Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance refuse to pay up for written off car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok here is the situation as far as I can tell

 

a year ago I took out personal finance to buy a car for my mum so that she could drive around looking for jobs etc as she recently moved back to the UK.

When she took at an insurance policy with the Post office (who are the brokers for Co-op insurance) she stated that the registered keeper was her son (me) and asked if that would be a problem, they told her no and insured her as the first driver then me as the second.

 

She had an accident 2 months ago and the car, even though she could drive it was taken by the insurance company who took the car away to be assessed and gave her a courtesy car. They asked her for the log book etc and she posted it off to them. A short while after that they called and said the car was written off and they were going to send me a settlement check.

 

After a short while after that the wrote and called saying that they were misinformed about the policy, co-op said that after speaking with their brokers (the post office), who we got the insurance out with to begin with, that they had they been aware that she was not the registered keeper of the car that they would have never insured her. So they are making it quite difficult and have given us 28 days to reply to them as to why she is insuring a car for which does not belong to her.....

 

we have written a letter to them below:

 

Dear xxxxx,

In regards to your last letter inquiring as to why I have insured the car in my name and not my son’s is simply that my son, XXXXX has his own insurance for his own car (ford fiesta).

I would like to take this opportunity to state that I am the sole driver of the car in question (Peugeot Reg: XXXXX) , my son has never driven this car once. The car is essentially mine, my son paid for the car via finance and I pay him back in monthly installments, he asked to keep the ownership in his name until I pay him back. So in effect he has bought me the car, I pay him for it monthly and he keeps the car in his name until I have paid the majority of the car off and then it would be transferred into my name.

The broker (Post office) were informed of all this when I took out the policy over the phone last year and were quite happy for me to take out a car insurance policy with them in my namein. It has been over a month now, where I have had to rent cars and get around with difficulty thanks to this issue not being resolved.

If this matter can be sorted out the next seven days I will have to seek professional advice

Yours faithfully

Ms X

 

 

This letter was sent a week and a half ago and I fear they might not have gotten it as we havent heard from them, so I was going to get it sent via recorded mail. But i thought I'd see what my options were and whether or not I was penalised...

 

My question to anyone is what can I do=, what is the worst case scenario? They give my mum back the car in the state it was left in "written off" while my mum continues to pay the monthly installments until its paid off in full

 

Please could someone give me some stern advice. I would be most grateful to you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the Insurers are making enquiries with the Post Office. I believe the Post Offices Car Insurance is handled by BISL, who have placed the risk with the Coop in this instance. The Coop will ask BISL for a copy of the phone call to see if the ownership of the car was declared, as has been stated. If the Coop find that the owership was declared a being yours, but your mum had some financial interest, as she was paying you back, they may accept the claim and pay the market value for the car. If they find that the ownership was not advised correctly or they cannot find a copy of the phone call, the Coop may decline the claim and void the Insurance.

 

I would suggest that your mum sends a copy of the letter, chasing this up by recorded delivery. This may not be quickly resolved. Be careful about the hire car that has been provided. If the claim is declined, your mum will have to pay for this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice so far, I will send that letter off first thing tomorrow to make sure I get it to them before the 28 days is up, (they gave me a time frame before going to the underwriters).

 

A mate of mine suggested I go to a lawyer as he reckons we won't get a thing otherwise. Problem is I don't have the money at the moment, and time is ticking, mum went to the CAB and they referred her to some insurance lawyers down in slough for 60 an hour.

 

Guess I'll have to cross my fingers and see

 

one again thanks for replying

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...