Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aviva PPI Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

First I apologise if this is in the wrong place.

 

I have a First Direct Personal Loan taken out some time ago whilst I was in full time employment. When I was made redundant, then subsequently unable to work though ill health, I made a claim on the PPI which was fine, they (Norwich Union at the time, but now Aviva) have been paying the loan for me, that is up until July Last year, when since we have had a dispute.

 

A bit of info before I go on. I have dogs that I show in competition. We breed the odd litter for show stock, which the tax office are also aware of & we are classed as a 'Hobby trade' meaning out outgoings are more than what we receive from selling the odd pup every couple of years. Its a hobby that keeps me from going insane & one that I have had way before I took out this loan etc! I receive treatment for acute depression/stress, my doctor & psychiatrist are aware of my hobby & say its a good thing as it gives me something to focus on, rather than my illness & getting deeper.

 

Anyway, i have to pay for medical certificates to submit to Aviva every 6mths in order for them to pay my installments to First direct. I faxed my last one over in June last year, from the same fax i always have, with the same logo on the fax as there has always been, This logo is the kennel name granted to me by the kennel club.

 

I received a letter some weeks later telling me they were stopping payments as i am working & i was to meet with their agents RPA to conduct an investigation. so I rang their office to be told they had evidence that i had been working & to comply with their request. I asked what they had & they refused to tell me. I stated I was not in employment & had not been since prior to my claim starting. I made the appt with RPA who came to my home. I was asked if i had received legal advice & i said no as i didnt know what it was all about & aviva hadnt told me, other than they had evidence i was 'working', which was untrue.

 

The agent said that i needed to get Legal advice as they are going to stop paying the loan & probably try to sue me for all the money they had paid out on my behalf over the years, due to the fact I have a website, & show dogs!

 

He left our home stating that as i had not received any advice or info on what this was all over, it was unfair to continue.

 

I wrote to Aviva stating what was discussed & they said i would have been told .. no i wasnt!!

 

The short of it all is, even though i have written to them stating I do not work, do not receive any regular income, I go to a show maybe twice a month (sometimes i wont even do that, its been 5mths since my last one so far!) & its also for my benefit of health, I am not a commercial kennel & do not earn hundreds of pounds from my dogs & that a website & a van logo does not constitute a business & that i am home practically 24/7 save for when I have a show to attend, which is a focus for me, they still write back stating that I AM running a business, & that I HAVE to sign consent forme for access to my medical records & also access to the tax records, DWP etc etc ....

 

I am worried sick, i cannot afford to repay them all this money if they go to court, they are completely overlooking that our dogs are pets, no different to anyone else (ok so I may have a few more than the norm, but most are oldies & retired now) I am home all day, practically every day, do not recieve any income of my own, & they are hung up on the fact I have a website & logo on our van & therefore i AM a commercial business!!!

 

Their T & C states work as a paid employment, which i am not getting. They were also not able to send me a copy of the original agreement, only a revised one from when i took out the PPI.

 

Please can someone advise whats best to do? I spoke to a solicitor who told me NOT to sign their forms as it gives them free reign, but to ask what it is they want & I will supply it for them from the necessary sources. I did this, but again they just tell me to sign the forms & make anopther appt with their agents RPA & to supply all bank info & employment records etc.

 

To add insult to iunjury FD know of the dispute & have continued to try & take payments from the Joint account held for the loan installments, which is now overdrawn & they have instructed their solicitors to recover the debt from my husband & myself, even though the loan is in my sole name.

 

Again i was advised they cannot chase my husband as the O/D is in relation to a loan payment they should not have taken, but FD say my husband is also liable for the payments if I cant make them ..

 

Im so worried & confused & apologise for such a long post

 

Kathy

 

ADMIN - PLEASE CAN YOU DELETE THE THREAD I STARTED IN THE GENERAL DEBT ISSUES PLEASE - I POSTED IT IN THE WRONG PLACE http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/248177-aviva-ppi-help.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow this really is a tough one.

I cannot give any legal advice, but i am sure if it came to it in court it would be proved in your favour. Sit tight and see what other info comes this way. I am sure we can find you a solution to stop your worry.

IF YOU FEEL I HAVE HELPED YOU AT ALL PLEASE FEEL FREE TO TIP MY SCALES.

 

NATWEST PPI SUCCESS £490 25/08/09

 

NATWEST PPI 2nd CLAIM WON £1135 02/10/09

 

A & L PPI £395 WON

 

CREATION CLAIM PARTIAL REFUND £1825 01/04/10 NOW OFF TO FOS FOR THE REST

 

BARCLAYCARD STILL PENDING

 

LITTLEWOODS DCA . DEBT WIPED OUT AND CREDIT FILE UPDATED 23/09/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else's thought on this?

IF YOU FEEL I HAVE HELPED YOU AT ALL PLEASE FEEL FREE TO TIP MY SCALES.

 

NATWEST PPI SUCCESS £490 25/08/09

 

NATWEST PPI 2nd CLAIM WON £1135 02/10/09

 

A & L PPI £395 WON

 

CREATION CLAIM PARTIAL REFUND £1825 01/04/10 NOW OFF TO FOS FOR THE REST

 

BARCLAYCARD STILL PENDING

 

LITTLEWOODS DCA . DEBT WIPED OUT AND CREDIT FILE UPDATED 23/09/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried ringing the Ombudsman to see if they can help you or even the Citizens Advice Bureau?

 

Do you not have legal advice with your home insurance?

 

This must be an awful worry for you but unless someone comes along with better advice, I would try the above.

 

Good luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I rang CAB & they said they were not able to help me as i needed a solicitor that specialised in financial matters & they were not qualified enough?

 

I think we do have legal advice with our home insurance, I would need to check, but i thought they would only be able to help with legal matters regarding any claims etc towards our home?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do try ringing the FOS first as that is their role to mediate between yourself and the insurer. They will listen to both sides of the complaint. If that isn't successful, then you would need to pursue it via a legal avenue ie solicitors through legal insurance.

 

If you do have legal protection with your home insurance, it normally covers a broad spectrum of legal areas eg employment law and is not restricted to issues around your home. There are normally rules and time limits etc so check your T&C's or ring your insurance company.

 

Good luck!!

 

I would certainly try the FOS for their opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, i rang the FOS, they say they cannot help me until I receive a final decision from Aviva, who are constantly batting back & forth stating i HAVE to see their investigation agents who want me to sign paperwork giving them full access to my tax records, medical records, DSS & Bank records. & if i refuse to do so, they will have no option but to then take me to court for the money they have already paid out on my claim ...

 

I am beside myself with worry :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a formal complaint to the insurer for their behaviour and non-disclosure of their "evidence". They should be seeking to resolve this without court action and so should present you with the evidence and allow you to rebut it or admit liability. Going to court should be seen as the last resort.

 

Once you've made the complaint, they have 8 weeks to provide a final response. If they issue the response or even if they fail to do so, the FOS can then get involved.

 

Don't fret about court action - they are there to decide what's fair in law and from my own experience, that is what has happened. Don't be afraid of the Courts! When faced with legal action, you should get professional advice (I'm not a solicitor).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well I have contacted the CAB, they cant help me with this at all .. many of the no win no fee solicitors cant as it is not a misold PPI & our 'Legal cover' included in our morgage say they are unable to assist us ..... Aviva has now given their final word in that unless I have the meeting with RPA & consent to them accessing all my records, the account will not be paid .....this is all really getting me down to the point I collapsed a few weeks ago & ended up in hospital through stress of all these issues & the worry of the bank & Aviva chasing me for large sums of money i just cant pay & the offers i am making they are refusing .....:'(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...