Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

insurance cancelled without telling me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2008 - 2009 insurer # 3 Co-Op CIS insurance - I see other people have had this from the Co-Op aswell.

2007 - 2008 insurer # 2

2006 - 2007 insurer # 1

 

A year ago I took out car insurance with insurer # 3, they wanted the

no claims letter, and I told them by phone I was aware they wanted it

and it will be with them soon. The problem was xmas post and possibly

a postal strike (can't remember). The other problem was insurer # 2

sent me the wrong figure on the first letter they sent me.

 

I phoned insure # 2, and asked for a correct new letter to be sent.

Whilst I was on the phone with them they said they had lost my proof

of no claims that I had given them a year ago, they asked who I was

insured with prior to tthem and they then picked up the phone (whilst

I was on hold) they phoned insurer # 1 and came back to me with that

information confirmed and they were now happy to send me an ammended

no claims letter. The guy on the phone also said "why doesn't your

current insurer just phone us and we'll tell them?"

 

I phoned back insurer # 3 and said "why don't you phone insurer # 2

and confirm it by phone?" They replied

"We don't do that"

 

Anyway the letter arrived and I sent it to them (1st week of January),

I told insurer # 3 by phone "I have just sent it to you". I heard

nothing further from them and assumed everything was ok.

 

Come renewal time they sent no renewal, so when I phoned them to ask

why and for a new quote, they said they had cancelled my policy in 1st

week March 09, and had sent a letter in 1st week Feb 09. They say

they deducted about £60 from the remainder of the premium and refunded

me about £70 at the time.

 

Now when I go to "gocompare" I have to say "yes" - "I have had

insurance refused, cancelled, or recinded" which means 99% of

insurers on that site will not insure me including Insurer # 3 but

insurer #3 on the phone was wanting to insure me when I phoned them

last week (I refused).

 

When I asked insurer # 3 for a full refund of the pro rata 9 months

premium assuming I now forward to them again another copy of no claims

from insurer # 2, they refused. They also said I have nothing to

worry about re: having insurance "cancelled" by them because it was

only "cancelled" and not "refused or recinded". What they don't seem

to understand is that I now cannot answer "no" to that question on

gocompare and other similar websites.

 

I told them that:

*had they just phoned insurer # 2 at the time (like insurer # 2 had

phoned # 1) none of this would have happened

*I did not recieve any letters from them after December

*I would expect to not only have been sent a letter of 1 months notice

but ALSO a letter saying "your policy is now cancelled here is your

refund less deductions" And that I recieved neither letter.

*They have on record my phonecall 1st week Jan saying "I have just

sent it to you"

*I want this "cancellation" revoked somehow so I can answer "no" to

that question

*I want a letter of no claims from them after I have sent them the new

letter from insurer # 2

 

 

What I need to know is what can I do in regards to getting the

deducted money returned to me.

And also in having this "cancellation" black mark against my name

removed?

 

They also made no effort to get the insurance certificate back from me.

Edited by Wig
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your insurance was not cancelled.

 

Your insurance was stopped and a refund for time not on cover was returned to you.

 

If they had cancelled the insurance(in the definition they are using the word) there had to be a reason for it, such as you answering the questions frauduently.

 

Answer no to the questions in the comparison sites, but for your own piece of mind call the quote you want to accept and explain you had insurance stopped as they did not recieve your NCB in time. You should be phoning to accept a quote anyway as you often can get the price lower than the comparison site anyway.

 

For the record, I have not passed on proof of NCB for any of my cars or my bike for the last 8 years. Any request for it results in the insurer being told to call the previous insurer or look on the national database which is paid for by a chunk of my insurance premium ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...