Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

can i claim this back??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I purchased a car 2 years ago from Bristol Street Motors and the finance was through british credit trust. When i purchased the car, Bristol Street Motors told me i "had" to take out the 3 year GAP insurance at a cost of £599, otherwise i would not be able to get the finance for the car! I saw on another thread that someone had asked if they could claim back the GAP insurance and someone told them they could.

 

Is this correct? can i claim it back?

 

thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two main types of GAP Insurance:-

 

1. GAP Insurance taken out within 3 months of delivery of a new car – this insurance covers the shortfall or "gap" between the insurance settlement and either the original price paid, a new for old replacement or any finance that is outstanding.

 

2. GAP Insurance bought more than 3 months after delivery or on a vehicle that is over 5 years old – this insurance covers the shortfall or "gap" between the insurance settlement and a Parker's Private Good valuation of the vehicle.

 

GAP insurance is generally required if you take out a lease agreement because although the car is still owned by the dealership or car manufacturer the lease holder is financially responsible for the vehicle. GAP insurance in these circumstances makes perfect sense because it protects the lease holder from financial loss in the case of an accident and we've all heard about people who have lost out when their vehicle has been written off by an insurance company.

 

However, GAP insurance is not always required, is not always suitable and can be missold. It may be missold by dealerships who want the extra money or who are ignorant and just automatically add it to the loan or lease agreement without advising the buyer of what it is or asking them if they want it.

 

As a consumer, you have the right to refuse gap insurance and to be given the appropriate advice.

 

You may not need GAP insurance if:-

 

-- You have adequate cash reserves to cover the shortfall between the insurance settlement and value of the vehicles, and so do not want to pay insurance premiums

 

-- You are already covered through your motor insurance

-- The loan agreement covers any gap in value

-- Your vehicle is heavily discounted so there would not be a gap in value

 

In these circumstances, you would want the option to refuse GAP insurance as it is not relevant to your circumstances. If the GAP insurance is not needed then it can be deemed to have been missold if it was added to your loan, hire purchase or lease agreement.

 

If you have found that GAP insurance has been added to your agreement without your knowledge, where it is not needed or where it is even invalid, then you may be eligible for claiming a refund of policy premiums paid on this missold GAP insurance policy

 

nicked from another site...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The GAP insurance was taken out when i completed the relevant forms with the dealership. They told me i had to have it, otherwise i would not get the finance. They told me that if i had to claim if my car was stolen and written off, NOT to claim through my own insurance, but to claim from the GAP insurance because it would cover me more financially than my own insurance would. EG.... IF vechicle was written off, my own insurance would only pay "bottom book" GAP insurance would cover say if i paid £10k for the car, i would get £10k back. Don't know if this is true or not but thats what they told me. I have fully comp insurance myself, and although GAP insurance sounds good, if its true what they tell me, but if its not, then im paying 2 lots of insurance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim it!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a standard letter to send to claim back GAP insurance? Also, if i claimed it back successfully, the lender would obviously have to recalculate my agreement yes? Would they recalculate it for the period of time that is left (which is 3 years) or would they recalculate it for the whole 5 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot make yousign a new agreemnet nor vary the term, it will be a restucture over the same period but at a lower PCM.

 

no std letters

 

see the stickies at the top of the forum.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...