Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Access To Gable End


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a problem with my neighbour, I am having some cavity wall insulation done shortly and have asked to gain access to his property to put some scaffolding, he will have 4 poles in his garden, the company wont do work without scaffolding.

 

I got a defient no from the neighbour, Do I have any rights on this, as i need access to my house to do maintenance.

 

can someone advise

 

thanks

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might be a bit stuck here. I can only think of two possibilities - both long shots.

 

1. Party Wall Act 1996 - depending where the boundary of the property is and whether your end wall butts up to it, you may be allowed access for 'maintenance' (s2) , but cavity wall insulation is pushing it a bit.

 

2. An easement allowing you access for maintenance - a total guess and probably extremely unlikely.

 

How about offering the neighbour a bottle (or case) of their favourite tipple for the inconvenience - much easier (and more likely to get a result) than going to law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth asking the neighbour why he has declined permission.

 

It may be he is concerned that the poles will damage his garden; and it may be that the scaffolding company has a way of avoiding that or limiting it to a level your neighbour will tolerate.

 

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 issues:

 

1) If the wall you are working on is a party wall then you need to serve a notice on your neighbour under the Party Wall etc. Act - lots of links explaining this if you google the act

 

2) If it is not a party wall check out the Access to Neighbouring Land Act - again googling this will get you lots of results.

 

3) offer your neighbour the case of wine as suggested above

Link to post
Share on other sites

the scaffolding will be down on concrete, between his water butts, and he wouldnt take a case of wine I am sure of that.

 

It all started 1 year ago, when I was laying parking bay concrete down, he had a bit of dust from the working go on his car and he flew of the handle and started swearing at me, because he had to clean his car again, since then not spoke to him, and he is just being akward, the scaffolding will be up for 2 1/2 days at the max.

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah. So he's teaching you a lesson.

 

I expect your taking legal action will only make things worse.

 

Have you tried other insulating companies and told them the problem to see if they can come up with a solution?

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was under the impression they had to drill ap;prox 2" hole to get the insulation in, dont relish 2" holes on inside of house

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is 2" then I agree with you. That would take a lot of making good.

Ours was done with a 22mm drill. I would have found this tolerable, especially if I could have persuaded the contractor to drill at discreet points to minimise/conceal cosmetic repair.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the non court route of trying to tempt your neighbor with a few bottles of his favourite wine etc.

 

If you have to get a County Court order to get access then you'll also be required to "compansate" your neighbor for the inconvience.

 

So a few cases, might just be the cheaper option ;) .

 

Regards,

Tom3131.

Before you take any legal action, please read through the

FAQ's, then if you dont understand something, please ask for advice ;) .

 

If theres a thread in which you think I could help, please PM me using the Private Messaging facility in the top right hand corner of the screen.

 

Advice & opinions of tom3131, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...