Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
all hail GLC
HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006
THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU
We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain
A live Site - Make a Donation
All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.
However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.
Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.
Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007
Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06
Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007
Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
Can someone explain exactly why the smileys are so happy....I thought that nothing was leaked...whats going on and why so much happiness...we have not won ANYTHING yet!!!
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
Read the GLC website
Multiple litigations - the bank won't like this as they can fight
One but they cant fight many
This is the break through and GLC phase 2 will be very very interesting indeed
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
That means that GLC will be helping consumers- multiple- to issue court proceedings against there banks with the arguments they have used to win 2 cases!
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
So you are saying that ONLY GLC have the specific knowledge on how to approach this.....i.e per confidentiality agreement.(well probably his clients as well to an extent i s'pose)
If that is the case he'll be a millionaire...GOOD LUCK to you MIKE DAILLY and God Bless you
This gentleman appears to be a genuine modern day 'Robin Hood'....LEGEND!!!...but he's not robinn only taking back what is rightfully ours in the first place....
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
Originally Posted by means2anend
So you are saying that ONLY GLC have the specific knowledge on how to approach this.....i.e per confidentiality agreement.(well probably his clients as well to an extent i s'pose)
If that is the case he'll be a millionaire...GOOD LUCK to you MIKE DAILLY and God Bless you
This gentleman appears to be a genuine modern day 'Robin Hood'....LEGEND!!!...but he's not robinn only taking back what is rightfully ours in the first place....
Thing is m2e, GLC is a charity, so I don't suppose anyone will become a millionaire, and the very fact that we are back to the same old story of banks caving gives rise to the same old situation - they don't want to go to court.
Give it time, and when it's been more thoroughly tested I'm sure that we'll be hearing a lot more about how it's being done.
Obviously it would be best tested in court, but one step at a time.
Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.
Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007
Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06
Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007
Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.
Re: Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges
No t5hink its two - Sharp v Clydesdale, as well (now) Reid and BOS. Walls, last I heard, was heading to the ECHR on the basis that the refusal of the Scottish Legal Aid Board to grant legal aid when the Bank had taken the case out of summary cause (exposing the claimant to unlimited expenses if they lost), was a breach of Human Rights. Like many ECHR cases, goodness only knows when there will be an outcome.
Taking Sharp and Reid together with the news earlier that GLC is moving toward stage 2 where multiple cases will be brought, presumably on the same bases as Reid and Sharp, is significant progress. Clearly the banks - as they often dont - didnt want to take their chance on their day in court. Having used a variety of scare and delay tactics, they have decided to fold. It would be interesting to learn what issues were raised for Sharp and Reid, but given the agreement that has been struck with the bank that is impossible. However, when multiple cases start going in (and not just in Glasgow?), strategies of delay and causing concern, simply wont work and the banks will either have to decide whether to be dragged through court any number of times to either lose or give up at the entrance to the court (which is going to impose costs on them no matter what), or do the decent thing and return the money they have in effect stolen to their customers.