Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax arrears ....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a letter today from the council saying it has a liability order against us for council tax owed.

I called the council and spoke to one of the people in recovery. He said I have to pay £647 in the next 14 days or they will take further action.

I did say I could make a payment of £150 in the next 2 days but I couldn't afford the £647 in 14 days but he said that £ 150 was nit enough and only the £647 would be accepted to stop further action. I told him I didn't have that amount he said try and get it.

I don't know what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've moved your thread to a more appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a letter today from the council saying it has a liability order against us for council tax owed.

I called the council and spoke to one of the people in recovery. He said I have to pay £647 in the next 14 days or they will take further action.

I did say I could make a payment of £150 in the next 2 days but I couldn't afford the £647 in 14 days but he said that £ 150 was nit enough and only the £647 would be accepted to stop further action. I told him I didn't have that amount he said try and get it.

I don't know what to do.

 

 

 

 

 

Was you aware of the liability order ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I moved your thread here as it was a council tax debt and this Forum deals with council tax ect.

 

Do you want it moved back to General Debt ???

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a liability order has been obtained, the council can then come to an arrangement to pay by instalments.

Ask them for a copy of the liability order by return of post.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy I spoke to said I have lost the right to pay by installments and the £647 has to be paid within 14 days. I want to know can they really force me to pay an amount I just don't have, unless I don't pay my rent... Which I don't want to do that and end up in a mess there too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to put it in writing that you are only able to pay installments, take the letter in by hand and also cc it to your councilor and MP if needed.

 

They cannot make you pay it all in one go if you are not in a position to do so....that would be seen to be unreasonable of them. :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy I spoke to said I have lost the right to pay by installments and the £647 has to be paid within 14 days. I want to know can they really force me to pay an amount I just don't have, unless I don't pay my rent... Which I don't want to do that and end up in a mess there too.

 

 

 

 

 

Did you ever receive the summons ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy I spoke to said I have lost the right to pay by installments and the £647 has to be paid within 14 days. I want to know can they really force me to pay an amount I just don't have, unless I don't pay my rent... Which I don't want to do that and end up in a mess there too.

 

 

The important thing here is not the right or not to pay by installments, but have they got a liability order.

 

Have you received any correspondence about being in arrears?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't understand what you are saying there allwood?

 

Sorry about that Conniff....

 

if he has got to go to court then it is always good to let the court know that he has made contact with the council and informed that he can only pay by installments.

 

This happened to me going back many year ago in the early 9o's I wrote to the council and I copied everything to the court as well, also I contacted my councilor and he was a great help as well, he told me that I should write to the council and tell them to stop it, as it as if they continued it would be construed as harassment. The council then checked and found that my council tax has een paid. Remember that was before new labour came into power.:eek:

Edited by Allwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry about that Conniff....

 

if he has got to go to court then it is always good to let the court know that he has made contact with the council and informed that he can only pay by installments.

 

 

It don't work like that. If the council are seeking a liability order, the judge 'cannot' take into account the ability to pay. It is a yes or no decision, either you owe tax in which the order will be granted or you don't and show that you don't and the order won't be granted.

 

There isn't a ccj sitting in the court for council tax as the granting of a liability order gives the council powers to send in bailiffs, make an attachment of earnings, get a charging order or if the arrears are shown to be because of willfull non payment, seek a prison sentence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The non receipt of a summons is not really of any consequence in your case. There would have been no point at all in attending court to try and defend something that was indefensible.

 

You really should visit the council house and talk to someone, they will come to an arrangement, but you must remember, that any amount agreed will have to be paid alongside the present tax payments.

 

Failing to come to an agreement will mean other action is taken and that can be a deduction from any benefits you are receiving.

If they take the bailiff route, you must be given 7 days notice of one calling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seemed to me that the guy I spoke to in recovery wasn't up for making any arrangement other than pay the £647 we won't take further action. He gave me 14 days in which to do so which end on the 14th. He said by paying this amount in full I will show good will and will be able to carry on paying my council tax by installments. I havnt got all that at once plain & simple. Maybe I should just phone & pay as much as I have over the next 14 days and hope for the best. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is why I say 'go in and see them'. If you have a face to face, and show what your income is, then they will make an arrangement with you.

 

Just remember your rent is the number one priority, don't miss any payments on that.

 

Have you got any other debts ie credit cards etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The non receipt of a summons is not really of any consequence in your case. There would have been no point at all in attending court to try and defend something that was indefensible.

 

You really should visit the council house and talk to someone, they will come to an arrangement, but you must remember, that any amount agreed will have to be paid alongside the present tax payments.

 

Failing to come to an agreement will mean other action is taken and that can be a deduction from any benefits you are receiving.

If they take the bailiff route, you must be given 7 days notice of one calling.

 

 

 

 

 

If the summons can't be defended then why would one be issued ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They issue the summons so that you know they are applying for a liability order and if they have made a cock-up and you don't in fact owe any council tax, then you can tell the court and the order won't be granted.

 

The main reason is the 'extra' money they make from seeking liability orders. The court fees, depending on where you live, can be up to £150 and that is a lot of extra money seeing as it only cost £3.

 

It's all a big rip-off. The council can come to an arrangement if they want, there is no law or regulation says they can't, but they see the £ signs in front of there eyes. I think it is one of Gordon Browns stealth taxes as tens of thousands are issued each year, the majority of them unnecessarily, and it makes the councils £hundreds of millions in extra money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They issue the summons so that you know they are applying for a liability order and if they have made a cock-up and you don't in fact owe any council tax, then you can tell the court and the order won't be granted.

 

The main reason is the 'extra' money they make from seeking liability orders. The court fees, depending on where you live, can be up to £150 and that is a lot of extra money seeing as it only cost £3.

 

It's all a big rip-off. The council can come to an arrangement if they want, there is no law or regulation says they can't, but they see the £ signs in front of there eyes. I think it is one of Gordon Browns stealth taxes as tens of thousands are issued each year, the majority of them unnecessarily, and it makes the councils £hundreds of millions in extra money.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's all a big rip-off as you say..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...