Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS charges - Where now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 2nd January 2009 I received two bank charges for failed DD payments. I subsequently received a further two charges on 6th and 7th as a result of those of the 2nd. I complained to RBS on the basis 2nd January is a statutory Scottish Bank Holiday (my initial thread) so the DDs shouldn't have been processed, my argument being that I live in Scotland, RBS HQ is in Scotland, my branch is in Scotland, and my 6 closest branches are in Scotland and were all shut for the bank holiday. When I noticed the charges I searched the internet to find that Scottish banks harmonised with England with regards to bank holidays, therefore 2nd January is a bank holiday only by name. I also argued the point that RBS must make customers aware that it isn't a "proper" bank holiday and that in the 29 years i had been on this planet, i was not aware of the harmonisation.

 

RBS offered to refund two charges. I was not happy with their offer so letter ping pong ensued until the bank said it was their final response. So in April 2009 I went to the FOS. Person 1 at the FOS decided my case merited further investigation so it was sent to an adjudicator. Adjudicator sided with RBS so I said I wasn't happy. After a bit more letter ping pong it was passed to another adjudicator, who still sided with RBS. After more letter it was passed to another adjudicator only to be taken over by his supervisor. He has also sided with RBS.

 

After almost a year, finally someone at the FOS has told me its not their remit to regulate on the bank holiday issue, which I feel is the basis of my complaint. He feels the core of my complaint is the issue of whether paying money into my account on the day a DD is due will guarantee payment, which RBS T&Cs say they won't (money must be in the working day before), despite never having had a DD fail in these circumstances in the 7 yrs I've had an account with them. I had argued that if I'd known the DDs were being taken on the 2nd, I would've paid cash in at my nearest open branch first thing that morning. I even argued I could've arranged for a faster payment (nearly instant) or RBS-RBS (instant) transfer on the 1st January. He dismissed the faster payment argument saying it was no different than a cash payment.

 

He says I can have my case passed to an ombudsman if I wish. Is it really worth asking for an ombudsman to look into it? I can't be bothered with the waiting, and wonder if I'm better going down the new charges route and claiming roughly £300 in previous charges too.

 

What will I do? Who can I complain to about the RBS not informing customers about the Scottish bank non-holiday, the OFT? Will I forget this argument and go for the bigger money with the new bank charges claim direction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...