Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Direct Line NCD ripoff


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4802 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I recently received my renewal notice from Direct line after one of my named drivers had a 'fault' accident right at the start of the policy. When I took out the insurance I checked the '9 years NCD' box on the internet form ( I have actually got well over 30 years without a claim ) and I now discover that this has been adjusted to 3 years NCD because of the claim. Direct line wrote that this is because they have a maximum of 5 years NCD on thier policies and I have lost two because of the claim. Seems grossly unfair that!!I realise that a claim will affect it but 6 years! I have now sent two letters ( the last one recorded delivery a nonth ago) questioning the decision but have not received a reply. Any suggestions would be most welcome. (Named driver is now insured in his own name)

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 years is the maxium discount most insurers will give (not sure who would offer more)think LV offer 70% not sure if that also equates to 5 years.

 

although i do see your point, if you supply evidence of 9 years ncd and all docs say if you have a claim we will reduce your ncd by 2 years this shoud be 7 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

their website states::

 

"Every year you hold a policy in your own name without making a claim, you build up a no claims discount which saves you money.

 

If you go on to accept a policy with us, you will be asked to provide proof of your earned no claims discount.

 

This proof should be a renewal notice from your previous Insurance Company, or a letter on headed paper from the Insurance Company.

Every year you hold a policy in your own name without making a claim, you build up a no claims discount which saves you money.

 

In certain circumstances we may be able to obtain this for you.

 

N.B. This no claims discount can only be used on one policy at any one time, and must have been used on a policy within the last two years."

 

the online policy documents are also vague:

 

No Claims Discount

 

"However, if a claim is made against your policy, we may reduce your no claims discount."

 

 

Was there a scale on your schedule showing how they step back you ncd years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again. This looks to be another of those grey areas favoured by grey people wearing grey suits. Have found a section that states that over 50s ( thats me alright) 'may be' entitled to 70% but can't find anything definite on NCD reductions. Maybe it's dependant on the scale of the claim- if you total a roller they knock off 30% but only 10% for a beat up Punto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The scale of discounts for Direct Line is as follows:

 

· One year - 30%

· Two years – 40%

· Three years – 50%

· Four years – 60%

· Five years – 65%

· Five years + and p/h aged over 50 – 70%

 

This means if you have been claim free for 10 years you will be entitled to 70% discount.

 

You will loose 2 yrs ncb per claim you make. example if you have 70% (5 years or more) discount and make a fault claim, you will have 50% (3 yrs) discount at renewal. The cost of the claim does not make a difference at all.

 

After 4 years, you can protect your NCD for a small extra premium. You can make 1 claim in any year or 2 claims in any 3 year period, and you won't lose your ncb.

Edited by kayco
pncb
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty standard across the board to be honest. Step back has always been applied from 5 years to 3 years regardless. Has been the case since I worked in insurance 15 yrs ago, and has been the case with DL since they started.

 

It is not a rip off, in fact if you were able to see the underwriting load due to the claim if it was indeed minor, then you would probably find DL are limiting the increase and applying some discretional discounts. In effect they will prob be competitive in renewal prices.

 

Phone ANY company, tell them you had one fault claim on the policy with an unprotected bonus which had started that year at 9 plus. Every single one will tell you it has stepped back to 3 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I started with direct line in 2007 i had 9 Years NCB,i had an accident in 2008,2010 one fault one pending since my renewal in feb 2011 i have been told my NCB is 2 Years is this Right?as both been classed as fault accidents that means i would have lost 7 years for two minor accidents,I have demanded my legit NCB they refuse too give can somebody help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I started with direct line in 2007 i had 9 Years NCB,i had an accident in 2008,2010 one fault one pending since my renewal in feb 2011 i have been told my NCB is 2 Years is this Right?as both been classed as fault accidents that means i would have lost 7 years for two minor accidents,I have demanded my legit NCB they refuse too give can somebody help?

 

Yes DL are correct. Although they may note the NCB as 9 years, the max NCB is usually 5 years and this is what the deduct from if you have a fault claim. So you were knocked back 4 years for the 2 fault claims and have gained a year for a year you were claim free for.

 

You can work it out for yourself, as you know the claim dates and the dates the policy runs from. Just ignore 9 years and deduct from 5 years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of insurance products offer up to 10 or 11 years NCD now, and plenty of others, even though their discount doesn't increase once you go beyond 5 years, will still use a higher number with regard to calculating step-back.

 

You should always read the policy booklet before purchasing insurance.

 

 

If you are unhappy with how your NCD has been stepped back then find a broker / insurance company that will make an exception.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...