Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
    • I emailed both. Tarry's came back "Please note that I have now left the business. Please contact Matthew Barnes ([email protected])  going forward" so will send to him.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - re-mortgage application declined due to adverse credit on experian file***RESOLVED***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4997 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I need some urgent help! I have just been turned down for a re-mortgage today and it has cost me £150. I have been been advised that an adverse payment arrangement is showing on my credit search. They use Experian. The broker did a credit search prior to me sending in the application, discussed my application with a bank rep and I had an offer in principle. He even advised me that the bank wanted me to include some existing credit on my cards in order to proceed with them, so what could have happened?

 

I do have 1 payment arrangement paying a token £1.00 to DCA, but this arrangement has been ongoing for many years and should not show on my credit report as default is 9 years old. I am also dealing with a court claim from Link financial since June 10 for a debt 13 years old, which I am disputing in full as I do not have any particulars of the claim. Could they have made an entry for a 13 year defaulted account?

 

Whatever it is, it certainly wasnt on my CRA until recently, as I have re-mortgaged, applied for a credit card and changed banks in the last 3 years. I dont have any other payment arrangement. I have re-joined Experian today for an on line credit report, but need to wait for security clearance which can take up to 48 hours. (So much for it being instant) I know I need to check what is on my file, but can anyone advise me what should be my next step and do I have a right to refuse to pay the £150 as a credit check was made by the broker and discussed with the bank prior to him telling me I had an offer in principle and then me completing the application form. £150 is required within 7 days.

 

Can anyone advise? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i can find out the £150 is only due if you pull out of the deal (finding a cheaper mortguage) and was bought in to protect both sides.

I have found this statement from the woolwich.

 

"People who apply for a mortgage with the Woolwich and then pull out part way through the process are to be charged a £150 fee."

The Woolwich added that only those who decide not to take out a mortgage with the group, despite having been accepted, and those who have an application rejected because they have given false information will have to pay the fee.

People who are rejected for a mortgage by the Woolwich due to affordability concerns will not be liable for the charge."

You may have to look in to the terms set down by the specific bank from their own website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Iccarus, it was the Woolwich and I didnt pull out. Any chance I could get a link to that info please? The letter states I will be charged £150 'withdrawal fee' and this will be taken from my credit/debit card within 7 days. There was no application fee and I havent given them my card security details to take any payment. The notes in the Brokers illustration says some of the above terms and conditions, but not the one about affordability. It also states that its payable when you have not disclosed any relevant material facts relating to your application.

 

I have no knowledge of what is on the credit file, so I cant see what I could disclose as material. They told me they did a credit search and found adverse data sending me contact details for Experian. Are they suggesting Ive given them false information? The bank and the Broker had a discussion before the offer in principle. I really dont know whats happened.

Edited by SF2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

sure here is the link to where i got the quotes from http://www.clickoncredit.co.uk/newsArchive/Mortgagewithdrawalfeeintroduced.html

 

Ive also found there mortgage lending criteria on http://www.mortgages-direct-uk.com/woolwich.htm

which gives outlines on what they will accept.

 

I hope this helps

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Adverse credit info could be anything from applying to too many financial institutions in the last 6 months or late credit card payment in last 6 months

 

The best way is just wait and see what experian have to say, to see what this adverse check the details on your credit report and also verify that their is no major differences in the electorial roll and other financial outgoings to what was in the application.

 

If there is nothing obvious .Does the remortgage application decline letter specify why your declined and if it doesent can you find the reason from the bank and check if it ties up with your credit report.

 

If it is because of either of the two items you stated earlier ,it might be worth while to add a note explaining your token payments. The ccj should not show as it is over 6 years old

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Iccarus

 

Ive looked at the letter again and they mention credit scoring as the reason. Though I called yesterday and the lady I spoke to said its because there is a adverse payment plan in place but she didnt say for what. If it was adverse shouldnt it say that in the letter? She was not very easy to understand, so Im wondering if I misheard her. I know she definetly mentioned a payment plan being the reason. Doesnt explaining token payments for an old debt still count against you as much as a CCJ would? Anyway, I'll be wiser when I see the report and check it. I should get to speak to the Broker tommorow too.

 

Thanks so much for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under normal circumstanses it doesent

The ccj is over 6 years and should not show on your credit file as it may be statute barred.(worthwile checking)

From the information youve given me you are still making payments, even though nominal for an old debt which will read as active on your credit report. This may put up your adverse payment plan and go against you as long as it is there.

 

It may be worth while to approach the original company and check if that debt has been written off especially if you are paying the third party as you are paying your £1 a week it may be the reason you cant get a mortgage.

 

It may also be prudent to add a note to your credit file explaining why your paying this account in such a way. As this could go in your favour on credit referals in the future.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Iccarus

 

I do think its the £1 token payments which has gone against me. I recently noticed that I get statements from the OC showing payments made and the outstanding balance. So they havent written it off. I called the OC on Saturday, but they said if there's anything on the file it would have been placed there by the DCA and I should contact them. I will be able to confirm this on the credit report by tomorrow.

 

If thats the case I will lose my home as I am stuggling to keep up with the mortgage at that % and needed to move to a better deal to ease the pressure. The bank BR is 5.99% which is scandalous, its the same % as my fixed rate which will end in October.

 

Im not sure what my note should say as I would imagine it will still go against me whatever I say.

 

Regards

 

SF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iccarus

 

In this case and given the terms and conditions which Woolwhich have published, would you say I am considered to have given false information as I didnt give them those details. I didnt even think about it as the account is so old. I cant afford to pay them £150. I was remortgaging and specifically looked for a deal which I didnt have any upfront bills to pay as I didnt have the money.

 

Thanks again, youve been a wonderful help, but Im really panicking. Things just seem to be snowballing and all this was thought to be behind me when I was just tarting out in life, young and not understanding the level of responsibililty I was trying to take on.

 

SF2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing to do is not panic.

 

Its best to make sure what this adverse credit is on your file, and go on from there

If it is what you state Check the status on this and see when the last time it was updated by the dca.

 

I would also check with the broker to see what specific reason they are charging the £150. As you havent pulled out they did and you were happy to continue with the arrangement.

 

Also try and find out if their is a way to continue with the arrangement or postpone it as you need to find out what this adverse credit is on your credit file. (this should also postpone the £150)

 

If they refuse.

You need to state under their terms and conditions,"People who are rejected for a mortgage by the Woolwich due to affordability concerns will not be liable for the charge." as the application was declined by themselves you should not be liable.

 

If they agree.

Dependant on what you find on your credit report Explain the situation. If it is the 13 yr old debt that is at fault it should not show on your credit report as clarified by the OC and should not effect their decision making process

 

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Iccarus

 

I followed your advice and the Broker has agreed to cover the cost of the withdrawal fee if they insist it is paid. Im not sure why my credit report is so delayed, but I still havent got access to the instant online report! So much for it being instant. Im checking if its available today, but if not Im cancelling and will send my £2 in the post. I do have some time to sort this out now.

 

Thank you so much for all of your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats good news and at least your not out of pocket even though your back to square one.

Im not sure about experian as I generally use equifax for my personal online credit checks and as far as i can remember its instant but ive been with them for a number of years.

 

Im glad I could be of help

 

Paul

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result, SF2010 and Paul, Title changed.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...