Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Farooq v evri is the judgement you want in.   Do you have a copy of do you want me to upload it again here?
    • I have added the correct format for the court. Country Court ..... as it was on the letter today, other letter had the justice.... . That is on the unredacted copy sent to admins email.   Which Evri judgement, could you give me a steer? Wadhwa one?   It's not in dispute, bar that paragraph you picked up. I was looking at that one, and I do agree it's pointless. Thank you for your help.
    • Firstly, and sorry for not asking earlier but have you submitted your DQ yet?
    • As suggested by JK2054 I'll email Evri to their small claims email address, attaching the label and collection receipt and quoting the Money Claims ref number. Is there anything else in addition to sending the email I should do at this stage? Rgds, J
    • Hi, I'd change justice centre to county court. I also wouldn't be including a telegraph article in the bundle. It doens't prove anything law and you don't have distribution rights on it. I also wouldn't personally break down the exhibits on the index page, normally people have a seperate page for this right before the exhibits. The main index page normally just says Exhibits to WX of [Your Name] or at least that's the format I use/see people here use, although really it makes minimal difference.   I also see that despite referencing several judgements you haven't included the EVRi one   paragraph 46 really needs to go imo it has nothing to do with anything. Your in court to apply the law to your case, not to tell the judge about a newspaper that means nothing to your claim.   I also see you've adopted the issues in dispute/not in dispute, which is also known as a scott schedule. if you are taking this approach, for things not in dispute I would say this needs to be things that are agreed between parties, not things like "There is no dispute that I am happy to supply all this evidence which is included in the court bundle." I would say that issues in dispute is to focus on the aspects of the claim that are in dispute, such as whether liability is limited by insurance or not, so I'd be changing that accordingly.   BF should be along shortly to advise on things.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

child tax credit


Helen2264
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

My child tax credit has been reduced from £52.61 to £48.53 I am on Income Support under ill health at the moment I just wondered if anyone else has had their child tax credit reduced I thought the reductions would only be for people who are working and are receiving £40k or more. Also this week my child tax credit was not paid and when I try to ring the main HM Customs 0845 code number I just keep getting cut off after I was given so many options I tried for two days and then managed to received another number 01355 code and got through straight away to a real person without the machine options how very strange when I told the lady my CTC has been stopped she told me they sent me a letter on the 12th of August telling me they have stopped my CTC I told her I have never received that letter she then just casually reinstate my CTC credit without any hassle I am very confused indeed especially with the main HM Customs 0845 number which one just cannot get through another lady have tried for 2 weeks with the 0845 and has not got through she is now sending a complaint letter also I thought then perhaps with my son reaching 16 yrs of age thats why my CTC stopped but the young mother next door to me her CTC credit has stopped also her son is only 5 yrs old there is something fishy going on.

 

On teletext yesterday I read that in Ireland 8 Irish has been sacked because they were tampering with the benefit of the ethic origins reducing their benefits what on earth is going on. Anyway would love to hear if anyone else child tax credit has been reduced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I can't offer any useful advice but mine was unusually paid late, usually get it on a Friday and got it on the Monday. Trying to phone them to make sure they haven't changed the date without notifying me but keep getting cut off because their lines are too busy. I have landline number 02890538192 which is the alternative to the 0845 number so it doesn't cost a fortune on the mobile. Would you mind sharing the number you got?

 

Thanks

I love CAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I can't offer any useful advice but mine was unusually paid late, usually get it on a Friday and got it on the Monday. Trying to phone them to make sure they haven't changed the date without notifying me but keep getting cut off because their lines are too busy. I have landline number 02890538192 which is the alternative to the 0845 number so it doesn't cost a fortune on the mobile. Would you mind sharing the number you got?

 

Thanks

 

the number I got through straight is 01355 359007 try ringing first thing in the morning if you can like 9.00am because even with this number some people has a long wait for the phone to be answered. i rang at 9.00 on the dot and got through without any hassle.

 

hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...