Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed urgently! Can't cancel my insurance due to a false claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a huge problem. I am a young driver and i have recently been burdened with troubles i do not know how to resolve. A third-party has falsely accused me of being involved in a car incident which took place on a bank holiday Monday at 10:00PM in the fall of May.

This is what happened in chronological order;

 

I woke up one day to find letters from the police at my doorstep. At the moment i thought it would have been a speeding fine or a regulatory driving offense of some sort, and even that would have shocked me. However, i opened the letter to find i was 'involved' in an incident which took place on Ripple road, Barking at 10:00 PM on a bank holiday Monday. Shocked and devastated by the letter, i did not attend college that day in order to resolve the situation. Firstly i rang the police and explained to them i had falsely been accused and what i could do to resolve the problem. They simply told me to write a letter including any evidence i had to support my statement. I did this accordingly and never heard from the police again. I then contacted my insurance company and told them of the situation and then they began to dispute the claim.

 

I remember the bank holiday very well actually, it was a few days before Tottenham Hotspurs final game of the season against Manchester City which took place on the Wednesday. On the date of the incident i have 8 witnesses who can confirm I was at the home the entire day. Likewise, i have witnesses who can confirm the car did not leave the drive the entire week, let alone the day. I have a cheap 2003 Nissan Micra I purchased for around £1000. When i had contacted my insurance company, they did not confirm that the third-party had named a vehicle. Secondly, i supposedly hit into the back of his car with the front right wing of mine. The front right wing of my car happens to be the only part of the car in immaculate condition, there is not even a scratch.

 

I also explained i had no business in the area of the incident which is about a 30-40 minutes drive away from my home. I mean, what would I be doing in such an area at 10:00PM at night. I have no friends, no family and absolutely no logical reason to be in such an area let alone at 10:00PM. I also had a Law lesson at college the next morning at 9:00PM which i attended.

 

The only explanation Ii had in mind was that the third-party may have been fooled by someone using a false number plate identical to mine.

 

 

I am currently preparing myself for University which I will be starting in the fall of September, and in order to help subsidise my studies I have decided to sell my car, thus cancel my insurance policy. However, I was told by my insurance company that i am not allowed to cancel my insurance policy due to an outstanding the claim. I have found a buyer for the car and he wants to purchase the car as soon as possible. However, due to the outstanding claim I am unable to do anything.

 

Therefore I am in desperate need of some advice. I am going through so much stress and financial problems because of someone falsely accusing me of an incident which did not occur. I had to sacrifice revision time for my A-Level exams because of this problem, and 3 months later I am burdened by the same problem. Not only can i not cancel my policy, I am still paying for insurance I should have cancelled 2 months ago because I have been falsely accused. Me and my mother have also rang the insurance company at-least 4 times a day to deal with this, but have had no help.

 

I am in dire straits and in desperate need of help. What can I do to resolve the situation? How can i cancel my policy in time to sell my car? and is there any legal action i can take on the third-party for putting me through such personal and financial stress.

 

Yours sincerely, Dan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dan .......... Not sure why the insurance company will not cancel the insurance. I would have thought that they could calculate what your premium was up to the point you want to cancel it.

 

There is nothing stopping you selling the car. Just ensure you get the details of the person you sell it to, a copy of their driving licence and a copy of a utility bill will evidence the fact that you ensured you did everything to get their real details.

 

Did you write to the Police? Have they given an indication as to any prosecution? Have you the details of the person making the allegations? If not you should ask for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The easiest/quickest way to resolve this, is to get in touch with the 3rd party.

 

If you don't know their contact details, you can send a letter via the Insurers.

 

If you send a letter with the explanation you have given in your post, together with photos of your car, the 3rd party might see straightaway, that it was not your car, they had the accident with. They should then contact their Insurers hopefully, if you tell them to, to make them aware of this.

 

BUT you have to be very carefull. If you do send the picture, make sure they are marked clearly in several places, that these were sent with your covering letter of x date. Just thinking that if the 3rd party was dodgy they might try to use the pictures in some way to support their claim.

 

Also you can't rule out this being a [problem] type claim. If the claim is dodgy, the 3rd party might just go quiet, leaving you in this situation, with a pending claim.

 

At 10pm on the 8th May, it would have been dark by then. Perhaps the 3rd party has written down the registration wrongly or mis-identified the reg.

 

As it stands, if you can't get rid of the claim on your record, you will have to pay the premium up to the renewal. Once and if the matter is sorted out, you might be lucky to get some premium back.

 

Try the contact with the 3rd party first and then if that does not work, take legal advice. Though I am not sure what you could do legally to force the issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, thanks for the helpful replies. I am thinking of taking the matter into my own hands by paying the third-party a visit and explaining the situation to him. I will also get in touch with police again and try get hold of the statement issued by the third-party. However, do you think it would be wise to visit him directly? (my insurer gave me his address)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure you should go direct. However if you do then take a witness. You could also record the encounter as if the 3rd party has never seen you then if comes as a surprise then the question of whether he has seen you ever before could be very interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take photos of the car for your own records, sell the car and then cancel the insurance. Making sure that you have the new purchaser to complete the appropriate 'strip' on the V5c registration document. Then cancel the car insurance policy. The Broker/Insurer MUST cancel the policy then since you no longer have an 'insurable interest' in that vehicle - to offer insurance on the subject vehicle thereafter would be an unlawful contract!

Link to post
Share on other sites

. However, do you think it would be wise to visit him directly? (my insurer gave me his address)

 

Suggest that write to him with pictures of the car. If you provide your contact details, then they will contact you if they want to. If you turn up on the doorstep, you don't know what kind of reaction you might get. You could be met with a violent response.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, so heres the current situation;

 

- My insurance company has sent me a letter confirming my insurance will be cancelled on the 6th of September.

- They have also told me that I will most likely have to pay the remaining premium of around 900£.

- However, contrary to this, I will write them a letter concealing photos of my car and explaining to them that the third party is committing fraud and that I am not taking any liability for any extra suspense other than the cancellation fee of my policy. I will also explain to them that I will happily go to a court of Law and testify my innocence with substantial evidence and claim damages from that third party cockroach.

- I honestly was not involved in any incident, therefore there is absolutely no way I can be proven guilty...If i was not involved, how will the third party gather evidence? good luck to him.

 

What do you think guys? As a Law student I rightfully know i am entitled to claim compensatory damages (i.e; I would have cancelled my policy 2 months ago had it not been for this inconvenience, therefore the damages would be the payment for 2 months). However, the process of going through the courts is expensive and time consuming, which is my only doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just noticed this. Your insurer sold you an Annual Policy. If you are attempting to cancel this and get a refund, the cost of cover rockets due to the shortened period of cover, this is BEFORE there is any hint of a potential claim. Once a claim is noted, the chances of getting a refund go out the window unless the claim is successfully repelled.

 

People make the mistake of thinking that if they ay their cover monthly, and cancel, their commitment ceases. Unfortunately is doesn't, as the insurer will insist the full annual amount is paid before a rebate is calculated, and this can be just a few pounrs knocked off. I'd also advise against confronting the TP. There can be accusations of collusion if you do this, he claims and you share the dividend. I'd leave them to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...