Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kirby vacuum cleaner scam


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4844 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now I don't expect for a second that any of you wise people will fall victim to this but I'm hoping that you will spread the word and maybe bear it in mind for any older relatives/friends etc.

You are at home one day when there is a knock at your door. You open it and someone says something like 'we are a new company in the area, would you like to enter into a free prize draw to win a car? All you have to do is give me your phone number to help build up our database'. If you agree and provide your phone number, you are given a small card with a picture of a car on the front.

A few days later you receive a phone call and the caller says something like 'you have won a free carpet clean/carpet shampoo in our prize draw'. If you agree to receive it, an appointment is made for a later date. If the appointment goes ahead as planned, you will realise that the free carpet clean is really just a chance for a salesman to demonstrate a Kirby vacuum cleaner to you for 2 hours or more, all the while criticising your current vacuum cleaner, asking if you are happy to live in filth, putting the fear of God into you about fires caused by dust build-up etc. If you unfortunately succumb to the high-pressure sales pitch, you will find yourself out of pocket to the tune of at least £1,500 and your statutory right to cancel will be denied.

Please remember this and tell anyone you think appropriate - more people knowing about this means fewer people falling victim and the company will be forced to either deal honestly or close down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been running since 1984 - and is hardly new!

 

Thr product itself is excellent - well engineered and does what it says on the tin, BUT having something that lasts 40 years is quite useful, you PAY for this longevity, and if every shopkeeper came to your door to demonstrate a product you can imagine it will cost you more tha if you bought something similar online.

 

ANYONE coming into your home (to sell) will do all they can to make yu buy - that's what salesmanship is all about. The sad fact is some folk cannot say no and can be easily manipulated - this isn't the fault of Kirby who do (or at least did, offer a good product).

 

As always, people need to take responsibilities for their actions - whether double glazing, tarmac laying, fitted bedrooms or vacuum cleaners. 'Just say no' is not difficult to say, neither is 'go away'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beg to differ Buzby, there are vulnerable people who actually do not know how to say 'no' or really know what they are getting in to. I've seen elderly folk conned and what really makes me mad is they feel stupid or foolish! Not everyone had the mental capacity to understand what they are really signing for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your solution is to ban sales calls for the weak-willed?

 

I'm not saying that people in these situations should not be protected in some way - but not after-the-event. Damning Kirby by special mention because some members of the community are unable to say 'no' is not going to happen, especially as commerce is not illegal. It would be up to family/social workers to look after those who are unable to take full responsibilities for their actions.

 

Expecting exceptions to be made because of THEIR inability to take responsibilities of ther action beggars belief. If the firm fails, they take the rap - but if the customer does, you expect the firm to take the blame for this too...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My landlord lives with his mum in a residential home and he is well aware of a lot of dodges, he has quite fun with some of them. Most of the residents in his building ask him to be present if 'salesmen' have tricked them into making an appointment, usually stating he has power of attourney on their funds. Soon sends them scurrying away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was speaking generally rather than being specific to Kirby, but yes, firms should absolutely be responsible for the conduct of their employees and commission-driven salesmen can pressurise into an unwanted sale.

 

Some salesmen are very good at targeting the vulnerable, and would not treat an 18 stone on-the-ball bloke the same as an elderly lady for example.

 

I did once have my carpets cleaned years ago by Kirby as a demonstration but I wasn't that impressed. The only thing that sticks in my memory was that the salesman was rather attractive and I spent a lovely afternoon having a good old flirt! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite agree that calling it a "[problem]" is misleading but their sales methods do leave something to be desired, especially when they cotton on to someone who doesn't know their rights.

 

My tale.

 

Kirby rep knocked on my door and offered me a demo with no obligation to buy, so I said ok.

 

3 hours later, they were still there and after pressure from them and my ex (wonder why she's my ex:)) I signed up for credit. Little did I know the credit was with The Associates at stupid rates.

 

The quoted sale price of the Kirby was £799 (after discount!) but the total including credit was nearly £1500.

 

I didn't get a cooling off period as they delivered the Kirby the next day and I (wrongly) assumed that I was stuck with it.

 

All I say is that if you get a visit from them, be strong. If you don't want one, say so. Don't let the pressure selling get to you. I used to be weak willed and I take full responsibility for my actions, but no more.

anyone comes to my door selling anything gets a short "No Thankyou"

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the scenario above as a sales call. The company state that the person has won a free carpet clean/shampoo. In any situation I don't agree with someone using emotional blackmail or scare tactics to sell a product or service.

 

I agree that if you invite sales people into your home you have to be careful and think in advance about what you want and what you are prepared to agree to. If you are easily intimadated or swayed then it's best that you don't agree to home sales calls wherever possible or have someone else with you at the time of the call. However, this was not an agreed sales call.

 

Not all vulnerable people have someone looking out for them on a daily basis. Not all of them have or need social workers. Just because you can be easily intimadated/frightened because of your age, etc does not mean you need a social worker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing I remember about the sales visit was their insistence of vacuuming my bed. Even after I told them my youngest was having an afternoon nap, the sales girl said that if she didn't do the bed demo, she wouldn't get paid (emotional blackmail methinks)

 

She then got a black cloth from her bag and put it over the hole where the dust bag would usually go, vacuumed the bed and showed me the result (not pretty).

 

What I didn't cotton on to was that once a dust bag is fitted, the amount of suction would be less due to dust clogging up the paper bag inside.

 

Having said all I have, it was a great vacuum and my ex still has it (over 10 years later)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bedroom scenario is the great one - it puts the cutomer on the back-foot, as this is quivkly followed by the photocopied page of what a X5000 magnified bed bug looks like. By showing you the 'dark' tissue that the Kirby deposits after sucking from your bed, you'd be hard pressed not to - but that's part of the technique.

 

I don;t do business on the doorstep, and never have. The Kirby technique is invariably to use referrals from friends - as it gets you the additional discounts. However it isn;t a [problem] (like pyramid selling) which will leave many high and dry.

 

As for their finance arrangements - pay cash (better still, buy off ebay!) but since you could put it on a credit card for cheaper, taking out their finance deal is silly, but no different to taking a similar arrangement when buying a car... it's just another decision to purchase.

 

Slick salesmanship is everywhere, from encyclopaedias to carpet cleaners the hapless consumer needs to keep their wits about them - and trust nobody. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

) I signed up for credit. Little did I know the credit was with The Associates at stupid rates.

 

So you signed up for credit without knowing the APR and your monthly repayments? :eek:

 

You might as well have left your wallet open and given him your cash card and PIN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scams can be doing the rounds years after they originally started.

We cant assume that every Cagger will be familiar with them.

The OP is in a position to know more,since their job deals with these things,and its reasonable to therefore assume that they posted this on the basis that it needed airing at this time.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I was under the impression that the Consumer Protection from Unfair Business Practices 2008,incorporates new legislation to address some of the issues here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what I was going to say, Martin! When some people say this is just a sales technique and that it's people's own fault, they seem to conveniently ignore that it is in fact a specified unfair term under both "false competition prize" AND "false competitions". Obtaining data under guise of entering people into a prize draw to then only pressurise them in booking a demo (which is NOT the same as having won a free clean/shampoo) is also dishonest, and I'd think a breach of the DPA if they're using the data for another purpose than the one to which the subject agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely:)

 

I have a copy of the regs here-I printed them off last year-theres lots of things in there which many people prob are not familiar with.

The examples that are given are good too-in explaining how they apply.

I remember the one about doorstep selling -and not being able to say things like "Burglaries in this area have trebled love...." in the case of someone trying to sell you a burglar alarm.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you agreed that if you are contacted out the blue and told 'you've won a prize', the problem is with the firm for offering, and no blame is attached the the consumer for believing it...?

 

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

 

It's much easier to disbelieve everyone, is save a lot of time and on balance is probably better for you.

 

If rules are badly drafted - and lets face it a lot of consumer protection and other laws are, only a fool would believe it will actually protect HIM, as the enforcement will still depend on lining up the ducks at the various agencies that need to pay for the prosecution costs, and as we know - there's no money anywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raymond can you not at least TRY to post constructively....

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ermmmm... yes?

 

If a company says: "you have won a prize", you have the absolute right to expect to be given a prize, not for someone to try to hard sell you stuff you didn't ask for in the first place.

 

Hardly rocket science.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

 

Never in a million years.....it would mean politicians never being able to utter another sentence.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I WAS being very constructive.

 

My web rowser opens with an adver box telling me I have been selected out of XXXX hits to apply for this free game, utensil or software. Or are you both suggesting that I should believe them and accept their invitation? Or is it that face to face promises should be believed, and not those on the Internet?

 

As for Martin's politician's synicism - my MP (and MSP) are upstanding citizense, so marking out politicians as greater liars than salesmen/women (of which there are no doubt many more) does;nt hold water.

 

Being cautious isn't a gift - being a pillock and believing everything you are told most certainly IS - to the salesman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a world of difference between an ad on the Internet you can just pass by and a salesman parked in your living-room for 5 hours and seemingly not moving until you have given in. Even you must be able to realise that, surely?

 

Regardless of what you believe or not, Kirby are trying to circumvent consumer protection anyway. If they turn up uninvited at the doorstep and flog the product, the consumer is protected. If they get invited (albeit under false pretence) and flog the product, that protection is gone. It seems quite clear that they do know this with the fake prizegiving and appointment making that ensues, which is two-fold: misleading the consumer into thinking he is getting a prize and stripping him of his statutory protection in the subsequent transaction which may ensue.

 

Now why would any reputable company which stands by its product evne try to do that? :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now why would any reputable company which stands by its product evne try to do that

 

Or indeed any upstanding salesmen ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've clearly not had a Kirby salesman. Kirby are not the sellers.

 

This is an american company that are franchise-based (usually area/postcode). They sell to distributors, who sell to area organisers who then sell to the salesforce, who are all self employed, and buy their stock at a discount from the area distributor. Tupperware works in exaclty the same way.

 

Just as Tupperware won;t care about the selling techniques used, Kirby manke vacuum cleaners and sell them to national distributors on an exclusive basis.

 

As for the salesman 'cold calling' - when has this been illegal? If a customer buy's something he doesn't need - just how are you going to blame the seller for that? As for the 'free' offer - I was promised a free floor polish adaptor (worth £400) - but I had to buy the Kirby first (indeed, it would have been pointless as the polisher needed the Kirby to operate!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my mum had a bad fall earlier in the year I have taken to going round on the nights that my dad goes to play snooker.

 

Arriving their one evening about 8pm I noticed a car on their drive with the boot open and a couple of men/lads in their mid 20's at the door.

 

Apparently they were there to give a 'demonstration' . Mum said that they should of been there at 6.30 but had been delayed I took one look at their T-Shirts it had 'Kirby Cleaners' as a logo. I straight away said that they had no need of one as they already had a 'Vax' and if they were in need of carpets being cleaned then me and Mr Saintly would be more than happy to do it for them.

 

They wern't too happy about me turning up and talking mum out of her 'demonstration' but they left within a few minutes of me turning up .

Link to post
Share on other sites

However it isn;t a [problem] (like pyramid selling) which will leave many high and dry.

 

Unfortunately, I beg to differ. It most certainly is a [problem]; the dictionary definition of [problem] is an illegal plan for making money and telling a consumer that you want to enter their home for one thing when your real intention is another is a criminal offence by virtue of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. It IS leaving many high and dry - I am currently dealing with over 40 complaints, hence my wish to inform the general public as per my OP.

 

What's next - legislation to prevent lying?

This has been in place for a while now. See the Fraud Act 2006, more specifically fraud by making a false representation (i.e. lying).

 

If they turn up uninvited...the consumer is protected. If they get invited...that protection is gone.
.

Just to clarify, these Regulations changed in October 2008 - the Cancellation of Contracts Made in a Consumer's Home or Place of Work, etc Regulations 2008 give consumers a 7 day cancellation period when buying at home whether the visit was invited or uninvited.

 

FWIW, I agree with the comments re the Kirby being a quality product, there is no argument there. It is just the way that it is being sold to people in their own homes. I am just asking for businesses to be honest - if you want to sell something to someone, tell them that, don't tell them that you want to give them a prize and that there is no obligation just to get inside their home.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...