Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

taken to court by HFC/restons... **case dismissed** now marking CRA file again


whatamess
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 364
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

From what i can see the default is not showing anymore. From Aug 2009 when they gave me the default it just shows 3 in red meaning late payments,

 

Then from for the next 2 years its greyed out to say that no information is available

and then for the last 3 months says 6 in red.

 

How can they do this?

 

Does this mean i get another default so i have to wait another 6 years?

 

 

I already done 2 years of the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not another default now the debt

has been bought the new owner updates

the original entry, the original default

cannot be changed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd, I think you should write to HFCs compliance

manager, and demand an explanation of the entry,

copy the letter to the CRAs and place a notice of

dispute on you credit files.

Out of interest what is the ''start date'' on the entry.?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean ask them why they have removed the default and added arrears in place of it?

 

That start date is 21/2/2001. They placed the default Sept 2009 and only just recently updated my file in Dec with 6 months late.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's odd that this entry does not show a default date???

Get the letters off.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all Long time no speak.

 

Well again HFC are trying to wear me down. My credit file has been updated. They have removed the default and have put that i am 6 months in arrers. This is really annoying as they defualted me 3 years ago.

I wrote to them to ask why they have done this and i am yet to get a reply. In the mean time i have received another letter from a DCA to say my acccount has been passed to them and i need to get in touch in 72 hours. What shall i do? I dont think they will ever leave me alone :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not allowed to change the original date of Default. I think you might need to contact the Information Commissioner regarding this.

 

The case was dismissed wasnt it ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I dont because it is all done on line. But surley they have to default you before they take you to court? And they did take to me to Court so there is no denying that.

 

Sorry to be a bit Dim but who are the ICO and how do i contact them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

and?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you were posting on two threads

i've merged them and retitled

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk. Sorry for the late reply. I called the ICO and they have advised me I have to give them 28 days to reply to my letter. (The letter i sent was to ask why they removed the default and made my account 6 months in arrers.)

 

If i dont hear from them I can make a complaint against the creditor for putting wrongful information on my credit file. Its been 2 weeks since i sent the letter. And in that time i receieved a letter from a DCA.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I need some help with this. I got a letter back from HFC to say they couldnt find the account in my name or address, and the credit file i sent to them does not show the creditors name or my name and address and could i please send the whole credit file so they can answer my querey correctly.

 

1. How can they not find the account in my name and my address? They have been sending letters and took my to court under my married name (not my maiden name when the account was opened).

 

2. I dont really want to send them my whole credit file. I printed this online. So is difficult to get just there info without putting other credit info on with it.

 

Are they just stalling for more time? What Should i do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write back the following

 

"As your company have totally failed to keep proper records and now are asking for information they are not entitled to have I am taking you to court without further notice - I would remind you that defamation claims carry a very high penalty and could cost your company its CCL licence.

 

Details of this case are going to the OFT, Trading Standards, Ministry of Justice, local MP and various newspapers."

 

Keep it short and sharp and they will get the message. They are taking the proverbial here. If they cannot match you with their records then you are clearly not the debtor, the onus of proof is on THEM, not YOU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Again

 

I have had a letter today from a company to say they are acting on behalf of Mackenzie Hall to collect the debt. They are threating with door step calls if i dont contact them. I feel like im going back to basics this is what happend in the begining with HFC they turned up in my door step 3 times. I cant have this again. Any advice. The idiots wont leave me alone even though the case was dismissed in court.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...