yes they appear to be avoiding the effects of the decision in relation to PPI where there is now a duty to pay back

Dougal,

No news yet?; any idea if and when?

Morning all,

Thanks for asking.

Slow progress...but progress none the less. More when I am able to say something - restricted at present for obvious reasons!!

I will say this it is going to affect almost everyone in the UK.

Best wishes to all,

Dougal

PS: It ain't over 'till the fat fella sings....I'm still putting on weight and dusting off the piano!!

Whilst there may be a confidentiality clause - it at least means that Mike Daily may now know what is needed for the Banks to 'cave in' ??

 

Any ideas on that anyone??

Presumably the arguments he is using in these cases he is running are based on what he developed after the Supreme Court decision and which was published on MSE. Obviously they may now be further refined, and that would be the interesting thing to discover.

As Caro has said, and contrary to Ford, I hope more and more cases come to light that have been settled out of court. This would then return us to the position we were in prior to July 2007 and the OFT sticking their oar in, that is with the banks settling as a goodwill gesture before reaching court, possibly even before a claim is issued.

well, the ppi case went in favour!

Morning all,

Thanks for asking.

 

Slow progress...but progress none the less. More when I am able to say something - restricted at present for obvious reasons!!

 

I will say this it is going to affect almost everyone in the UK.

 

 

 

Best wishes to all,

 

Dougal

 

PS: It ain't over 'till the fat fella sings....I'm still putting on weight and dusting off the piano!!

 

 

Honestly Dougal16T you are more complicated than the cryptic crosswords at times:lol:

Affect us positvely OR negatively?

Positive, I would think. Guys, it's best not to push the matter. Best to wait.

Honestly Dougal16T you are more complicated than the cryptic crosswords at times:lol:

 

Affect us positvely OR negatively?

Morning all:

2. Across

Polar opposite to negative.(9)

Well you did ask.........!!??

Believe me as soon as I can say anymore you WILL be told.

As always,

Best wishes to everyone

Morning all:

 

2. Across

Polar opposite to negative.(9)

 

Well you did ask.........!!??

 

Believe me as soon as I can say anymore you WILL be told.

 

As always,

 

Best wishes to everyone

Unless they bankroll you and wrap you up in tissue paper and a confidentiality clause with a good pension to boot!

Unless they bankroll you and wrap you up in tissue paper and a confidentiality clause with a good pension to boot!

There's a Bentley showroom near me.......

.......BUT this case is for everyone and not just me, so it's on with the cycle clips again......!!

Dougal

There's a Bentley showroom near me.......

 

 

.......BUT this case is for everyone and not just me, so it's on with the cycle clips again......!!

 

 

Dougal

 

There's a factory near me

Is there not a further case in motion against BOS or RBS?

Is there not a further case in motion against BOS or RBS?

Sharp v Bank of Scotland plc (http://govanlc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/unfair-bank-charges-update-from-glc.html).

To quote from that link: The case of Sharp v. Bank of Scotland awaits a fresh hearing date.

http://govanlc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/glc-unfair-bank-charges-update-phase-2.html

M1

all hail GLC

Mayb there is a god!!!

all hail GLC

:hail::hail::hail:

Can someone explain exactly why the smileys are so happy....I thought that nothing was leaked...whats going on and why so much happiness...we have not won ANYTHING yet!!!

Read the GLC website

Multiple litigations - the bank won't like this as they can fight

One but they cant fight many

This is the break through and GLC phase 2 will be very very interesting indeed

Good Morning jdes26...'multiple litigations....please rationalise..'

to me its the same old stuff...'mulitple out of court settlements'

That means that GLC will be helping consumers- multiple- to issue court proceedings against there banks with the arguments they have used to win 2 cases!

Correct me if I'm wrong caro?

So you are saying that ONLY GLC have the specific knowledge on how to approach this.....i.e per confidentiality agreement.(well probably his clients as well to an extent i s'pose)

If that is the case he'll be a millionaire...GOOD LUCK to you MIKE DAILLY and God Bless you:lol:

This gentleman appears to be a genuine modern day 'Robin Hood'....LEGEND!!!...but he's not robinn only taking back what is rightfully ours in the first place....

He's the person who seeks justice and he's the one taking the battle to the banks

If he succeeds we ALL succeed

Sounds good to me , go get em Mike.

So you are saying that ONLY GLC have the specific knowledge on how to approach this.....i.e per confidentiality agreement.(well probably his clients as well to an extent i s'pose)

 

If that is the case he'll be a millionaire...GOOD LUCK to you MIKE DAILLY and God Bless you:lol:

 

This gentleman appears to be a genuine modern day 'Robin Hood'....LEGEND!!!...but he's not robinn only taking back what is rightfully ours in the first place....

Thing is m2e, GLC is a charity, so I don't suppose anyone will become a millionaire, and the very fact that we are back to the same old story of banks caving gives rise to the same old situation - they don't want to go to court.

Give it time, and when it's been more thoroughly tested I'm sure that we'll be hearing a lot more about how it's being done.

Obviously it would be best tested in court, but one step at a time.