Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Privilige car insurance renewal but no renewal notice, now claiming I owe them money.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year I had my car insurance with Privilige and had no problems. As with most things, coming up to renewal, I shopped around and found a good deal. As I received no renewal notice from privilige, I took up insurance with a different company.

 

A few days passed and I received a package from privilige saying insurance documents enclosed which I simply put back in the post box marked return to sender, not required. I did the same with 2 subsequent letters from them, again without opening them.

 

I then recieved another letter which my wife opened saying they had not been able to collect the premiums due and to ensure my bank details were correct.

 

I wrote back to them saying I had not recieved a renweal notice and had not agreed to renew my insurance with them and as such had returned all previous mail to them unopened.

 

This morning I returned from holiday to find a letter from them saying that basically I still owe them for 2 months premiums before the policy was cancelled and that if not paid they would send the matter to an ouside debt collection agency.

 

Im not worried about the debt collectors because I will simply tell them the amount is in dispute.

 

My main gripe is that without my express permission, Privilige has assumed I would like to carry on my insurance with them because I DID NOT tell them I didnt want it. I know insurance companies write and tell you on the renewal notice that if they do not hear from you they will carry on taking your money and your cover will continue.

I did not receive a renwal notice and as such did not have the opportunity to tell them to go take a walk.

I cancelled my policy by returning the documents unopened marked return to sender, not required as soon as they were recieved. The fact that one part of the company does not talk to another isnt really my problem.

 

So, what do I do? Privilige say the policy was in force untill the letter they recived from me expressly telling them it wasnt required and as such owe them 2 months premiums. Should I ignore it or contact them explaining exactly why I wont pay?

TIA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you took the policy out orignally were you advised that the policy would auto renew?

 

you confirmed that you received insurance documents but returned them unopened marked RTS and the subsequent letters. If renewal was not required werent you curious why they had sent 2 follow up letters? did you call them for your NCD for your new insurance?

 

Priv is owned by Direct Line,which is in turn owned by RBS, if you have insured with one of the their other companys i.e Churchill,LTSB,Direct Line, etc they will waive the outstanding as the business has still be retained even though you have left Priv

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will check original policy wording to see if it says anything about auto renewal....probably in the small print.

As with any mail I consider to be junk, I now just send it back at their expense for them to bin instead of me.

Sent copies of 2 previous renwals as proof of NCD and as the insurers can see when and how much claimed, they knew it was correct. Having said that, they told me they had recieved the documents and that all was ok but I soon got another letter saying I hadnt sent proof of NCD and my premium would be doubled! After a phone call, I was told that the documents had been received and all was OK. My second monthly payment went out and was double what it should have been so I rang again, to be told the same thing...documents had been recieved but my file hadnt been updated. Rang again to confirm and was told documents hadnt arrived!!!!! Long story short, in the end, I think they rang privilige themselves!

 

If there is nothing in my original policy about auto renewing, should I quote this and just say as I received no renwal I shouldnt have to pay as I didnt renew my contract with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar thing with my buildings & contents insurance that only ended up getting sorted when I complained to FOS.

 

The insurance co emailed me 2 days before my renewal to say they had sent out the renewal quote!

When I went to FOS (after getting DCA letters), lo & behold, the written quotes turned up - shame they didn't post them to me at the time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...