Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sofa damage from dog, was less than 6 weeks old when happened... insurer wants to restore !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have a contents policy with MoreThen insurance.

 

I recently purchased a new 2+3 seater recliner sofa's costing £1500 + delivery. These were delivered towards the end of March 2010.

 

In late April 2010 my partner did not close the front room door so the latch caught, but did lock the handle (privacy style handle/door lock. Usa style) and went out. The dog pushed the door open and for what ever reason has clawed the seat of one of the two seater sofas.... caught the back panel and the arm panel.

 

The seat panel has fade lines in the dye and has broken the surface of the leather (the skin).

 

The sofa's I bought are all leather with no leather match on them also.

 

 

After morethan sending out their "assessor" to take photos and messing me around for two days, he finally comes and takes photos and says "ok I will send these on to the mgt company".

 

Around two weeks later I get a call from the mgt company saying "we are just calling to check you have been contacted by the restorers to arrange an appointment"

 

To which I replied, no I have not and do not feel it can be restored to pre-damage condition. How do you restore leather that has the skin removed, which is now effectively swede ?

 

I spoke to a manager with whom I agreed that the restorers where to contact me by phone and explain how they were going to magically repair my sofa back to a natural finish.

 

Anyway, this went on and on and on with morethan saying they are entitled to repair before replace.

 

 

 

Now to my concerns, As above I do not feel that the "restorer" will actually repair the damage but HIDE it. Which in my opinion is not a repair, and not what I pay for.

How can they replace the skin of the leather panel by restoring it, this is a natural product... which I assume they will use some form of synthetic agent on it to hide the scratches.

 

 

Where do I stand on this ?

 

This last phone call happened 12 days ago, and today I get a call saying "our restorer says they can repair your sofa"

 

Thats funny, they have not even looked at it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best advice is to go with the flow. Let the Insurers have the sofa inspected with a view to restoration. They have specialist companies that deal with this everyday, so if they cannot put back into the original condition, they will advise the Insurers. Then replacement will be the option.

 

If you kick up a fuss at this stage, it could just delay matters.

 

There are independent companies that will provide you with an other opinion, if you find it necessary at any stage. This will be at your cost.

 

My feeling on this is that they will repair the sofa's to their original condition and not need to replace.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best advice is to go with the flow. Let the Insurers have the sofa inspected with a view to restoration. They have specialist companies that deal with this everyday, so if they cannot put back into the original condition, they will advise the Insurers. Then replacement will be the option.

 

If you kick up a fuss at this stage, it could just delay matters.

 

There are independent companies that will provide you with an other opinion, if you find it necessary at any stage. This will be at your cost.

 

My feeling on this is that they will repair the sofa's to their original condition and not need to replace.

 

 

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

My concern is that the insurers will advise the restorer to repair to save costs...

The problem being, its a near brand new sofa.... and the only way to repair completely is to replace the panels... which I have been told they wouldnt do in any case, they would replace the whole sofa.

 

The fact remains of my concern, that once the skin on leather is breached you have swede ! no amount of restoration is going to replace that skin, with skin ? is it ? Never seen "real" leather skin in a bottle before :p

 

lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would have thought that they would take the sofa away to their workshop and repair it to the same condition as it was when new. Then return to your address for inspection to make sure you are happy.

 

If you are not happy, you can reject by making a complaint to the claims department. If the sofa is not in a 'as new' condition, the Insurers would have to restore it properly or pay to replace.

 

When you take apart a sofa, they are generally pretty basically constructed and parts can be replaced. The repair company will have a vast range of replacement leather material in most colours. If the panels have been damaged they will replace the wood and filling as necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would have thought that they would take the sofa away to their workshop and repair it to the same condition as it was when new. Then return to your address for inspection to make sure you are happy.

 

If you are not happy, you can reject by making a complaint to the claims department. If the sofa is not in a 'as new' condition, the Insurers would have to restore it properly or pay to replace.

 

When you take apart a sofa, they are generally pretty basically constructed and parts can be replaced. The repair company will have a vast range of replacement leather material in most colours. If the panels have been damaged they will replace the wood and filling as necessary.

 

 

No mate, they specifically said a "in home repair"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...