Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I owe council tax ....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all - hope someone can help.

 

(if this isnt the right place to post this, grateful if someone would move it to relevant forum :) )

 

I owe council tax on a previous rented property which I moved out of in 2005 and didnt leave a forwarding address.

sometime in 2006/7, they found me at my current rented place (assuming from credit checks) and a started receiving letters from bailiffs etc.

I ignored the bailiff letters and subsequently, the debt got passed back to the council.

 

I wrote a letter to the council in late 2007 to explain i didnt have much money and could i pay back £100 a month. they didnt accept this as they wanted the full amount to be paid by the end of the council tax year (March), but were willing to accept £150 for the next 3 months and then review the account.

 

I made a payment of £150 in Oct 2007 and Nov 2007 (i have email receipts for these) I then didnt make any more payments as I was unable to afford to.

since then, the only correspondance i have received is a leaflet about 'naming and shaming' those who owe the council money, and that i would be put on this list.

 

From what I remember, they claim I owe about £1300 (for one years council tax) but I dont know if they amount includes any charges or fees etc which they added on.

 

As I am in process of buying a house with my partner, I would like to get this sorted out into some sort of payment plan so at least I wont have to worry about bailiffs knocking on the door etc.

 

What is the best way to go about this? With the payment of £300 already made, i owe about £1000 probably and am not in any position to pay anything more than £100 a month on this. As its already Sept, I am worried they wont accept this (like before) and want it all cleared by march again.

 

how do i go about finding out how much i really owe them and also, whether i have a liability order against me?

once i find out the amount, what is the best way to get them to agree to £100 a month as i really am struggling.

 

i would be grateful if anyone could offer any advice/insight into this.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would be inclined to pay what you can direct via internet banking.

then in a few months time, enquire what is outstanding.

 

many councils now have automated payment lines which tell you your balance, poss try that method?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have your account number any local office will tell you the balance. Write to them and ask for a breakdown of the account.

 

Did you look into any benefits you could have claimed or discounts?

 

As long as you are paying your current and subsequent monthly payments they should accept additional payments to clear the arrears.

 

They won't be happy to do this and will press for as much as they can get as soon as they can get it but if you make it clear that you can only offer £xx per month and are willing to set up a SO or DD that should satisfy them. Ask to speak to someone more senior if they are playing hardball.

 

Only offer what you can comfortably afford and on a £1000 it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest £50 p/m or less and negotiate from there. Alternatively you can send them an income and expenditure form to show your surplus income and what is affordable.

 

If the bailiffs were involved, and from what you have said, it is certain you will have had a liability order. Ask the council for a copy or send them an SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

since my orginal post, I have been busy with house buying and family issues so haven't had a chance to deal with this problem

 

today i received a letter from the council saying that the debt has been passed back to them from the bailiffs. they say i can stop a 'commital summons' being issued against me if i pay £464.81 immediately or send details of how i intend to pay (they will then consider my offer).

 

from my previous post, I thought I owed in the region of 1K. I am now confused as to how much I owe.

 

is the correct plan of action to contact them to find out once and for all the amount I owe? or should i just pay the amount they are asking for and hope they forget about the rest? ........... actually, thinking about it, thats a bit of a head in the sand attitude, i suppose they could always chase me again down the line.....

 

ok - i write them a letter asking for full amount owed before i offer a payment plan? will a normal letter do or should I SAR them?

 

i really wish it was just 400 odd i owed!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should accept a normal letter by rights, just ask them to confirm the amount owed. State that once you have received this you will sort out a payment that you can reasonably afford. It is sad but true that the majority of councils now pursue people even to them going down the route of the courts, even then the courts will only make a person pay what they can reasonably afford. All utilities, countil tax, mortgage etc., should come first before any other debts that you may owe.

 

I was unemployed earlier this year and applied to my local council for benefit, no problem, then I got another job told them about it as soon as I started the job, now some 6 months later I get my new bill for the rest of year 3 months at £95 pm month more than I was paying before. They won't let me pay this extra £285 over the next year even though it was their fault as I informed them when I started worked again. Just goes to show how useless a lot of the councils are.

 

SD

I have no legal training and any knowledge I possess is based on my own experiences

Previously on the forum as Diamond Girl but still having problems logging back in

Link to post
Share on other sites

can't see why you dont phone them

its not like a DCA, they are there to help you

might not look like it sometimes on here, but most of em are quite nice as long as you talk to them and tell them what is going on rather than stonewalling all the time.

 

have you actually paid anything since your last post or have you played head in sand again?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can't see why you dont phone them

its not like a DCA, they are there to help you

might not look like it sometimes on here, but most of em are quite nice as long as you talk to them and tell them what is going on rather than stonewalling all the time.

 

have you actually paid anything since your last post or have you played head in sand again?

 

dx

 

last time I spoke to them (admittedly in 2007) i had a very bad experience as the person i spoke to on the phone was condescending/judgemental and stated that unless i pay the WHOLE outstanding amount over the phone, they would not be able to help me. they advised me to write in to them if i wished to consider other payment options - which i did back then.

 

since my last post, i have not paid anything towards this debt as i cant afford to at the present moment in time.

 

i have decided to, as advised, write them a letter enclosing a copy of the letter they sent me to confirm the amount owed and then set up some sort of payment plan.

 

thanks to all your advice/support - will keep you updated :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...