Thread: rbs in trouble again

Very interesting, but something we always knew, a bank if it is to recreate an "executed agreement" will always do so in favour of itself. i.e. if the original wasn't compliant in as much as it missed prescribed terms, you can pretty much guarantee they'll all be in the recreated document.

Essentially agreements that some have deemed fraudulently recreated should not be allowed - end of.

But the problem is how does the customer KNOW the agreement has been fraudulently recreated unless they have retained the original?

Frankly it staggers me that the organisation wouldn't keep exact copies...