Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

More Than Pet Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4891 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

My mother in law is having major problems with More Than concerning the renewal of the insurance policy for their eldest dog who has turned 8 years old.

 

She has remained loyal to them throughout and I believe she even has their other dog who is just 2 insured with them as well.

 

When they commenced the policy the monthly premium commenced at £7.99 and has increased annually upto £20.99. This years renewal came through around a month ago at £37.00!!! per month.

 

Now she accepts that the premium would go up a fair but when considering the dogs age but to increase by around 85% is surely unjustiable especially for a customer who has never claimed.

 

She has so far spent a couple of hours on the phone and various points and for my money has been given the run around. Tonights call was to basically give her a sob story about the recession, the cost of drugs and vets bills etc. An apology was offered but nothing else.

 

In addition, my mother in law has been on the website and after inputting the exact same details has been quoted £28.00 per month but been told this is for new customers only and should she opt for this and cancel she'll be uncovered for 14 days which is of course a risk she's not prepared to take.e

 

Of course her next step to send a written complaint and so I was wondering if anyone new either an address or email address for the CEO or Customer Service Director that this can be sent to.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth pursuing the lower premium and complaining that it's not available to existing and loyal customers. I don't know what the rules are offhand and wouldn't necessarily hold my breath. Pet insurance premiums have certainly risen a lot recently, I know.

 

Have you shopped around at all? An 8 year old cat might still be insurable with another company and you could try the supermarkets or other major insurers. Or you could try an insurance broker, who should be in touch with what the market's doing and who's competitive. That way, you would have a second option, assuming you find cover.

 

PS I'd have thought the addresses you're looking for should be on the company's website.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13
PS

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurers will obviously increase the premium to a level which they think is reasonable for the risk they are covering but also because they make more money from those customers who continually renew without shopping around.

 

What you could do is arrange cover elsewhere and then cancel the Morethan policy 14 days later. This would ensure that you don't have a period of 14 days where illness would not be covered. Yes there would be duplicate Insurance for accident, but if anything happened, each Insurer would make a contribution.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input guys.

My mother in law has already dealt with their Customer Relations Dept who weren't much cop. I'll do some more digging around for the CEO details.

Since I posted lastnight she's also received a quote from Sainsburys of £28.00 per month with some added bonuses thrown in.

I reckon she'll be likely to take this and cancel with More Than but still pursue the complaint and the level of service she's received since initially contacting them as been awful.

Will keep you posted.

STM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same issue with More>Than for my (now 8-and-a-bit) year old Labrador.

 

It seems that dogs of over 8 years attract a significantly higher premium than younger animals - for instance, my Lab was quoted at £36+ a month (I saw the renewal, was shocked by it and didn't read any further as this represented an almost 50% hike in premiums) whereas my younger dog (just over a year old) attracted a premium of £26+ a month with the same firm - identical cover for both. This hike for the puppy represented a 100% increase of premium - in both cases there have been no claims in the last 12 months for either animal.

 

I ended up shopping around and got a quote of £22.08 for the Lab and £11.26 for the Staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same issue with More>Than for my (now 8-and-a-bit) year old Labrador.

 

It seems that dogs of over 8 years attract a significantly higher premium than younger animals - for instance, my Lab was quoted at £36+ a month (I saw the renewal, was shocked by it and didn't read any further as this represented an almost 50% hike in premiums) whereas my younger dog (just over a year old) attracted a premium of £26+ a month with the same firm - identical cover for both. This hike for the puppy represented a 100% increase of premium - in both cases there have been no claims in the last 12 months for either animal.

 

I ended up shopping around and got a quote of £22.08 for the Lab and £11.26 for the Staff.

 

Thanks for sharing your experience with them.

 

It does seem that once they get to an age where they feel that there's more chance of them having to pay out for treatment that they increase the premium to such a degree that they'll either make money from people who don't shop around of push those away who do and find it cheaper elsewhere.

 

The Sainsburys deal is even cheaper than I first thought so I'm 99% certain she'll go with that and say adios to More Than.

 

Very sorry yes, dogs - blond moment. We have some of both. I hope you resolve your problem.

 

HB

 

Don't worry about it - it happens to the best of us.

 

I think once she set up with Sainsburys she'll be complaining to More Than regarding the terrible service and asking them to refund the last premium they recently took which I think is the least they can do bearing in mind her loyalty to them over 8 years and the contemptable manner in which they've dealt with a fairly simple complaint.

 

Lets watch this space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth threatening MoreThan by claiming they've breached the Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) proviso of the FSA guidelines for general insurance. This would be in relation to them offering a much higher premium to your mother-in-law for renewal of the same risk than they have offered for new business. This is unjustified - the vast majority of the administrative costs of an insurance policy for an insurer are incurred during new business stage - renewals are where you make your money, hence why underwriters fight to retain profitable business.

 

The beauty of TCF is that the FSA has never really defined it - which is why most insurers are extremely scared of customers threatening to complain under it. The insurance industry is pretty well regulated and takes it all very seriously - unlike the banks, etc!

 

It might not work but if your mother-in-law is going to complain to MoreThan anyway I'd be tempted to include TCF in the complaint.

 

Do let us know how you get on.

 

Best wishes, MC

WOOLWICH -S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 :cool:

LBA sent for non-compliance with Data Protection Act 28/04/07 :mad:

 

ABBEY - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for this.

We're just awaiting a letter from them in order to go through the next stage of their complaints process.

She received a phone call (one of the ones she was promised a few weeks ago) not adding anything further and asked how we could take this further they said they'd send her a letter.

This'll probably take another few weeks at the rate these guys have moved so far - a tactic to suck the energy out of people complaining to them me thinks.

Thanks again and I'll be definitely including this in the letter I'll be helping my mother in law with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well after a few weeks we've now got a further reply from More Than.

The letter in not so many words accuses my mother-in-law of lying about being advised that the premium wouldn't increase my more than rate of inflation and details some of the previous increase which ranged from 10-20% plus.

Now when her premiums were lower even a 20% rise would've made little difference but she did contact them to see if they could offer a better deal and the answer was always pretty much no.

Anyway, after failing once again to sufficiently address their customer service failings together with the TPC proviso they've offered £50.00.

 

Now my mother-in-law isn't too inclined to accept this and is seriously considering referring this to the FOS. If she does would she forfeit the £50.00 or would the worse outcome be that the FOS would say that they feel that this is acceptable and to leave it open for later acceptance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to the FOS won't affect the £50.00 offered now will it cost you any money upfront (although what is never reaslised is this does cost us all in premium increases etc).

What do you want to gain from the complaint? if it's cheaper premiums, that's probably (I could be wrong) not going to happen, the FOS have little power if any over a companies commecial decisions. It's not what their for.

Sorry to be blunt, but the £50.00 is to get rid of you, a company can choose their premium, they can increase for whatever reason they feel, they do not owe you cheaper premiums, nor do you owe them to not go to the next insurer for a cheaper amount. If a discount is offered if bought new, that is not a breach of TCF, it's a discount for a commercial reason, if they have pushed up the price without reason i.e no underwriting critera, the FOS may intervene. Underwriters in my experience always have areason for their figures, their not plucked out of thin air. If they could find reason to offer a cheaper premium it would be offered, if they just didn't want you, they wouldn't offer renewal.

Again sorry to be so harsh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

All I ask for is honest advice so thanks for yours.

I accept that the FOS may be limited to what they can do in regard to the premium side of things here and that the £50 is just a way of making us go away.

The things that annoy her and now me is there utter disregard to acknowledge and explain their customer service failings throughout this matter and failure to address the TCF point. They may believe that they've done nothing wrong but at least give the customer the courtesy of explaining why.

Naturally we have a few months to decide what course of action we'll take so I'll report back once we have an update.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Incidentally, who were these quotes with?

 

Thanks,

 

STM

 

Sorry, not been around here for a while, so just catching up!

 

The pup I got insured with esure and the Lab, in the end, with a company called the "Green Insurance Company". I got both quotes from that famous-site-with-the-annoying-opera-singer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...