Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claiming on contents insurance as a result of a burglary


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Was burgled yesterday and had quite a lot of things stole and need to claim on my contents insurance. I have a few reservations I hope you can help me with:

 

1) Will they ask for proof of purchase/ownership? I have the boxes of things that were stolen, but definitely not all the receipts as some things were gifts or are past their warranty.

 

2) Are they likely to value my goods at less that what they would cost to replace? For instance I had a brand new wii + 2 full controllers costing £250. Can I expect only getting back a fraction of this?

 

Also, I had an item stolen that wasn't mine, but was in my house at the time. Is this claimable?

 

The last thing is that its a rented accommodation, and is a house share between myself and two of my friends - again, would there be any issues arising from this?

 

Sorry for all the questions - first time burgled and still slightly ****ed off about it all!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all sorry to hear about this-its not a very nice experience.

 

It is usual that you will need to show some evidence of the items you want to claim for,whether it be receipts,photographs etc.

 

Much of the info you are asking for-should be detailed in your policy docs.

 

The shared occupancy scenario would prob come into question if you had not declared this when taking out your policy.

 

Hopefully others will be around to add more here.

Edited by MARTIN3030
typo

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support! I'm thankful that it looks like an opportunistic burglary by some kids. It really could have been so much worse considering I car share and my car keys were on the coffee table right next to where most of the items were stolen, and that I'd gone out the back and taken the back door key/back gate key with me. Given where we live we've vehemently kept the blinds closed around the house to minimise what can be seen.

 

Still, it very much sucks! The policy is from Endsleigh who specialise in shared tenancy contents insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok.

If you have not got the policy details at hand-you should be able to view them online.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In regard to the shared tenancy occupancy of the property, as long as you have declared this to Endsleigh, then that should not be a problem.

 

Insurers will always look for as much proof of ownership as possible, so they have a chance of working out the loss value. This could be operating manuals for electricals, photo's, bank statements showing purchase etc. It is up to you to work with the Insurers assessor, to help them help you. What assessors really hate are people just moaning about what they can't do. Try your best to help. People that are difficult with assessors, tend to set alarm bells ringing that the claim or amount being claimed are not right, so this just leads to investigations/delays.

 

For policies that are described as valuables e.g. jewellery, the policy terms will state that proof of ownership will be required. Insurers are normally strict about this.

 

If the policy is new for old, then Insurers will settle for the cost of replacement, less the excess. Insurers may opt to arrange replacement of certain goods themselves, rather than settle by cash. Under a new for old policy, things like clothing and linen are subject to wear and tear deductions.

 

For the item that was not yours, it depends on what this was and the arrangement. Speak to the Insurers and their assessor.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit concerned with that fact that I have 2 PS3's, one is a slim one (which i have the box/receipt), but the other is the original (which i have the box).

 

Again, I also had 2 digital cameras, one of which being a gift (which I have boxes, no receipts).

 

I'm hoping these are not issues due to the shared tenancy :/

 

Fortunately I always keep boxes of things in storage so nothing that was taken is without the box it came in - so this should go some way to providing evidence to the insurers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2 PS3's and digital cameras will not be a problem, if you have some proof of ownership i.e. the boxes.

 

BUT, the Insurers must have been aware of the shared ownership. You stated in a post that Endsleigh specialise in this area, which is true, but only if you declared this and they have underwritten the policy on this basis.

 

If you have not declared the occupancy, Endsleigh could decline the claim and make your policy void. If the happened you could of course appeal this with them and go to the FOS if necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been declared as shared tenancy (as that was the basis upon which the policy was taken out), so that shouldn't be a problem.

 

I've got a crime ref. no. to supply them with as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pertinky, Ive recently had dealings with loss adjusters. Admitedly, mine was a shed burglary but well over £5000 of fishing tackle stolen.

Most of my equipment had been bought from ebay or from tackle sales so I had very little in the way of receipts.

The loss adjuster asked to see my ebay account, my wife had deleted everything a few weeks previously so there was just a few recent things showing.

He looked at the shed but never went in it.

His only concern was that he was under the inpression the policy was quite new - it wasnt, it was originally taken over from Norwich Union by Aviva. When I pointed this out, he called me less than an hour after leaving here stating he was happy with the claim and would recommend it be paid out.

Insurance on the shed was capped at £2500 but I wasnt too bothered about that because fishing tackle devalues very quickly when bought new - and I did manage to replace all my stuff with far better equipment and still have a fair amount for myself:)

The only reservation I had is that the insurance company have their own tackle supplier so I had the choice of a £2500 coupon to shop there, or a reduced payment of £2150 in cash - this figure they say is less the discount they could get from the supplier.

I took the cash and got myself a much better deal.

 

Just my experience of loss-adjusters. Hope it helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...