Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA descriptors and points for epilepsy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know the new ESA points system for epilepsy or should I say the descriptors for epilepsy?

 

I have around 2 seizures per month and have just had a second ESA medical.

 

The ATOS medical rep learned nothing new about me except epilepsy is a neurological condition and is incapacitating following a seizure.

 

I explained that it is nigh impossible to plan a route back to employment when you're never quite sure when the next seizure will occur.

 

I suspect he thought epilepsy is a condition where you twitch a bit then wake up and then go about your normal business. It didn't realise its like being hit by a truck and affects every aspect of your being.

 

I think the DWP have changed the points system re:ESA and epilepsy so anyone any idea?

 

Thankyou and regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing. Hi stalin I have epliepsy too. The description of being hit by a truck fits the bill with me too and the time it can take to recover, my worst case scenario two weeks in bed after stopping breathing again. On another occasion found lying for a day next to blazing radiator after fit and burnt back as couldnt move.

 

Worry that they will see I have two legs two arms and say nothing we can see as they obvioulsy dont seem to record consultant reports on their stupid system.

 

They also have to understand how employers suddenly scrunch up when know you have epilepsy. They suddenly dont want to know when having regualr seizures as time recovering costs them money that able bodies person wouldnt. Frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People see a healthy body and person but the problem lies deep inside the brain which of course is hidden from view.

 

Seizures can hit without warning, 'whack' and that's it your life comes to a halt for a week or so. An employer will not tolerate a person who cannot give consistency of attendance

 

I have no choice but to claim ESA. I have worked all my life and have had epilepsy all that time but have lost many jobs due to time off for seizures

 

If they take me off ESA i will go ballistic. It is a recognised neurological ailment. Unlike most other supposed ailments like depression, anxiety etc seizures mean you are UNCONSCIOUS! You cannot do anything because you are not 'alive'!

 

Even people with missing limbs etc know they will wake up in the morning. I dont have that luxury even with medication

 

Stress triggers my fits and lack of cash!

 

anyway chill and take care cos im off for a week

Link to post
Share on other sites

the docs an cardio specialist have put me on GABOPENTIUM seems to be working only had a few attacks per month but my condition is vascular

oxygen starvation and to cure it would mean the skull coming of then a stint put into the blockage but it s a far to expensive an operation to perform plus risky because i could have a reaction brfore the operation begins ,so i just gotta take it easy and no stress,thats the killer stress yet it is hard to avoid huh...

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been told by the DWP that I have failed the ESA medical. Even though my epilepsy has worsened since Xmas they obviously have chosen to overlook that fact and simply rejected my arguments.

 

I am awaiting the actual letter and appeal form GL24.

 

How can I be fit for work when i'm having a grand mal seizure on the kitchen floor from which it takes around 5 days to fully recover only to have another one 4 weeks later and then another one and then another one!

 

mystifying but it seems they are now deliberately, as a matter of policy, and systematically failing people in contravention of overwhelming evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi loopinlouie I'm epileptic to i was diagnosed back in 2008 since I left school i have been for interviews for numerous jobs and they have all turned me down because of my seizures. I have applied for esa twice in the past year and have been told I'm not eligible as there are no signs that I'm unfit for work. What really has annoyed me is that my mate is on it for depression it really is ridiculous as he can get over that as us epileptics are stuck with our illness for life and its also a life threatening illness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What really has annoyed me is that my mate is on it for depression it really is ridiculous as he can get over that as us epileptics are stuck with our illness for life and its also a life threatening illness.

 

Wow, how ignorant. And some people don't have epilepsy for life.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I sympathize with any ESA claimant who has such a serious condition and is denied benefit.

 

I think it is seriously wrong to suggest, however, that any claimant with a mental health issue is somehow less entitled. When it gets down to it, both epilepsy and depression (for example of a mental illness) are both caused by problems with the brain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, how ignorant. And some people don't have epilepsy for life.

 

Nystagmite Whilst I agree with the sentiment of your comment and agree taht certainly the comment from andys12 seems to underestimate the organic and difficult nature of mental illness... epilepsy is a permanent condition, it is "for life".

 

Whilst the symptoms can be managed and some fortunate people control seizures completely with medication it is never cured, it can resurface at any time and medications may need adjustment over time. The medications also have some nasty side effects that can effect abilities also and in my husbands case he had to change medications completely as they reduced his white blood count and nearly killed him!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of anyone "outgrowing" epilepsy and in the literature it has always been pointed out that even if symptoms end the risk of them starting again is there..were they definitely epileptic seizures and not the other type?

 

I was always told that epilepsy is managed and not cured and although some can go without fits for years it is never safe to assume it has gone forever.

 

I am glad that your fits are no longer troubling you Nystagmite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, my mate Lee had epilepsy until he reached his teens. Then it seemed to vanish. Last week he caught a really bad chesty cold, a virus, and at 37 had a massive fit. He's devastated by it, not least because he smashed his front teeth out on the coffee table as he went down. I know very little about this disability, but he told me that as very young children both he and his sister had chicken pox and he was really ill with it, ended up in hospital whereas his sister was skipping around in a week or so. Anyway, his mum said that the fits started just after the chicken pox virus had gone.

 

And I agree, depression is a vile and dangerous mental illness, not easily shrugged off, and can cause a person to take their own life, harm others etc. There are several types of it, and none of them should be taken lightly.

 

I hope the op fights this all the way. I really feel for my friend, he spent all his school years being told not to bother studying this that and the other because his epilepsy would preclude him from many careers/ordinary employment, then he thinks he's free of it, trains to be a carpenter in his late 20's, gets lots of regular work, has a small business going, catches a cold, then bang, all of that is lost in a moment. I wonder how DWP are going to treat him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to bump this old thread.

 

I'm also in the process of claiming ESA for epilepsy. Has anyone succeeded? Also, what descriptors apply to this condition?

 

I can only find:

 

9. Absence or loss of control whilst conscious leading to extensive evacuation of the

bowel and/or bladder, other than enuresis (bed-wetting), despite the wearing or use of

any aids or adaptations which are normally, or could reasonably be, worn or used.

(a) At least once a month experiences

(i) loss of control leading to extensive evacuation of the bowel and/or voiding of the bladder;

or

(ii) substantial leakage of the contents of a collecting device;

sufficient to require cleaning and a change in clothing. 15 points

(b) The majority of the time is at risk of loss of control leading to extensive evacuation of the

bowel and/or voiding of the bladder, sufficient to require cleaning and a change in clothing, if

not able to reach a toilet quickly. 6 points

© None of the above apply. 0 points

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember they have now decided that the criteria you quoted doesn't apply when having a seizure. So, if you have a bladder / bowel problem which happens when concious, you'd get points. But you won't get points if it only happens during a seizure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen this also, that voiding bladder/bowels during a seizure no longer counts (the law changed Jan '13).

 

Just seen another descriptor that applies:

 

10. Consciousness during waking moments.

(a) At least once a week, has an involuntary episode of lost or altered consciousness

resulting in significantly disrupted awareness or concentration. 15 points

(b) At least once a month, has an involuntary episode of lost or altered consciousness

resulting in significantly disrupted awareness or concentration. 6 points

© None of the above apply. 0 points

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This link for the Epilepsy Society may be of help: http://www.epilepsysociety.org.uk/about-esa#.UytOQ6NFDZ5

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...