Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

woman over white line hits us


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well been stung by a lady drinking.

we was on our way home Helen driving (named driver)

Helen started taking a right hand bend the long side.

woman coming down to wards us is over the white line car in front swerves and carrys on bang our wing mirror gone. Helen slams on brakes stops the car then i get out other woman trying to drive of.

catch up with her grab the keys she is rude and obnoxious claiming we had hit her. police called as she refused to give details police come details given she is breath tested and only just passed as she had been drinking.

she said to me she would pay cash for mirror etc that was sat night today wed get a letter in from AA insurance she is claiming for drivers wing mirror and wing on her 306. funny thing is police noted damage to cars 306 none maybe a scratched mirror ours wing plastics around arch and mirror and small scratch on rear panel. so i ring Quinn where now claiming for mirror arch and paintwork on rear of quarter panel. where going full swing i got photos of the lane and found the glass for the mirror at the side of the road near impact so that Tally's photos etc. does any one happen to know the main dealer price for black arch and a color coded wing mirror.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i just rang the woman she is going to sighn a letter with her name on to let it drop she admited no damige again on her car. i said as long as she drops it then i will drop it i also told her that there was police notes noting damige to our car and not hers. i have had ours fixed keeping the old parts and it cost us a grand total of £20 to fix as its a old car not worth going throu the insurance for this amount or even genuwin new parts as car will be lucky to last one year.

any one have any idears on a letter i can type of to say that both partys are taking no action so we can send this to our insurance companys if there pesuing us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to check your policy, if you've got MLP then your next course of action should be to A/ cease all communication with the other parties insurers and them direct and B/ ake a claim under the MLP and let them do their work, it's what you paid them for (assuming you have MLP) in my experience speaking to the other sides insurers is an absolute non starter, they're there to protect the interest of their insured and of course themselves, the more you tell them the more chance they'll have of finding a route out of paying you.

 

Sit down, write down the basics of your claim so as not to forget anything at a later date and keep it to hand and then make a claim

 

See here for a reference

Moneysupermarket.com - LEGAL PROTECTION

  • Haha 1

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only contact from her insurance was a letter to state a claim started for wing mirror when i spoke to her today she had sent the forms of to her insurance company stating no cost as her car was ok so over the next few days i soppose i will find out if she has told the truth. to be honest it would be far more simple to let the whole matter drop than rather risk 50 50 as in most cases its how the claims go for this sort of thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...