Thread: Your MP

You have a member of parilament for your area. You have been a victim of unfair charging by the banks.
Have you written to your MP?

Why not?

It doesn't take very long to do. Just complain that the banks are flouting the law and ignoring the OFT report.
Do't be fobbed off by the first standard letter.
Write and tell your MP that his/her repsonse is a standard rep;ly and you want something better.
If you receive a reply then post it here so that we can all compare.

In fact tell your MP that you are going to post it here.

It is quite straightforward to put some gentle pressure on your MP

Hi Bankfodder
I love the idea for this section.
I have a thought is there an MP who is sympathetic to our cause if so then we could get the members of this site to write to this particular MP and if he/she got enough response would be duty bound to bring this up in parliment,
also maybe we could have an electronic petition based on this site? to back this up?
I would appreciate your thoughts
Regards
Adamski

Hi Adamski,

When writing to an MP it has to be your own, otherwise they just tell you to write to your own. I did this about 10 years ago and it was on the very subject of bank charges too! I chose a neighbouring MP because I thought he would be more sympathetic, but unfortunately not. When I did write to my own MP he wrote back stating if I had an individual complaint I should take it up with the Banking Ombudsman whereas I had asked him to raise the fairness of bank charges in Parliament with a view to changing the law. (Well I was young naive and keen).

As you can tell my one woman campaign was unsuccessful. But I'm sure the more people that do this the greater the impact. With all the letter writing people have done on here one more should not be too much to ask?

We should all commit to write to our respective MPs

Hi Bankfodder.

I wrote to my MP (Tony Wright) about all this and got a reply. Not sure if it's a "stanard" reply that some MP's give out. He wrote....

"....I agree with the sentiments expressed in your letter and have written to Ed Balls MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, raising these concerns and to see what action can be taken. I will contact you again when i receive a responce....."

Like i said i'm not sure what other MP's have said to people, he sounds convincing but who knows...

PS. Just spotted CAG on wikipedia. Search: Bounced check You'll get a few lines about the OFT and about the charges plus a link to CAG.

Hi Bankfodder,

Hope you don't mind, but I thought more people might be willing to write to MP if the template letter was to hand when reading this thread so I've copied and pasted it here to save them looking. I've also added a couple of points which I feel are valid and should be bought to Parliament's attention. I've put them in purple pending your approval. Will remove if you object or change to black if you approve. Have also swapped the last two paras as seemed to make more sense with the additions. Again hope you don't mind I can always return to original state if you desire. Hope you don't think I'm being cheeky!



Insert MPs name*
House of Commons,
Westminster,
London. SW1A 0AA

Or constituency address.

Dear Insert MPs name,


I am writing to you to ask you to let me know what your views are on the serious problem of unlawful penalty charges which are levied against their customers by the UK High Street Banks.

It is a well established rule of Common Law that contractual penalty charges which exceed the actual losses suffered, in this case by the banks when a customer exceeds limits or a direct debit or cheque are returned, are invalid and will not be enforced by the Court. A series of judicial decisions going back over 100 years shows this to be true.

More recently, The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 has confirmed that a disproportionate penalty would be an example of an unfair term and that this would therefore be unenforceable at law.
The Director General of the Office of Fair Trading announced in 2005 that any penalty charge which exceeded actual losses was disproportionate.

Yet despite this, the Banks continue to apply these charges, and of course the vast majority of bank customers accept the banks’ authority that these excessive charges are valid and they pay up without a lot of fuss.
It is not possible that the banks do not realise what they are doing?

A survey reported this year by the BBC and others, concluded that one in five bank customers suffered from these charges in 2005. This is a large proportion of your constituency. Most of these people have incurred penalty charges because they are in difficulty. Many of these people are vulnerable and already have difficult lives. The spiralling effect of bank charges makes it very difficult if not impossible for these people to escape debt and the brunt of the charges is disproportionately placed on the poorest members of society.

The banks practice of pursuing the poorest members of society to subsidise Free Banking for the rich creates a kind of converse Robin Hood situation and not only runs counter to sound business practice, but also demonstrates the gross inequities and unconscionable behaviour of the banks.

The problem to some extent has been exacerbated by measures sanctioned by Parliament in pressing those in receipt of benefits and old age pensioners to open bank accounts to receive their benefits and thus exposing them to the risk of incurring penalty charges.

The OFT, which is empowered to investigate, shows signs of being reluctant to do so.

Many people have taken legal action against the banks. The banks almost never go to court. Fearing a formal judgment against them they bluff and threaten, but eventually settle before the day of the trial. This amounts to an outright abuse of the court system and their behaviour is in direct contradiction of the overriding objectives set out in the Civil Procedure Rules. Through the Internet sites at www.ConsumerActionGroup.c o.uk and also at www.BankChargesHell.co.uk I am in touch with many people who are challenging the banks, some of whom are beginning legal actions.

The Unlawful Penalty Charge racket is apparently worth £3 billion per year. It is not surprising that they are not anxious to give it up. In taking it upon themselves to penalise, or put more simply punish, their customers they are usurping the power of Parliament. Only an elected body in any civilised democratic society should have the right to impose a punishment. The punishment here being particularly barbaric given that often the only crime is being poor.

Can you think of any reason why, by their dominant position the UK, banks should hold themselves above the civil rule of law and demonstrate such a blatant disregard to the OFT, the civil justice system, their customers and indeed Parliament?

I would be grateful if you would reply to me and let me know what your views about this are, and what steps you would be prepared to take to bring this scandal to an end.

Thank you for your time.

Yours sincerely,


Your signature

(if any body has any figures on current benefits or pensions could include this as an example to demonstrate the suffering imposed by a say 39 quid bank charge+ 28 for going over limit... I know there is discretion to have these set aside in some instances but do the people in receipt of these benefits generally know this? or should this just be left alone completely).

Zootscoot

FWIW mostr banks appear to have 'rules' designed to reduce the opportunity for a customer to have charges removed.

I believe the Abbey imposes a once a year/once in six months. This may not be a formal 'rule' but i have been told this over the phone before.

Im not sure this helps any but it appears to be specifically aimed at discouraging custoemrs from challenging the imposition of charges on an account.

Glenn

PS just going to copy and send sai letter.

JC

I emailed her this very afternoon.

To be honest Im pretty disappointed, she hasnt responded and it was almost 4 hours ago since I emailed her!!

You said they check their email regularly and from anywhere, why hasnt she respondend??

Glenn

PS : wheres the tongue in cheek emoticon?

Originally Posted by JonCris

Yeah right!

MINE always responds so there! Even if its' the auto response "sorry on my hols" To be fair mine HAS responded whilst on holiday.

Conclusion? You must have a lousy MP so move

Ill get back to you on that!!!

here is a copy of what I sent my MP

Sir, I am very concerned over the unlawful practice that the high street banks are conducting regarding there regime of bank charges. As you may be aware, the OFT ruled that credit card companies and bank were making enormous profits from their charges which are a breach of contract law and imposed regardless of circumstances. I would like to draw your attention to Abbey Plc who are proving particularly difficult in a number of areas. Firstly they are refusing to comply with the Data Protection Act by claiming their filing system for statements is not a relevant system under DPA rules. Secondly, they are abusing the county court system by delaying all actions against them to the final day insisting on every delay tactic they can before settling out of court. Their actions and the similar actions of other banks are causing considerable hardship to thousands of people daily. I urge you to ask questions and support the Consumer Action Group in their campaign. www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk I would value your response and support in the same way I support you in your campaign.

Hi , I think it's all well and good writing to your MP to keep the pressure up, so that they take action eventually.

But what about writing to our Euro MP as these companies especially credit card ones operate in many EU countrys besides the UK, and charge minimal charges in many compared to the £30-40 we get ripped of by, there must be some protection in EU law which prevent them from doing this.

I'm currently going head to head with CitiCards and am trying to find out what penalties they apply in Germany and Spain, I've been told by some foreign co-workers that the charges are really small compared to here in the UK.

I totally agree, but the more uncomfortable it is for them the better for us the consumer, let's turn the screws tighter.

And with the government in the crap at the moment maybe time to get a monster pertion underway, one to the brussels lot and to our idiots in power.

This is the reason we have the disparity like this, look in the post below.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...arges-eec.html