Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
    • moved to the debt self help forum. plenty of like threads here to read along with the ones you've done so far..good work. last thing you ever want to do is look at any kind of IVO/BK or anything alike concerning consumer debt, never do that, turns unsecured debts into secured ones in many instances. your best bet for now is p'haps looks at  Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) sadly you have to go thru one of the free debt charities to invoke that but DON'T be tempted to also open up a DMP with them, just get the Breathing Space done. get that in place that gives you at leasy 60 days buffer you've also goto to realise you'll probably get a default once breathing space is in place, bit if not it might pay you to withhold payments even after BS then p'haps re start payments once a DN for each debt is issued and registered. at least that way, whatever happens in 6yrs the debt will drop off dx  
    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Actionfraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Past Due Credit Solutions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, it's been a while since I've had to refer to this site as I thought my dealings with DCA's were finished.

 

Received a letter from the above today telling me to telephone them regarding an important matter, on an 0844 number. All that was referred to was a case number nothing else.

 

Previously I had dealings with Robinson Way and Lowell but these were referred to Trading Standards as they had both failed to supply the necessary CCA and had continued harassing me. I eventually received letters from both those companies saying the matter was closed.

 

I don't have any debts that I am aware of and wonder if PDCS are trying where Lowell and Rob Way failed.

 

Any advice on what to do next would be greatly appreciated.

 

Cheers

 

Soozisioux:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi have now received letter number two from the above. Dated 12th February but received today, the 18th Feb This informs me that it is a FORMAL DEMAND. The Pursuer is TT1 SPC for SP1 for an amount of £419.54. If I do not pay by the 19th Feb they will send the "heavies" round. There is a case number and client ref number on the letter and various ways I can pay.:mad:

 

I have no idea what this debt is for. It's an amount that I don't owe anyone and what TTI SPC for SP1 stands for I have no idea.

 

I have two debts outstanding but not for that amount. Both are statued barred (at least ten years if not more) and neither have CCA's for proof.

 

Any help would be gratefully received.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent them a letter asking them to prove the debt.

DO not acknowledge and include a trespasses will be shot letter.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TTI SPC for SP1

 

from another forum

 

I got the letter too. It's from before I even lived here! Apparently British Gas sold the debt to a company called TTI SPC who have now employed pastdue credit to collect it for them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.

 

I am not with British Gas, I changed three years ago to a different utility supplier. All bills were paid completely up to date and I would have thought that if I owed British Gas any money they would have been harassing me themselves immediately, not leaving it years down the line.

 

Cheers Soozisioux

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i said ask them to prove the debt. Deny all knowledge.

 

Also l would contact british gas and ask them about any debt as if they in writing say you dont have one then at least you can send PSDC a copy of the letter and they can then take it up with british gas.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I've been having a look round the net and found a bit more out about TTISPC - they seem rather secretive!

 

TTISPC has a one-page website at www.ttispc.com - advertising their services. They buy debt from banks and other companies (doubtless at a huge discount) and derive their revenue stream from collecting these debts. (As mentioned by PGH7447)

There is a problem with the way TTISPC holds itself out as a UK business (it shows a Nottingham PO Box on its website). If you trade in the UK you are required to show what type of business entity you are - eg plc, Ltd Co, partnership, sole trader etc. TTISPC does not do this on its website.

whois.domaintools.com/ttispc.com shows the website is registered in Grand Cayman (not well-known for its business transparency!) and hides the registrant details through Direct Privacy Ltd (www.directnicprivacy.com). There is a phone number (1-345-745-6022), though this will only get you through to Direct Privacy Ltd.

TTISPC.COM was registered at 123-REG.CO.UK on 09/18/2008.

 

TTISPC may have a reason for remaining incognito - I wonder what it could be?!

 

Cheers Soozisioux:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DONT ring the phone number its not a UK number > George Town, Grand Cayman

 

see below

 

Registrant: directNIC, LTD PO Box 11207 George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1008 KY 1-345-745-6022 Fax:1-345-745-6023 Domain Name: DIRECTNIC. ...

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's ok I've no intention of phoning this number. But I wonder about the whole legality of this set up and what Trading Standards etc., would make of this. How can they threatening people with debts that don't exist when TTISPC claim to be in Nottingham and are actually in Grand Cayman.:confused:

 

Cheers Soozisioux

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back to pdcs and say that you do not recognise the alledged owner of the debt and that after further enquiries you have discovered they are an offshore business and that at no time have you ever had dealings with an offshore company and that until proof of any debt is recieved all further comunications will be passed to trading standards, as you believe this is a [problem]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just been reading another link re the above by Continuity Girl who advised anyone dealing with this lot to contact Consumer Direct which I have just done.

 

I explained everything I had found out and they were extremely interested. Especially as they appear to be flouting Data Protection Regulations. The lady I spoke to was most interested in the "offshore" side of the dealings. She took as many details as I had as is contacting Trading Standards on my behalf.

 

I was advised to write back and deny any debt and tell them to stop contacting me and that any further communications would be reported to the information commissioner.

 

Well worth the phone call and very satisfying too.

 

Will keep you updated of any further events.

 

Cheers Soozisioux:p:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a look on the ICO website and could not find any registration as a data controller.....

 

 

Is this another company like Phoenix Recoveries????

 

 

t-star

FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE NSA USING THE PRISM SYSTEM. HELLO FROM THE UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...