Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
    • moved to the debt self help forum. plenty of like threads here to read along with the ones you've done so far..good work. last thing you ever want to do is look at any kind of IVO/BK or anything alike concerning consumer debt, never do that, turns unsecured debts into secured ones in many instances. your best bet for now is p'haps looks at  Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) sadly you have to go thru one of the free debt charities to invoke that but DON'T be tempted to also open up a DMP with them, just get the Breathing Space done. get that in place that gives you at leasy 60 days buffer you've also goto to realise you'll probably get a default once breathing space is in place, bit if not it might pay you to withhold payments even after BS then p'haps re start payments once a DN for each debt is issued and registered. at least that way, whatever happens in 6yrs the debt will drop off dx  
    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Action fraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Summons for one month late!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4983 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I received a summons today from my council for being 1 month late with August' payment. I received no reminder for this payment, just a summons. I have never been in arrears and have always paid my council tax in full every year. Having never been in this position before I am furious at this unnecessary overreaction by the council. Is this normal practice for councils?

 

The charges applied to this summons are also outrageous. £3 court costs and £112 charged by the council!! Unbelievable.

 

I will speak to the council tomorrow and pay the August installment.I would however like the answers to a couple of questions if some kind soul could spare a few minute.

 

Do councils really have the ability to issue a summons for a 'late' August payment before the end of the August month and almost a week before most people are paid? Before any reminder is sent?

 

When I pay tomorrow does the summons go away? and the ridiculous charges?

 

And does this summons have any affect on my credit score or record reporting?

 

Thanks for looking

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do councils really have the ability to issue a summons for a 'late' August payment before the end of the August month and almost a week before most people are paid? Before any reminder is sent?

Normal practice is 1-2 reminders, a final notice and then a summons, and this applies to the entire annual charge, it isn't something that is reset for each individual instalment.

 

I don't know about your council but where I live the charge is due on the 1st of every month. If they haven't received payment by about the 15th then reminders are sent. If you pay that but then are late again next month your account will progress to the next reminder stage, and so on and so forth until a summons is issued. So if you've paid 2-3 instalments late this financial year - after reminders/finals have been issued - then yes, they have the right to summons you for this. However if you haven't received any recovery notices for this year's tax then you need to call them up and ask when reminders have been issued, what instalments they were issued for and when payment for those instalments were received, because they can't issue a summons without having issued previous reminders first.

 

A suggestion regarding paying pay day: if you are paid at the end of each month and your tax is due at the start of the month then you should pay the coming months' CT when you get paid, so you're paying in advance rather than in arrears. This will prevent recovery action against you. If your account were to go to court, saying "I paid it on the 29th because that's when I get paid" won't stand up.

 

When I pay tomorrow does the summons go away? and the ridiculous charges?

If you pay the balance in full then your account is paid for the year and won't go to court. However if you only intend on paying the August instalment and not the rest then the summons still stands. You will alos still be liable for the court fees unless the council agree that the summons should never have been issued - reasons such as your payment crossed with it - in which case the council will remove them.

 

And does this summons have any affect on my credit score or record reporting?

It has no affect on your credit score at all. Don't know what record reporting is but I doubt it.

 

I hope that makes sense, if anything is unclear or you have any more questions then please ask and I will try my best to answer them :)

Edited by Nobnob
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the late response Nobnob but I have been away at short notice.

 

Following some discussions with our bank and the council, some good news emerged.

 

Firstly, the bank mistakenly cancelled our CT DD whilst my wife was cancelling some expired DD's.

 

Secondly, the council admitted they did not send any reminders for any missed instalments (there wern't any apart from August) and have withdrawn the summons and cancelled the fees. They issued a somewhat grudging apology over the phone and I have demanded a letter with all the necessary details listed in it.

 

Thank you for detailed response Nobnob. I now have an understanding on the workings of local authority CT offices.

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are absolutely welcome and I'm glad to hear you got it all sorted. I'm somewhat baffled as to how they managed to issue a summons straight away without having sent any other reminders first, bizarre!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your bafflement must have been the equal of mine when I opened the summons!!

 

The only thing I can think of, and this is pure speculation on my part, is that I know my next door neighbour is having financial difficulties following a break-up and is struggling with her bills. Maybe they punched the wrong door number in. But, like I said, that is purely speculation on my part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I don't know how other councils work, but the one I work for uses specialist software. Your account shows any arrears and a 'status' (amongst a billion other things!) with 'status' referring to the recovery stage that the account is at - annual bill, reminder#1, reminder#2, final notice, summons, liability order, AoE, bailiffs etc etc. When a reminder run is done the system will generate a reminder for any account with an amount under 'arrears' and this then updates the 'status' i.e. from reminder#2 to final notice. If a system similar to this is used at your council then perhaps something went wrong with updating the account status - it skipped straight from annual bill to summons or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...