Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ebay took money from my account without permission!!!!!!!!


wesleyt43
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my daughter has an account with ebay, she lives in her own home and has her own bank account etc, in August this year as she was away on holiday I used my debit card to make a one off payment onto her account, then in September she sold a few items, all which went well but noticed on her account she had been charged twice for the same sale, she queried this with ebay who said thay were looking into it, her bill was for £247,81 and should have been after removing the double charge made by ebay should have been £152.40, she was sent a bill for the full amount stating that she owed the full amount,

 

she then took advice from the CAB who said she had infact been charged wrongly, so the outcome was she refused to pay her bill until it was sorted, heard nothing back from ebay at this point, on her ebay account it still showed she was beibg told she owed £247.81. Attempted to ring ebay and she was told its being looked into. Then yesterday I went to buy an item using my debit card and it was declined, which was strange so I rang the bank and was told that an amount of £247.81 had been paid as a direct debit payment to ebay, I had not given any authorization to ebay to take this amount or my bank to pay it. I was told by my bank to go to ebay so I rang ebay and was told that th epayment had been made manually on line as it had been before in August (which was when I made a one off payment to my daughters bill,

 

So I rang the bank who said it was showing up as a Direct debit payment not an online payment, so I rang back ebay, put my daughters account up on screen and was told by the ebay person I was talking to to go to the accounts page and click on it which I did , he then said to look at the part on the page where it shows automatic payment method and see what it said, next to it was the word none,

 

he said Oh" and said that I must have set my card up using ebay, so I went back to my bank who said if my card had been set up ebay would have took a small amount to prove it was my account and that this had not showed up anywhere on my account,

 

so back to ebay I went and basically told them they had wrongly took mney from my account and that the only way my card details could have been got by them is when I made a one off payment, at this point he told me to go to the authorities and hung up,

 

Sorry for rambling on but basically ebay have stole money from my account, I have checked allthrough my daughters ebay account and the only bank detalils in it are her own, but since she was overcharged she did get her bank to put a stop on any payments going out to ebay until they correct her bill and resend it to her,

 

yet now I am out of pocket, ebay are refusing to speak to me other than go to the authorites and the bank are just telling me to go to ebay, they are of no help whatsoever, any advice will be really appreciated:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's too much information!

 

If it was your debit card, and you did not make the purchase, then your bank is duty bound to refund it. Complications arise if it is a Maestro, but if Visa there should be no problem. Your issue is with your bank, not the merchany (eBay), and it is they who have to prove to your bank that you authorised the purchase. Now, if you did NOT link your card to your daughters ebay account, it will not show up as one of the payment methods on file. If it does, then either you or your daughter linked it - and your chances of a refund slim.

 

However, if the double charging issue is resolved, then there won;t be a debt and the fee refunded anyway - so why is she not pursuing this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it a Direct Debit payment or not? Your post is unclear. If it's a Direct Debit payment then you're covered by the Direct Debit guarantee and so your bank have to reverse the payment immediately if you ask them to do so.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for responding, at the moment the bank are telling me I have to contact ebay, and request the money back, its a visa debit card, I am at the bank in the morning and have printed pages from my daughter account to take with me, it clearly shows the only payment method on her account is her own card, she has also sent in copies of the double charge to ebay where it shows that for one sale 2 charges were made on her seller account for each sale she made, at the moment she is still waiting for ebay to get back to her, (the payment they took was for a sale not a purchase and she was disputing this bill with the double charges on it), my card is not linked to my daughter account anywhere. Another matter is that there was only £62.00 in my bank yet my bank still let it go through, I have since also found out that ebay attempted to take the funds from my account 3 days earlier and it was declined so why my bank allowed it to go through only they can explain, Thans for the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I know I rambled but I was so angry, it was took from my account as a direct debit payment. I did ask the bank yesterday to reverse it and I was told that I have to get an admittal from ebay that they took money from my account without my permission and only then they will get me to complete a form for a very lenghty process or so I was told my bank is the halifax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a lot of knowledge of this sort of thing but, surely if your bank are saying they have correctly given money to Ebay from your bank account by direct debit then they must be able to show that you have sent them a direct debit mandate to allow this.

 

No DD mandate no legitimate transaction and no leg to stand on for the bank?

 

Apologies if I am wrong.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a lot of knowledge of this sort of thing but, surely if your bank are saying they have correctly given money to Ebay from your bank account by direct debit then they must be able to show that you have sent them a direct debit mandate to allow this.

 

No DD mandate no legitimate transaction and no leg to stand on for the bank?

 

Apologies if I am wrong.

 

Feebee_71

 

Thank you, I never even thought of that , have been totally brain dead due to being so angry, I am at the bank at 9 in the morning, will let you know how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direct Debit guarantee scheme puts the onus on the paying bank to refund the account holder.

 

The suggestion that the a/c holder gets ebay to admit blame is total b*ll*cks!

 

There is no requirement whatsoever for you to chase this, it is for ebay to prove they were entitled to take it.

 

March back into Halifax and demand that they raise a Direct Debit Indemnity against ebay and to refund the disputed amount into your account. They have a statutory 48 hours to do this or be in contravention of the rules. There will be a requirement for you to complete and enquiry form in order to get full details of the disputed payment but it shouldn't be too long.

 

They have no leeway whatsoever in this, there's no discussion its a straight refund. Once you have reported the problem they refund you and then pursue ebay for the money. Its then up to ebay to contact you to argue about how much you may or may not owe them.

 

Don't be a victim here - be very firm and polite but stick to your guns on this, they must refund you, no ifs or buts!

 

here's a useful link, but there are many others. http://www.bacs.co.uk/bacs/businesses/directdebit/collecting/pages/customersrights.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I never even thought of that , have been totally brain dead due to being so angry, I am at the bank at 9 in the morning, will let you know how I get on.

 

Good luck,

 

I will look in when I get home from work in the morning and see how things went at the bank.

 

Feebee_71:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direct Debit guarantee scheme puts the onus on the paying bank to refund the account holder.

 

The suggestion that the a/c holder gets ebay to admit blame is total b*ll*cks!

 

There is no requirement whatsoever for you to chase this, it is for ebay to prove they were entitled to take it.

 

March back into Halifax and demand that they raise a Direct Debit Indemnity against ebay and to refund the disputed amount into your account. They have a statutory 48 hours to do this or be in contravention of the rules. There will be a requirement for you to complete and enquiry form in order to get full details of the disputed payment but it shouldn't be too long.

 

They have no leeway whatsoever in this, there's no discussion its a straight refund. Once you have reported the problem they refund you and then pursue ebay for the money. Its then up to ebay to contact you to argue about how much you may or may not owe them.

 

Don't be a victim here - be very firm and polite but stick to your guns on this, they must refund you, no ifs or buts!

 

here's a useful link, but there are many others. http://www.bacs.co.uk/bacs/businesses/directdebit/collecting/pages/customersrights.aspx

 

 

Thank you so much for this very helpful response, they take one look at me in a wheelchair and think that they can take the p,,, I was so angry, now calmed down and ready for in the morning, bank app at 9.00am will be back and let you all know how I get on, thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, you need to clarify the payment method as you keep switching from saying it was via a Visa debit card and then saying it was a Direct Debit - which is it?

 

If it was a Direct Debit, then all you need to do is quote the Direct Debit guarantee to your bank, which reads as follows:

 

If the amounts to be paid or the payment dates change, the organisation collecting the payment will notify you normally 10 working days in advance of your account being debited or as otherwise agreed

If an error is made by the organisation or your bank or building society, you are guaranteed a full and immediate refund from your branch of the amount paid

You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time by contacting your bank or building society. We also recommend you notify the organisation concerned.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I read the OP's first post she made a one-off payment for her daughter a few months ago using her debit card. No authorisation set up after the one-off payment.

 

Recently Ebay sent a direct debit request to the OP's bank account - possibly the one the debit card is linked to - to cover fees that hadn't been paid as her daughter was disputing the amount being charged (double fees for each item sold). Bank (HSBC) paid out on the direct debit. OP goes out shopping and debit card is declined as insufficient funds in the account - due to payment taken by Ebay.

 

OP checks with daughter's account (am assuming Paypal) to ensure debit card/HSBC account are not held on file as alternative payment options. Only OP's daughter's card/bank account are listed.

 

OP disputes direct debit payment with bank - told to take it up with Ebay; complains to Ebay - told to take it up with bank.

 

As I said in my first post on this thread - if the payment is shown as being direct debit then bank have to reverse it as she has never set a direct debit mandate up for Ebay with her bank. If the payment is from debit card then it is an unauthorised transaction - especially as daughters Ebay (assume Paypal) account doesn't list her mum's accounts as being authorised payment methods to daughters accounts.

 

If I have got this wrong in how I am reading this then I apologise for that,

 

Feebee_71 :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record, it is NOT possible for a merchant to turn a card payment into a Direct Debit. As lax as the banking system is, it is still not possible for the merchant to conjure up mandate and claim the acceptance of the cardholder/customer. It HAS to be a 'fresh' transaction, complete with the fll knowledge of the account holder. Previously this required the signature of the account holder (that originally had to be sent to the bank complete with supporting signature) but they must retain this in case of a claim of a mis-applied mandate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, went to the bank, still not happy, the bank said that it is showing as a card payment , not a DD as I was told over the phone, and they cant request it back, I have again been told again to ring ebay, ebay attempted to take payment from my account on the 25th Oct but payment was declined, and they again requested it on the 30th, yet this time it was paid, all the bank have done is open a dispute which I was told will take 120 days, as the payment took us over our overdraft limit and our account has been passsed to collections the only person that gave me some advice was the person from the collections dept who they put me on the phone to in branch, and she suggested that if I contact the fraud dept of our bank and give them the details as the payment is in dispute, it will show once they look into it how the payment was requested on from ebay, as the bank say it was a payment using our card but then we have been told that this will show up if this be the case, on an e-mail from ebay it states

 

Subject:

Action Required -- Credit/Debit Card Payment Declined

Received:

25-Oct-09

From:

eBay

Expires:

10-Nov-10

 

EBay Account ID: xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Card: VISA XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-xxxxxxx

Outstanding Payment Due: £247.81

 

Hello xxxxxxxxxx,

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

eBay sent this message to xxxxxxxxxx

Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

We are writing to alert you that your monthly eBay seller fees have not been paid because credit/debit card declined eBay's attempt to automatically deduct the amount due.

 

 

 

 

Now what this wording means I have no idea and ebay wouldnt tell me, now if ebay attempted to automaticall deduct money from the account which was mine on the e-mail, then surely no one has made a payment on line using my card which is what the bank are still suggesting, now time to ring the fraud dept to see if they can be of help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes it tidier.

 

Now, the issue is how your debit card came to be used in this way (as a registered funding source). You may have inadvertently set this up when arranging to make a payment for a single item, and then did not remove the card after the event.

 

In that situation, eBay are right - it was a linked card to your daughter's account. The details were voluntarily provded by you, so there is no issue of eBay doing anything wrong here. I'm aware of a number of parents allowing their cards to be used in this way because their kids are not old enough to have a credit card - so it is hardly unknown.

 

However, since the issue was all about a vouble (incorrect?) purchase debited twice - why are you not also pursuing this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just got off the phone with for once a helpfull person with ebay and they have actually said that they have no idea why the payment was not took from my daughters bank as her card details are set on her account, and took from mine, which he said is not linked anywhere to her account, they have said they will ring me later on when they have looked into this, as only my daughters card and bank account are linked to her ebay account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That problem of the extra charges were sent in to ebay 5 weeks ago, with print outs showing the charges and sales showing that she had been charged twice on 5 occasions, and they are apparently still looking into it,

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rather worrying the amount of mistakes made by Ebay (and especially Paypal). I find myself again contacting Paypal regarding mistakes made. I know the banks are far from perfect but they certainly are easier to deal with and appear to make far fewer mistakes.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told to ring the police to get a crime number, on speaking to them they said that they could not give me one unless the bank admitted that the payment was wrongly took, but during our conversation he did admit that they had been contacted more than usual about ebay and paypal wrongly taking money from people,

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHO said get a crime number? They really are having a laugh, and just getting you off the phone. This isn;t an issue where a 'crime number' is remotely relevant, as the police have subsequently confirmed.

 

It is also worthwhile to differentiate which of the businesses are cuasing the problem. AIUI, it is eBay that are causing the problems. with PayPal simply the processor - it is important to remember this is there are issues. The holding companies may be similar, but the remedies are different for each. From what has been described so far, the issue is with Ebay alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...