in prison, but I also would like to know how to protect my kids from the backlash of this all.

So far they know nothing (apart from my eldest telling my mum I never smile anymore, but we pass that off as me being tired as my youngest is a poor sleeper) but I don’t know how I could stop her knowing if I hit the papers.

Oh god, this is all such a mess, I just want to run away.

Any help and advice would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Real courts are very seldom the dramatised versions you see on TV. There may not be a jury - it depends what type of court your case is heard in. A defendant is not required to testify but you may do so if you wish or if your counsel feels that it is in your best interests to.

 

Prison is always a last resort for sentencing these days - and, as you are innocent I would hope the court would find you as such. A decision made by DWP is based in civil law where the standard of proof is low - "on the balance of probability". They will refer the case to the prosecution division who will decide whether to bring the case to criminal court. They will only do so if they believe they have a reasonable prospect of success in securing a prosecution, and it is in the public interest to do so. Believing that they have a chance of success and actually succeeding are two different things though. In criminal proceedings, the standard of proof is much higher than a balance of probability - the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt". If there is any reasonable doubt in the mind of the magistrate or jury (depending on whether it is a magistrate or crown court) then they must not convict. The burden of proof is also on the prosecution. It is up to them to prove that you commited fraud, not on you to prove that you did not.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help everyone, honestly I could not have got through without everyone’s replies.

I’m going to speak to a solicitor ASAP and hopefully find out more about how much this overpayment is too (I need to know what I’m dealing with)

I have to know what’s going on, I want to believe I'll be ok, but cant fight the thought I may end up in prison.

I’m terrified. I’ve looked at many other cases and keep coming across people being made examples of.

Does anyone know what I should expect when I go to court (I’ve given up on believing it could be an if) Will it be like you see on TV, standing in a dock, being questioned whilst a jury watch my every move?

Also could anyone tell me if this will end up in the papers (I’m thinking the local news, not implying I’m important enough to be interesting to many folk)

I just worry how this could affect my kids.

I know my biggest fear should be, and is, not ending up in prison, but I also would like to know how to protect my kids from the backlash of this all.

So far they know nothing (apart from my eldest telling my mum I never smile anymore, but we pass that off as me being tired as my youngest is a poor sleeper) but I don’t know how I could stop her knowing if I hit the papers.

Oh god, this is all such a mess, I just want to run away.

Any help and advice would be gratefully received.

 

I am aware of a case in 1988 where a guy pleaded guilty on advice from his solicitor, but wasn't guilty. He was told that the risk of being found guilty in Crown Court would be worse for him than pleading guilty but still innocent????

The amount involved was £12,000 over an 18 month period. Council Tax Benefit, Supplementary Benefit and Unemployment Benefit combined.

 

He was sent to prison for 12 months. He had never been in trouble in his life.

When he came out he appealed against the £12,000 overpayment and went to the Commissioners. He won there as he proved that he had NOT made any profit in a little business he was trying to start off and only worked for a couple of hours a week for the first 2 years. The evidence on his side was clear cut - the Inland Revenue had also carried out an investigation and it showed that he had NO income.

 

So he didn't have to repay any of the £12,000, but still went to prison and was in there for 9 months.

 

On the day of the trial, it was reported on the ITV News, the BBC News and all of the local and most of the national papers.

 

Ironically, the law was changed when Income Support replaced Supplementary Benefit. He would not have been prosecuted today as you are allowed to deduct expenses from self employed income and only need to disclose the net figure. Previously, they assessed you on the gross income even if the expenses incurred came to more than it !!

 

As an example if your gross income was £500 they would have reduced your benefit by this figure. They wouldn't have taken into account that it cost £490 in expenses and stock to earn it. Their argument was that the person would be daft to work in a business that only earned £10 for every £500 of sales.

Edited by SueP1944
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, just a quick update.

I have now (finally) received a letter from the job centre saying that they have found I was overpaid for a (near) 4 week period (just before my first IUC) and I owe them just short of £200.

I called the number that was on the letter to enquire into how they'd come to this

decision and was told the decision was being dealt with in 2 half’s.... but they don’t know why (I’ve had a think and nothing at all happened in those last 3 weeks to make it any more/less important than the 1st 2 years)

They said the decision I had received had been made in Nov 2010 (2 months before my 2nd interview) but the rest of the time was still pending decision.

Do I go ahead and appeal this decision now or do I wait until my next decision comes through the door (remembering the last one took 5 months to be posted)

I’m more worried than ever. I really cant take anymore. I’ve given up even trying to eat or sleep, I just sit on here all night reading anything I can find that sounds similar to my case.

I have no idea what to do, I used to work in a prison and the thought of being left to rot in one scares the hell out of me.

My parents are offering to re-mortgage their house in order to pay back all 2 years of money, its affecting my whole family.

Please someone help me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

definitely appeal now, as it can take months for these things to get to tribunal

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will thanks.

Does anyone know if it goes to court every time you appeal?

I’m so worried, if I appeal now and they say I have to pay it back will it not go against me when the rest of the decisions come through and I appeal them?

I cant cope with this, how do people that are knowingly committing fraud ever sleep at night??? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so gutted for you. This sounds awful. Have you not had any income support or housing benefit since last year?!

 

Hi, my income support has never been stopped.

Housing and council tax benefit have been slightly hit and miss... As in they'll be stopped, I'll be asked for proof Im still getting income support, I'll provide it and they'll start paying it again a few weeks later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my income support has never been stopped.

Housing and council tax benefit have been slightly hit and miss... As in they'll be stopped, I'll be asked for proof Im still getting income support, I'll provide it and they'll start paying it again a few weeks later.

 

What a nightmare!

Well I expect the ones knowingly committing fraud dont always fear much in life at all really!

So in theory they are saying you were living with your ex, up until your IUC? As obviously they dont think you are now if your income support hasn't stopped. Honestly, they do need a few points of evidence for a court to find you guilty. But it looks like people are tending to plead guilty in case they are found guilty & then end up getting a worse sentance! It makes me mad.

I know it's hard, because you dont sleep, or eat & that makes you so weak in all ways, but if you can, do appeal it all! If you're not guilty you must!

As I have said on here before I know of someone that was prosecuted for living with someone, amounted to 45k fraudulantly claimed. Her boyfriends family stood up in court & said he had been living with them. She was found not guilty. Last year this was.

The horrible thing is, you wont read about those in the paper, only the ones found guilty! :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 2 different things going on

 

1) have you been overpaid? this is a civil matter which you can appeal to a tribunal over - the tribunal have the power to decide whether you have been overpaid and whether the overpayment is recoverable from you

 

2) have you committed benefit fraud? this is a criminal matter and can go 5 ways off the top of my head: -

a) no case to answer

b) case to answer but no sanction action applied

c) case to answer, caution applied

d) case to answer, administrative penalty applied

e) case to answer, prosection pursued

 

If you win your appeal, the fraud case normally collapses

 

If you lose your appeal, then any of the options in part 2 could be possible, you should bear in mind that whether you are found guilty or not guilty of benefit fraud, you would still owe the overpayment

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...