Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi i am new to this site and desperately need advice! last year i took out fully comp car insurance with co-op. in oct 2009 whist my car was parked and locked, a french lorry driver(driving a british company lorry) swung round the corner and smashed my wing mirror off and then tried to drive off! an independent witness saw this and i had to run after the driver to get him to stop. i then got all details i could including reg number and contacted co-op who said they would claim against him and that it would NOT affect my no claims or excess as the other driver was at fault and it would all be claimed off him as i was not at fault. this was 7 mths ago and now i have received my proof of no claims with 3yrs deducted and i have been billed for the excess by the company who repaired my car(the company co-op insisted i had to take my car to) i thought it must be a mistake and phoned co-op who said it was a mistake by their underwriters and they would give me my no-claims back and would pay the excess. 2 days later co-op phoned and said they would now not give me back my no-claims or sort out the excess! after many words i asked to speak to the supervisor who was extremely rude! when i pointed out that i was even in the car when it was hit, so therefore i was not at fault, he said that they hadnt proved the other driver liable so had therefore held me liable! i told him there was no way i could be liable as i wasnt in the car but he almost laughed and said 'well, we havnt got proof you werent responsible, you might of left the handbrake off!' when i told him that he knew that wasnt the case and that it wasnt a good enough explaination, especially as i have an independent witness, he was dismissive. when i then said i would complain to insurance ombudsman, he laughed and said 'carry on, it will take at least 8wks before we even have to reply!

i cant believe co-op are treating me like this when i have done absolutely nothing wrong and did as co-op advised me! can anyone help? this will affect me badly as with 3 yrs no-claims now removed through no fault of my own, i will no longer be able to afford to keep my car on the road and as the only driver in the family household this is going to have a very detrimental effect on my family, my children rely on me driving! i am literally starting to crack-up over this, i have shed many tears :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make a formal complaint to coop using their complaints process. This information is from the CIS complaints info online. Give them a phone call with all the details, advising that you would like to make an official complaint. My advice would be to phone them, but before you do so, write down all the points to your complaint, including the rudeness shown by a CIS claims supervisor. This is the quickest way. CIS do have up to 8 weeks to resolve before you can go to the FOS. The FOS could take 6 months to resolve, so you need to get CIS to take responsibility to resolve. Unfortunately, if CIS cannot get the third parties Insurers to pay up, this will go against you as a fault claim. But surely this shows the CIS have been very poor at their negotiations with the third parties Insurers.

 

Here at CIS, we take complaints very seriously. If something goes wrong, we like to know so we can make sure it never happens again.

That's why we promise to:

 

  • deal fairly and promptly with all complaints
  • try to resolve complaints straight away, where possible
  • respond to you in writing once our investigations are complete
  • keep you informed of our progress in writing

If you feel you need to make a complaint, it's usually best to contact the person you've been dealing with. They should be able to help sort through any problems that have occurred.

You can also contact the manager of the person, or speak to your Financial Adviser. Alternatively, you can get in touch with our Central Customer Relations Unit in a number of ways:

 

  • call on 0845 300 03 74
  • or write to:

Central Customer Relations Unit

CIS

Miller Street

Manchester

M60 0AL

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A no claims discount is a discount for not making a claim, it is not a discount for having an accident that was not your fault.

 

The fact that you were not in your car does mean that you were not liable for the accident, but it does noty change the fact that you have made a claim and your discount has therefore been lost/affected until such time as the CIS recover their outlay from the responsible party. If they cannot recover their outlay, then you will lose your discount (unless you choose to refund any money they have paid out in respect of this claim).

 

An excess is NOT something the CIS would normally recover for you, this is something that you need to recover personally from the party responsible for the damage.

 

I would suggest that you mis-understood what the CIS told you over the phone, and it was more likely that you were advised that if they recovered their outlay then you NCD would not be affected and your excess should be recoverable (by you that is and not by the CIS).

 

I don't see that a complaint to the FOS would get you any further forward in this matter.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks all for your reply. though i will say that i did not mis-understand any reply and i only put the claim in against the other party because co-op told me to and assured me it would NOT affect my policy as i was not at fault. on the 10th may when i spoke to co-op they assured me once again that i did not have to pay the excess and that they would forward payment immediately to the company who fixed the car and they would definately re-imburse my no claims....that was not a misunderstanding....that IS what they said! they then phoned 2 days later and said completely the opposite. the way i was treated on the phone by this company was totally unprofessional. i have spoken to the police and a minster of law about this, both say that actually co-op are wrong and should be doing more to sort this out. it might of been sorted out had co-op actually taken the correct number plate in the first place and actually bothered to contact the british lorry firm who hired a foreign driver. but many thanks for your reply anyway :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...