Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

oh my goodness... what a mess... totalled car.. void insurance? void gap insurance?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

i really dont know where to start with this, but ill start with the facts. im looking for advice and to know my rights in the following situation.

Thanks in Advance xx

 

i purchased an 07 plate car in april 08, i financed this and i am the registered keeper, however when it came to insure the car my dad was and still is the main driver and i was the named driver, i had a crash on july 11th- just over 48 hours ago and the car has been totalled... first of all on the insurance policy document it stated the policy holder (my dad) was the registered keeper.. which we boobed on! as i am.. do we invalidate the insurance policy because of this? the insurance company asked me when i phoned the claim in who the registered keeper was i stated myself he said he would have to speak to the underwriters to see if this was ok, he came back stateing he would need to see proof of purchase on the car and the v5 (logbook) before the claim can go ahead, why do they need to see this as i have already advised them that i am and the policy holder isnt as stated on the policy? he asked how the incident happened i explained, he advised i would need to take responsibility straight away. so the car got towed and was pronounced economically unfit to repair (write off). also the insurance evaluator has already called with 48 hours to give us a price for the totalled car on the terms that the documents that were asked are provided they will pay x amount of money? surely the hiccup with the registered keeper and them offering money isnt a problem ?

 

now the car is on finance and at the time i took the finance out i took gap insurance in my name.. now do i invalidate this gap policy too because i am not the main driver on the car insurance policy as i am on the gap insurance policy?

 

1 more thing i have made a claim to gap insurance and they have said i need to provide documents, what documents would they ask for? will they ask for an mot certificate because just a little more info the new car was due its 1st mot in june 2010- it was new at purchase 2007....so no mot certificate...

 

am i gonna get done over?

 

this is not how i run my life style its just a mix up of oooh im sorting the insurance out dads sorting the mot.. and the v5 and he thought the same...

 

any advise will be sooo much appreciated... and i thank my lucky stars for seatbelts and airbags otherwise me and my little boy might not be sat here right now.

 

many thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Now, take a deep breath and relax. I'm not experienced in motor matters, but we have some good people who are and they should be along later.

 

You've given us a lot of detail to go on and I'm sure when the right cagger turns up, they'll have advice for you. It's not going to ruin your life, keep cool and count your blessings for now.

 

I'll contact a couple of insurance gurus and see if they can look in.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt look good for both policies I am afraid. The contradictions of keeper etc will void them and as the gap policy pays depending on what the first policy gives you, the gap wont pay out when looking into why problems of insurance payment of claim have arrisen

 

To put it bluntly they will suspect you of naming your dad as keeper on the first policy to save costs, there is a term for this situation, but I forget at present. Think its called fronting.

 

Its not a matter of being 'dun over' but incorect info giving doubts and invalidating.

 

Sorry not a positive comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely they wouldnt suspect us of fronting im 30 years of age, dont people 'front' for thier 18 year old kids?... he genuinely was the main driver.. he had a bad credit history i financed the car and i was the second driver.. things just genuinely got mixed up.

 

if the insurance company pay up as they have made an offer today? surely the gap insurance wont see it as problem if the 1st insurance pays up?

 

oh god this is a mess!!!

 

thankyou for your input, i fully appreciate it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your dad is the policyholder, so he would have been the one to complete the proposal form to get the quote.

 

One of the questions he would have been asked is 'Are you the registered keeper AND owner of this vehicle', he obviously answered yes to this, otherwise more questions would have been asked at that stage.

 

The registered keeper is not necessarily the owner, hence why insurers ask the question phrased in that way.

 

The policy was issued on the understanding that all questions had been answered correctly, insurance is based on 'utmost good faith'.

 

Insurers face a common problem of 'fronting', that is where an older person, usually mum or dad insures the car and lets son ro daughter drive it, but the car is really owned by the son or daughter. Obviously this reduced the insurance premiums, so the insurers now have the right to void the policy because what you stated on the propsal form was NOT true, the registered keeper and owner was not correct.

 

If your dad does not have another car (or access to one such as a company car), then there is a very small chance that you could convince the insurers it was an oversight and your dad really is the main user.

 

GAP insurance pays out the difference between what your insurers pay out and what the finance company are owed, you would have to check with them (or their terms and conditions) to see how you stand if your insurers void the policy.

 

Best advice I can give you is to plead your case with your insurers, convince them it was a genuine oversight and explain why/how this error occurred and ask them to consider dealing with it, offer to pay them any difference in premiums.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with mossycat.

 

If you purchased the car on finance, the finance company may well have required the V5 log book to state yourself as the registered owner and that you maintained adequate Insurance on the car in your name.

 

You really should have had the Insurance arranged in your name, with you stating that your dad was the main driver and registered keeper.

 

Why did you think it was ok to put the Insurance in your dads name when he doesn't own the car? The Insurers will be looking for a good explanation about this. Does your dad live at a different address and can you prove the car was kept at your dads address, providing this is the same address shown on the Insurance schedule ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

he lives at a different address? same address as the insurance policy.. how can i proove that it is kept at his address???

 

the towers from the accident towed it thier?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unclebulgaria may well have given you a lifeline. (Good thinking to check if a different address was involved)

 

Stress to your insurers that the car is his, offer to sign a statement of truth that the car is kept at your fathers property and the only reason that you are the registered keeper was to arrange the finance because your father could not get credit. State that you were not trying to deceive or front (play on your age and hopefully the fact that you have at least the same if not more NCD than your dad).

 

If things do not go well hint (that's hint at this stage) that you might involve the ombudsman.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh, i see, but then there is the other concern that im the registered owner.. i own the log book at my address.. which is a different address.. but on the policy it states that my dad is the registered owner. i have stated this to them on the telephone and they spoke to the underwriters.. and the underwriters have said they want to see proof of purchase of the car and the registration certificate, does anybody know why they are asking this>? or do they just want the proof so they can turn round and say we've got the proof we're voiding your insurance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just do everything they ask, answer any questions and explain the whole situation to them.

 

If you try to avoid or appear to delay, they will think you have something to hide.

 

If your explanation is per your posts to this site, you really should not have anything to worry about. You registered the car as you had bought it on finance. You thought (wrongly) that because your dad was the main driver/keeper of the vehicle that the policy had to be in his name.

 

Keep it simple.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...