Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Missold Income Protection and Critical Illness Policy with Scottish Provident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wanted to just ask if anyone knows how to pursue a missold claim for income protection and critical illness. This is not PPI, it was an assurance policy that was sold to me back in 2003 by a broker, who told me I needed to have this policy in place in order to get a mortgage. However it was not actually linked to the mortgage, hence it is not a PPI policy.

 

My issue with it, is that the income protection was missold, since I was self employed then (and still am) and I would not have been able to claim on it if I was out of work. I paid into it for 4 years in the stupid belief that it would protect me if I was out of work for more than 8 weeks.

 

Do I have any basis to get any refund on the payments I made to this assurance plan? Also as a note, the broker who sold it to me set up without my knowledge a home insurance policy, on a property I never set foot in!! They clearly wanted some extra commission. I only realised 6 months later, when I noticed a direct debit that I did not recognise.

 

Thanks

 

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi blondbombshell:)

 

I'm afraid I can't answer your question but this will bump your post back to the top of the pile.

 

I would like to know the answer myself as my husband and I were also sold a similar product from Scottish Widows (LTSB) when I was a homemaker with no paid employment. In my case this was Critical Illness and Business Cover which appears to have been sold as a PPI substitute by LTSB. Neither my husband nor I had a business so not sure what the purpose of the 'Business Cover' was exactly.

 

Unfortunately we were also talked into this by our bank and being rather naive at the time we fell for their sales pitch which was pretty aggressive:(

 

We haven't done anything about this yet (it was cancelled back in 2007) but your post reminded me it's something that maybe I should be looking into.

 

Hope you get an answer soon!

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,If it is any help i was also mis-sold an Income Protection Policy in 2003 supposedly by Nat West.It turned out it wasn't actually NatWest but a third party who were unregulated by the insurance ombudsman in place at the time.

 

The biggest problem i found was finding out who actually sold the policy because NatWest were bloody unhelpful.

 

Once i found out who sold the policy,i complained to them and they paid out, but only a part of my claim.Had no choice but to accept the settlement due to the unregulated state of the business concerned(i.e.I wouldn't have been able to go to the FOS).

 

I basically approached the complaint along the lines of a PPI complaint and worded it only the lines of being mis-sold the cover when i already had adequate cover in place.As the company that sold the IPP did not have a recording of the telephone sales call(A big NO-NO apparently) my complaint was upheld.

 

Hope this has helped in telling you it can be done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

BUMP... I've also been mis-sold to by Scottish Widows and looking to start my complaint - just wondered whether there were any answers to this thread?

 

Pudst

x x x x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

HI,

I purchased a Mortgage & Business cover plan with Critical ilness from Lloyds TSB (Scottish Widows policy) and due to an accident that left me Disabled (Mobility) I contacted SW to make a claim.

After several phone calls I finally recieved the claim form which was completed and returned.

Several months later SW informed me that they had Voided the policy for Non-Disclosure, I appealed there disision through the FOS and they were told to re-instate the policy as they had read a date in my GP records incorrectly. So again SW revued my claim, but Surprise Surprise they rejected my claim again saying I did not meet the Definitions of the policy.

At the moment I am still looking at what my next move should be, but I have been looking into these types of policies and what I found at first surprised me but after what has gone on in the major Finantial Institutions recently I should not have been.

Millions of these policies have been sold over the years even though the Insurance Industry as a whole have known that these types of policies are FLAWED & contain FLUFFY & CONFUSING DEFINITIONS and that the vast marjority of Financial Advisors do not understand these policies themselves what chance do we have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

This is also of interest to me (I've just googled for mis-selling of Income Protection, and up this came!) I was sold both Income Protection AND Critical Illness by a business banking manager at lloyds WITH ppi on a loan to ensure that I qualified for the loan back in 2000. At that time I was a freelance designer and would go from a week working 60hrs, to weeks without work and my working hours were all over the place. They would never have paid out if I'd claimed.

 

I'm off work today following up on my SAR request for my PPI claim, and I've been trying to get copies of the plan conditions for these 2 protection plans. I've just spoken to a very friendly guy at Scott Wid, who couldn't find any details for me and suggested I write in to request. Frustrating. He did ask me if it related to a PPI claim, as they didn't pay out for Income Protection! It's like banging your head against a brick wall this process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...