Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    Has anyone here begun a claim using the Reg.5 of UTCCR yet?


  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    Any thoughts on this? Is everyone hanging fire until someone else takes the plunge first and sees how it pans out? If so, I'll be happy to start a small claimicon against Halifaxicon for a few charges since I last claimed before the test case if there's plenty of advice available to hone my claim.


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    Is there a more up to date Prelim letter that accounts for the final Supreme Court ruling? The current one mentions the earlier High Court ruling.

    I'm planning two claims against Halifaxicon:
    The first is for charges levied since November 2007.
    The second is for the interesticon charged on charges between Feb 2003 to May 2007 when they refunded charges. At the time, like a lot of people here, I never claimed for the interest so I'm planning on claiming it now.

    I want to get the ball rolling straight away with these, but I don't want to start until I know the letters are accurate.


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    I've been through my records and I've noticed that the charges incurred since Nov 2007 have been from them paying a debit card transaction when insufficient cash was in the account. Does this count as unfair because they have decided to honour the transaction and make £30 a time rather than reject the transaction and make nothing. I suspect this would fall under Reg.5


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    I think I've got it.

    Within "INDICATIVE AND NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF TERMS WHICH MAY BE REGARDED AS UNFAIR"

    (e) requiring any consumer who fails to fulfil his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation;

    I think going overdrawn by 28p and being charged a total of £63 is disproportionate in anyone's language. Anoter from being 88p over. Another £63

    Plus a few small debit card transactions that took me £18.58 over, costing me a total of £148.

    I'm going to draft up a prelim. letter to this effect.

    Can anyone pick any holes in this argument?


  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    rhos123 Novitiate rhos123's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2009
    I am in
    on the dca merry go round
    Posts
    444

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    Quote Originally Posted by bigyeti View Post
    I think I've got it.

    Within "INDICATIVE AND NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF TERMS WHICH MAY BE REGARDED AS UNFAIR"

    (e) requiring any consumer who fails to fulfil his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation;

    I think going overdrawn by 28p and being charged a total of £63 is disproportionate in anyone's language. Anoter from being 88p over. Another £63

    Plus a few small debit card transactions that took me £18.58 over, costing me a total of £148.

    I'm going to draft up a prelim. letter to this effect.

    Can anyone pick any holes in this argument?
    hi, i would call this robbery only its legal for Halifaxicon to do it good luck to you and i hope you get every penny back that they have robbed from you.


  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    bigyeti Novitiate bigyeti's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Bigyeti vs Halifax again

    Personally, I think that they are liable for prosecution under section 4-(1) of the Fraud Act 2006;

    1) A person is in breach of this section if he—
    a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person,
    b) dishonestly abuses that position, and
    c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position—
    i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
    2) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.



    The only tricky bit is b) showing that they abused their position dishonestly.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE