Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Incapacity Benefit: DWP appealing the tribunal's decision?


ee-bee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi i`v just found this forum so not sure where to start,i received a letter today telling me my is had stopped 4 days ago,and i`m at a total loss as what to do now,i`v got spondylitus,in the spine and neck,and i was asked stupid questions like can i answer the phone!where would i find out about a welfare rights worker,many thanks

hi all, well i went to my appeal on tuesday and won,i was awarded 20 points instead of the 3 i originally got,great news i thought,except today i received a letter off thejobcentre plus saying they have requested a full statement of the tribunals reasons for this decision, this means that implementation of the tribunals decision will be suspended while an appeal to the commissioner is considered,i`m so upset and worried,has this happened to any one else on here

ee-bee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They will be requesting a statement of reasons for the decision so they can see exactly why the decision was made; If they believe the first tier tribunal has erred on a point of law, they can apply for permission to appeal to the commisioner. They have one month from the date of the decision to request a statement of reasons and a further month to apply for permission to appeal from when the statement of reasons were sent to them.

 

If they do submit a request leave to appeal, to the upper tier will decide whether the DWP appeal can go ahead.

 

Whilst this is being considered, they can suspend any payment due as a result of the first tier tribunal's decision.

 

They can only appeal to the upper tribunal on a point of law, not on findings of fact or the first tier's medical findings.

 

I have moved your post to its own thread to attract more traffic.

  • Haha 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not "thick". You just don't know what it means, that doesn't mean you're thick. Don't put yourself down.

 

It means there is an error in the way they have applied the law to a case.

 

When a decision to award benefit or decline benefit is made, it is made in accordance with the law that has been set for that particular benefit.

 

So if the DWP feel that the tribunal has wrongly interperated the law or feel the law should be further clarified, they appeal to the upper tribunal.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

i have received the statement of reasons from the tribunal, so i assume the dwp have received theres as well, i`v spoke to my representative and he`s also received one,everything seems okay in the statement but we`ll have to wait and see,i`m assuming they have a month now to decide what their going to do? god its like waiting for christmas:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its now been 2 weeks since the the statement of reasons was issued,i`m getting really frustrated ,waiting for the post every day,i`m begining to think this is going to be a very long drawn out appeal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

Same thing is happening to me with the DLA appeal I won. I,m on a countdown and will contact Tribunal Service a couple of days after the month has expired and if an appeal has not been lodged in time things will get interesting.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Cheers MelissaTeddyBear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

Same thing is happening to me with the DLA appeal I won. I,m on a countdown and will contact Tribunal Service a couple of days after the month has expired and if an appeal has not been lodged in time things will get interesting.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Cheers MelissaTeddyBear

i`m gutted, i thought it was only me it had happened too,it seems its quite an unusual thing for dwp to do,when is your 4 week dead line?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

 

The statement of reasons is dated 2/11/09 so I think that the decision maker has to get the appeal in to the tribunal service by 2/12/09. I contacted Tribunal Service and they said that if an appeal by DWP was received late then it would be very unlikely for a late appeal to be admitted.

They tell me it is quite rare for an appeal to be made to the Upper Tier Tribunal after a Statement of Reasons has been issued but each case is individual therefore there are no guarantees.

 

My claim was made in March this year so I will complain of maladministration. The RNID website says most hearing impaired people get turned down with the initial application for DLA and most are successful on appeal but the DWP no not seem to want to learn. Probably the money saved on refusing applications outweighs the cost of appeals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my case has been a nightmare from beginning to now,first in feb i lost my pca,was given only 3 points,then when asked to look again at my case they said it had gone for re-work as there was a discrepancy with the points,then after several phone calls by me because of the time it was taking they admitted they had lost my file!!a copy was issued to the dm and then they found my file,i ended up with 2 lots of appeal papers,its been one horrible year and i feel like giving up on the whole thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

 

Sounds like you have had a lot to contend with. Sometimes you might imagine the DWP searching for reasons to refer your case to an Upper Tier Tribunal and putting a lot of time and effort in to that. In reality the DWP is understaffed and under resourced to properly do the volume of work they have to process and often in arrears with work. Therefore if you have not heard anything by the end of one month from the date of the statement of reasons it is probably sitting in a pile of work to be processed.

Give up after what you have already achieved getting the tribunal to overturn the DM's decision. Not on your nelly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the support,my statement of reasons was issued on the 4th nov,but because i`v not heard of anyone else having this problem i`v took it quite personal and yes your right i visulize them spending hours trying to find a reason not to give me my money,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee

 

Goes from 1st November to 1st Dec. Goes from date sent rather than date received.

 

You may find the following useful :-

 

www.appeals-service.gov.uk/

Left of page How to appeal Guidance on how ....

Click How to a appeal leaflet

Page 30.

 

The leaflet and website give a good background to the appeals process.

 

No post today.

 

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks for the link,no post here either,i`m sure one of these days someone will go to the papers or press about these medicals,etc,there must be hundreds of appeals going on,it has to be costing someone somewhere a lot of money

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a look around CAG, you'll find lots of people complaining about these medicals, some are taking action.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-?What kind of action weneed to take?

 

Alf:roll:

 

That's a good question. If some people are trying to take matters further it would be good to know. I'd certainly volunteer to help. There are two things that appall me.

Firstly, the low standard of the Atos medical assessment. They had no equipment to assess pulmonary disease, therefore no means to figure out how it would affect my work capabilities.

And secondly, having read all my tribunal papers from the DWP, it is so biased against people like myself who feel they can do some work but just need that bit of extra support.

I will confess to being very annoyed at not getting that extra £25pw premium. Not a lot to someone on fulltime work, but a life changing sum to me. And, lets be honest - should any member of the Government be reading this - it's not as if you're going to have to pay me a state pension, my lungs are saving you money in the long term! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look around by typing ATOS into the search facility to see posts on the subject. You will also find plenty of stories by googling. If you want to discuss this though, please start a new thread in the appropriate subforum rather than cloud over this member's thread, where advice is being sought on the appeals process.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...