Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the xx/xx/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the xx/xx/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, xx/xx/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Neighbours ignoring their responsibility


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, hoping someone can give me some advice...

 

Neighbour's Garden Fence

Our rear garden has a boundary fence to our neighbours garden (they own the boundary fence). Since we moved in last year, the fence between is in an extremely poor state and needs complete replacement.

Their garden is overgrown and the fence falling down and during the winter the fence has been damaged further. In heavy winds, the fence shifts and falls into our garden by about 2-3 feet. Even with slight wind, it bows into our garden and is disjointed and creaks heavily.

We cannot use our side gate at all because the posts are broken. The side gate has to be barricaded with bricks to hold it and we have no access to our garden this way.

We have to hold the fence up with paving slabs and bricks to stop in falling inwards on our garden.

We have 2 small pets who cannot be let out into the garden unless we block all the gaps up along this fence and stack bricks against the side gate every time we let them out because the fence is bent, gapping and the side gate does not meet the fence post .

This is dangerous in case it falls, and I do not think it fair that we suffer and our pets are at risk of escaping therefore cannot be let out.

It really does need replacing and we have written two very polite letters to them to request so. It also looks really unsightly from our side.

I apporached our council and they say its a 'civil matter' therefore cannot get involved.

The trees alongside the fence by the side of their house also push the fence and are overgrown but we cannot get to them to trim them down to stop them overgrowing into our garden. Their garden is very unkempt.

Leaking Water Tank Overflow Pipe

Finally, for a few weeks now we have noticed that their water tank overflow pipe at the back of their house is leaking quite substantially from the roof. Although this is not a problem during the day as much as it seems to slow down (I presume because they are using water more frequently), at night we can hear it from our bedroom and there is quite a significant amount of water flowing out constantly. It is very loud and we cannot even have the window open as it is only a few meters away from our house. We assumed this would be repaired but its nearly been a month that we have had to listen to gushing water from an overflow pipe right outside our bedroom window.

We have mentioned this in the letters about the fence but its still leaking...

Help please, greatly appreciated! :( Don't know what to do anymore, they don't act upon our letters and they don't answer the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

just because it is his boundary he does not have to but a fence up.we had a simalar proplem as we had a new bloke move in with a dog and he wanted us to but a fence up so his dog didnt get out.we pointed out to him that it was up to him to keep his dog under control and of our land.after a couple of times his dog came over and messed on our garden we took photos and told him that we would report him for failing to control his dog.he then asked if we would allow him to but a fence up to which we said yes.we still had to listen to his dog barking for 2 years till we moved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Car nut - I'm not sure I agree with your point but I understand the principle. If the fence is already there, and was when he bought the property, and it has since fell into complete disrepair, then that is his responsibility to sort out. Especially when it is intruding onto our garden and has broken our side gate around the side of the house.

 

Does anyone else have advice; this still remains unresolved? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't you put up a fence on your side?

 

We have the same problem where the old neighbours were in a terrible state of health so couldn't do it (we didn't mind that too much), now they're gone, new neighbours and they haven't done a single thing to fix things, and the broken fences are leaning into my bamboos :mad:. What we have done is put fences and trellis which push theirs away from our side, and if the rotted one falls apart as a consequence, well that really doesn't concern me.

 

That's really the best advice I can give under the circumstances that won't leave you potentially very out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your advice. I don't really want to go to the expense of putting up a new fence on our side; it's not our fault their fence is broken and they should take responsibility for it because it's part of their land. Plus, our garden is patio all the way along the fence and therefore would be difficult to put new fence posts in.

I think I may just have to persist with trying to talk to them and maybe give in and offer 50/50 to replace it maybe. Although we will require an entire new gate which I bet they won' t agree to replace :mad:.

 

Thanks for all advice here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the fence might be a eye sore and falling down but i dont think you have to have a fence on your boundary.also if i but a 3 foot fence up and your dog jumped over it its up to you to make it secure.he might just take the hole thing down if you moan to much!then when your dog goes in his garden he be moaning at you and if your dog bit him /kids you could have big proplems.

the best thing to do is to talk to him but he might not have any cash for a new fence

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

The water problem, he has to get fixed , as it falls under waste of water legislation. A water company can get a warrant to get it done if he fails to heed their notification under : Water Industry Act section 75

 

Water Industry Act 1991 (c. 56)

 

Just contact your council and they will tell you which water company is responsible for your area. Contact that water company and they will send someone to investigate. Then the perpetrator gets his initial notification to fix it within 21 days . If he doesn't , they start legal proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is some information as to what they can expect , if they don't do it within 21 days. From 3 valley water company :

 

What will happen if I don’t repair the leak?

It is our responsibility to prevent any loss of water and notify the responsible parties any leakage we detect. Ideally the responsible person or company will arrange to carry out the repair, arranging the contractor of their choice and agreeing a price. However, if the leak is not repaired, we may serve a legal notice under section 75 of the Water Industry Act 1991.

This formal notice advises owners to repair the leak within 8 days of writing. If we have not been advised of a repair in this time, we will then arrange a repair ourselves. If necessary, we are able to gain a warrant in order to gain access to the property. The repair will be carried out by contractors of our choosing and all costs incurred by us will be charged to the property owner. Please help to avoid any unnecessary expense and legal action by arranging your repair promptly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...