Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice please - being investigated by DWP for Benefit Fraud


jast11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband suffers from Parkinson's disease, diagnosed 13 years ago. We have 1 child at home. My husband claims incapacity benefit and gets dla(middle rate) and mobility allowance(highest rate).

I am 49 and have not worked since I was a teenager, have 5 children. We had a really bad time 2 years ago, my 16 year-old daughter walked out of home to stay with her boyfriend. My husbands illness and depression got worse, home-life was hell, and I got very depressed too, years of being a full-time carer and my daughter's situation really wore me down. My daughter had no means of support, boyfriend no job, we gave her what we could to help her out. Then she had a baby, we helped there also. In desperation for a break from the stress at home and for some money to help my daughter and the baby I took a job filling in for girl who was going on maternity leave. Didn't think that it would last more than a couple of months if even that, or if I could even do it, my self confidence was nil. Never signed a contract and never knew how long they'd keep me. Pay not good. Very stupidly did not inform dwp. As things turned out they kept me on to cover for other staff taking leave. Girl I originally covered for had another maternity leave, and is due back next month.

In this period my husband has been getting £44 weekly Income support in addition to his Incapacity benefit. I have also been getting Carer's allowance - I hadn't checked this properly and thought that my husband was entitled to this for someone to help him out, now realise that the number of hours I work rules me out of claiming this. My daughter has been coming over if I'm working and we've been paying her fares, I take time off when he's too ill to leave with anyone else. In addition, I've been getting housing and CT benefit. I have been told that I could have been claiming Working Tax Credits and Child Tax Credits which would have covered this amount.

My boss has had a letter from DLA fraud investigation asking about me. I don't know what to do. I might not even have a job when the girl comes back.

Should I give up the job and wait for dwp to get in touch with me - my husband thinks it would go better for me if I was back as his full-time carer, that they might be less likely to prosecute?

Is it too late to stay in the job, come clean and change claims? Do I tell them how long I have been working and offer to repay overpayment? How long would they give me to repay? Would they still prosecute?

I am absolutely terrified of being hauled up in court. I am so ashamed and so worried about this, nerves are in shreds. If I get prosecuted I'd lose job anyway and would probably never get another at my age anyway even without a fraud conviction to boot. What would be the best thing to do to limit the damage?

Thanks in advance to anyone who can give me advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell the truth and dont cloud the issue with things you mention above.

your daughters situation and help is not relevent. neither is the low pay etc etc.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx i dont really think your blunt anwser is helping the op.They have come on here for help and advice.They have already said they feel ashamed and low pay etc etc is relevent.

 

They most likely would have had a entitlement to other benefits working tax credits for example.So that will have to be taken into account when working out the overpayment of benefit.

 

Hi first of all you will be ask to attend for a interview under caution.There is a few factors that will be taken in to account if you commit benefit fraud.What period of time the offence was commited over.Where you aware that you were doing something wrong?How much is the overpayment of benefit you have received.

 

Visit this website it gives lots of usefull information on benefit fraud.

advicenow.org.uk

 

After the interview under caution

 

If your interviewer thinks you may have committed fraud, they may then recommend to their legal department that they prosecute you. The legal section may not take the fraud section’s advice: before taking the case to court they need to be sure they have enough evidence to convince a court that you broke the law so that it is worth the time and money to take the case. It will rarely be enough to go to court and only produce what you said in an interview and hope that you will be found guilty.

What might they do after the interview?

 

After the interview (or if you don’t go to it) they could decide to:

00001326_One-1326.jpg

Do nothing more: this may be because they decide no fraud was committed, or it may be that they think the case would be too difficult or costly to prove.

Or, If they have enough evidence to take you to court they could do one of the following:

00001327_Two-1327.jpg

Prosecute you: this involves taking you to a magistrates' or a crown court. If you are found guilty they could fine you up to £5,000, or, in extreme cases they could send you to prison, (although this is very rare). If they think the case is serious enough they may decide to prosecute without giving you any other options to avoid it.

00001451_Three-1451.jpg

Or, agree not to prosecute you if you agree to accept either:

  • A penalty: You would have to pay a penalty of 30% of the amount of the overpayment (on top of paying back the overpayment).You could be offered a penalty for each benefit you were overpaid.

Before you accept: take advice, as a penalty could be pretty expensive – and might add up to more than what a court might fine you if they found you guilty.

If you accept a penalty, you can change your mind within 28 days.

  • A Formal Caution: You sign to say you agree you’ve committed fraud and they promise not to prosecute you for it. However, someone else can still prosecute you for a related offence (for example another benefit fraud), and it could be raised again if there is another case later.

Once you’ve signed to accept a formal caution you can't change your mind.

A formal caution isn’t given by the police and is not the same as having a criminal record. It is only recorded on the fraud section’s records and no-one else will be told about it unless you are prosecuted later for another fraud. A formal caution or a penalty should not show up on a Criminal Records Bureau check.

 

Always try to get advice before accepting or refusing a penalty or formal caution:

They should only offer these options if they believe they have enough evidence to prosecute, and not just to try and get you to ‘admit’ guilt. If you are considering accepting a penalty or formal caution, it can be useful to see a copy of your file (see the guide Step-by-step: preparing for an interview under caution in the menu on the right hand side) to see if they really do have a strong enough case that they could take to court. Refusing a penalty or caution doesn’t automatically mean they will prosecute and shouldn’t influence their decision about whether to do so. Nor does it mean that they have found you guilty: only a court can do that.

Remember that you might have to pay back any benefit that you have been overpaid, regardless of what happens to the fraud issue.

 

If they decide to drop the case, or if you refuse a penalty or formal caution, they should let you know as soon as possible what is going to happen. However, it could be a few months before you hear anything.

Still not heard?

 

It can be very unsettling not knowing whether the issue has been dropped or if the DWP/council is going to take action against you. If you want to know what’s going on you can just ask them. But if you’re worried about doing this, weigh up the pros and cons. What would you find most stressful: not knowing and fearing the worst or getting in touch and perhaps having to deal with negative consequences?

If you do decide that you want to know, an advice centre may be able to help you find out.

What about your benefits?

 

Your benefits should be paid as soon as the DWP/council decides what you are entitled to. You shouldn’t have to wait until the fraud issue is sorted out. See What about my benefits? in the menu on the right hand side for more information.

Even if the fraud section or a court decides you committed fraud, you should still get any benefit you claim and are entitled to. It is only if you are found guilty (by the court) of fraud more than once in three years that your benefits can be ‘sanctioned’, which means they may be reduced for up to 13 weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..we appear to have exp/work in the same field.

 

pers i would recommend not clouding the issue with the other [perhaps] relevent issues at this stage.

the investigating officer will not specifically be interested in excuses [however cruel that may sound].

they are insterested in the honest facts.

doing that will go more toward a brighter outcome, then i would think the other issues will be looked at , and, i'd even say suggested by the investigating officer.

contrary to pop belief, most are not out 'just' to nail people , they are there to help too.

 

take it one step at a time, but be truthful.

 

thats my best advice.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to whats above...

If you are offered an Ad Pen and refuse it, and you are prosecuted, your refusal of an Ad Pen is mentioned to the Magistrates.

Take legal advice.

However, i would say that it would be wise to tell the interviewer about your situation, as "socail factors" often come into consideration when considering what if any further action to take. The interviewing officer is to estbalsih the truth, and not to play judge and jury.

Contrary to popular belief they are not all out to trick you and make you life difficult.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know someone who was caught working whilst claiming carers allowance for his wife around 5 years ago - not sure what happened but dont think he was prosecuted. He had to repay all the money plus some sort of fine or compensation, but it was eventually taken out of his benefits at about £5 per week.

 

I think they did stop his carers for a while - but didn't touch his wife's DLA because this was completely seperate claim.

 

Just so you know that whilst it is very scary and stressful, it will get resolved and you won't have to pay it all back at once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

;)Hi i have already had an interview under caution and they are taking me to court.I appealed againts this as not true what they were saying.i have a lawyer on the case and is very worrying.The benefit agency have a group of fraud officers who investigate.You have been watched and it is possible you have been videoed leaving the house and followed to work place.Someone has made an allegation to them so its prob someone you know.The same thing happened to me they followed my ex husband to work and sent them letters asking when started and asked for photocopy of wage slip etc.You would be better claiming working tax credit and do it now and tell them when you started that you were unawear that it would effect your benefit and you will accept to pay the over payment back,act quickly before you get a letter saying they are coming to see you.Sorry this sounds the way it does its i have been there and still going through it the now and i would not wish it on anyone.They thought my ex was living with me .If i can help more please ask you will have to phone housing benefit aswell as i am getting taken to court from dwp and housing benefit.Hope this helps and you get it sorted.:???:;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have been for interview under caution, I was totally stressed out and what I had intended to say ie I have been working ect it all went haywire as they ask qus=estions.

They had my work details and I admitted it all and said I did'nt realise I was'nt entitled as I am a full time carer- claimin only carers allowance. But it is 6half years.

Phone and tell them you made a mistake and you want change claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try not to worry about it. In the interview, you will be in a room with someone from DWP and someone probably from your local council. Tell them everything you know, any evidence you have, co-operate with them. More than likely, you will end up just having to pay the money back. I don't believe you will get prosecuted or anything serious, just a caution (Which is not a Police caution) and have to pay the money back. As you are on benefits they will allow you time to pay either in full or installments. You will recieve confirmation of what the decision is a few weeks later, but remember, when you attend your interview, you are just seeing organ grinders. Help them out if they need it and they wont wind you up, they will see that you accept full responsibilty and it may have just been an accident.

 

Try not to worry about it. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...