If at the time of the agreement this was your COPY for your own keep...then there needs to be NO
signature
..ONLY on the one you SENT BACK to them...this would satisfy the requirement in s61(1)...IF there is NO signature ALSO on the one you sent back...THEN it has not been properly executed according to s61(1) and can only be enforced through Courts by courtesy of section 65.
The powers of the court are contained in s127
IF your agreement was made AFTER the repeal of s127(3) then unless there has been no prejudice to you even IF there are prescribed terms missing it may still be enforceable under 127(1)...This is because the Court's now have a DISCRETION to enforce whereas before they were BOUND not to.
Agreements made before the repeal and in which there
''is a sum that is or may or will become payable'' before and at the time and after the repeal will still be able to call upon the protection under s127(3)
Your agreement will be regulated by both
Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983 SI 1553 AND
Consumer Credit Agreements (Amendments) Regulations 2004 And Consumer Credit( Notices of Cancellation and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983
in relation to FORM AND CONTENT of Agreements. These regulations tell you what MUST be included in the agreements AND what information can be omitted under the powers given to Secretary of State under s180 Consumer Credit Act 1974.
Look up into your message I have highlighted
''WHAT YOU SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR''
LOOK FIRSTLY TO CCA 1974.
AS YOURS IS A RELATIVELY RECENT AGREEMENT THE LEGAL DRAUGHTSMEN SHALL HAVE LEARNT BY NOW FROM THEIR PREVIOUS MISTAKES.DO NOT BE SURPRISED THAT YOUR AGREEMENT IS
FIT FOR PURPOSE.
THE OLDER THE AGREEMENT THE MORE LATITUDE EXISTS FOR NON-COMPLIANT COPIES.
m2ae
