Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post Office scandal expert Moorhead predicts solicitor strike-offs Richard Moorhead, professor of law and professional ethics at the University of Exeter and a prolific writer on the Horizon scandal, said it was ‘highly likely’ that people would be removed from the profession. He added that he also expects one or two individuals to face criminal prosecutions. He was ‘cautiously supportive’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority's position of waiting until the public inquiry has finished before taking any decisions on disciplinary proceedings, saying the regulator has been doing a lot of investigatory work behind the scenes. But Moorhead said the SRA should provide ‘greater clarity and detail’ about what it is doing currently.   Professor Richard Moorhead predicts strike-offs over Post Office Horizon scandal | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Lawyers have been 'everywhere' in the scandal, Professor Richard Moorhead tells legal ethics conference.
    • If this goes to court, you'll be asked to declare your earnings. Any fine is a percentage of what you earn per week.  
    • Hi Dx, HB can you share the link of Tireddodo's case thread , may be i can learn something from there?  
    • As i don't have any mitigating circumstances other than trying to save pennies, will they fine me to the maximum? What is the maximum fine they will impose? I honestly don't know how many times i use it.  I will get a criminal record which means i can't find another job? Will they prosecute my partner?   
    • Yes. They won't inform your employer but you may need to. You need to check what it says iin your employment contract. I don't think it usually causes huge problems for most people. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Classic car value - insureance write off value


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got a 1987 classic mini. Paid £3500 for it a month or so ago so its worth a bit more than a standard mini of this age. (20K miles, japanese special edition etc).

 

When I swapped my insurance over I did make sure I told them how much it was worth.

 

Anyway, some young girl ran into the back of it when it was outside the shops and caused some damage. Not a huge amount but some.

Obviously, not my fault, but now my insurance company are saying it might be written. Sounds like they're maybe basing this on something like £500-£1000 value of the car rather than the proper value.

 

Is there anything I can do about this? Surely, the third party or they're insurer are obliged to put things right.

 

Someone said I should have a guaranteed value classic car policy but I did mention the value to insurer when I changed the insurer over. Also, surely my policy doesnt matter if the accident was not my fault at all. I could be insured third party only...

 

Anything I can do about this? Otherwise I could be a few K out of pocket here...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arggg! I remember someone telling me about classic car insurance also, so I fear this 'someone' may be right. As far as I know (perhaps Mossycat; our insurance expert will clarify), if it is a normal policy then the insueres will go on the value as stated in Glass's guide. One thing i'm not clear; are you or are you not TP only?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Fully Comp. But surely that doesnt matter here because its the other insurer who'll be paying up. Like I said, car was parked.

 

After all, I've got no obligation to advise every insurer in the country that if their client hits me its gonna cost more than normal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely a third parties insurer cant only give the standard Glass' value guide to a car their insured hits?

 

Otherwise, you'd be scared to drive a classic car in case someone hit it and you'd get £500 paid out !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely a third parties insurer cant only give the standard Glass' value guide to a car their insured hits?

 

Otherwise, you'd be scared to drive a classic car in case someone hit it and you'd get £500 paid out !!!

 

I agree, but that is why there is this classic car insurance. As you say, under the circumstances, it will be the TP insures paying out so at least you NCB should not be affected. But all insurers will mitigate their losses and attempt to pay out the minimum value. What is the value stated in your insurance schedule?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but that is why there is this classic car insurance. As you say, under the circumstances, it will be the TP insures paying out so at least you NCB should not be affected. But all insurers will mitigate their losses and attempt to pay out the minimum value. What is the value stated in your insurance schedule?

 

Yes, agreed they're going to pay out as little as possible.

 

However, if for example, they insure a 17yr old boy racer in his souped up nova and he shunts into the back of a £100K Ferrari then its just tough luck....

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a world of difference between a standard motor policy and an agreed value motor policy.

 

When an insurer asks the value of the car on a proposal form you are NOT insuring it for that amount, they ask that because if the value you state differs widely from the value they expect a car of that make/model/age to be then it flags alarm bells and they will ask for some more information before insuring it.

 

If you are fully comp then your own insurers will deal with the accident and make you a payment, and then they will recover their money from the responsible party. However, they do have a duty to mitigate their losses so they will only pay out it's true value.

 

You might be in for a rough ride with this one if the value of your car is so much higher than a standard car because if you didn't have an agreed value on a specialist car then the insurers will have based their premiums on a standard car (ie what they would expect to pay out in value if the car is a total loss), so they may well ask you to pay the difference in premiums now.

 

At the end of the day insurance is there to put you back in the position you were in prior to the loss, if your own insurers give you the run around or argue about the vlue you could always ask them to close the claim and go direct to the third party insurers yourself and seek a settlement.

 

In order to fight this properly you need documentary evidence that your car is not a standard run of the mill car, and also evidence of what similar models are currently selling for, have that to hand ready and post back when they make you an offer.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a world of difference between a standard motor policy and an agreed value motor policy.

 

When an insurer asks the value of the car on a proposal form you are NOT insuring it for that amount, they ask that because if the value you state differs widely from the value they expect a car of that make/model/age to be then it flags alarm bells and they will ask for some more information before insuring it.

 

If you are fully comp then your own insurers will deal with the accident and make you a payment, and then they will recover their money from the responsible party. However, they do have a duty to mitigate their losses so they will only pay out it's true value.

 

You might be in for a rough ride with this one if the value of your car is so much higher than a standard car because if you didn't have an agreed value on a specialist car then the insurers will have based their premiums on a standard car (ie what they would expect to pay out in value if the car is a total loss), so they may well ask you to pay the difference in premiums now.

 

At the end of the day insurance is there to put you back in the position you were in prior to the loss, if your own insurers give you the run around or argue about the vlue you could always ask them to close the claim and go direct to the third party insurers yourself and seek a settlement.

 

In order to fight this properly you need documentary evidence that your car is not a standard run of the mill car, and also evidence of what similar models are currently selling for, have that to hand ready and post back when they make you an offer.

 

Mossy

 

Mossy,

 

Thanks for the advice. I'm learning about insurance here now.

 

I did say the value of the car was £3500 (standard price is probably £1000) but no-one flagged that up. I thought that that was what that figure was for - insured value.

 

Yes. I can see how my insurer may be forced to only pay out what they are able to - i.e. standard valuation. No good for me.

 

Anyway, they're getting back to me later to today because my preference is that they just do the repairs anyway. I guess the problem is that if they;ve worked out as cost of repairs anywhere approaching £1000 then thats whats happening.

 

Of course, with the true value of the car being £3500 then I cant see how the repairs would cost anywhere approaching this. It was only a small bump.....

 

Yeh. I'll see what happens and if need be drop it with my insurer and fight it out with the 3rd party one. Are you my insurer going to be ok with this? i.e. starting a claim and then dropping it?

 

Not concerned about being able to prove that its worth the extra. That is what they're going for and I'm sure I could get an independent valuation. Also, I only bought it a month ago.

 

Lots of hassle though because some dosy bint was on her phone while driving into the car park !!!

 

Reckon I can claim for all my wasted time off the 3rd party insurer? LOL

 

When this is sorted I'm gonna see where I stand with my policy though and check to make sure car is covered for proper value. Cancel and get proper classic car insurance if necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK wait and see what your insurer comes back with and then post back and we'll advise you of the best way to get what you want (if that is possible).

 

I'd certainly be looking to get an agreed value policy if your car is that specialist and above GG values, but you can sort that out once your car is back on the road.

 

Yes you can claim for your wasted time off the TP, it's called uninsured losses and you claim for anything that this accident has cost you in terms of time (getting estimates etc), phone calls, letters, out of pocket expenses (stationery, postage), general inconvenience (stick in £25 for that one), loss of use or hire car, etc.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK wait and see what your insurer comes back with and then post back and we'll advise you of the best way to get what you want (if that is possible).

 

I'd certainly be looking to get an agreed value policy if your car is that specialist and above GG values, but you can sort that out once your car is back on the road.

 

Yes you can claim for your wasted time off the TP, it's called uninsured losses and you claim for anything that this accident has cost you in terms of time (getting estimates etc), phone calls, letters, out of pocket expenses (stationery, postage), general inconvenience (stick in £25 for that one), loss of use or hire car, etc.

 

Mossy

 

OK. Will do....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...