Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • hope everyone can see this (might be issues if not UK connection)   Post Office lawyer was a jack of all trades, but failed his own | ... WWW.COMPUTERWEEKLY.COM Post Office IT scandal inquiry hears how a lawyer was at the centre of the Post Office’s attempts to prevent problems with its IT system...  
    • as if a lawyer, let alone a senior one wouldn't have full documentation - if she claims she hasn't - claw back all the payments made to her   https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/post-office-inquiry-live-former-gc-susan-crichton-gives-evidence/5119453.article?clearcache=1
    • Id start by submitting a formal Subject Access Request to the local authority. State that you want all data including telephone recordings.   They'll have a month to provide you with the data and recordings then
    • a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF and have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's type most doorstepper threats are usually just that. however if you want a good giggle if they do turn up to collect your doorstep. get your phone. film them do not engage simply state leave my property now and never return else i'll call police 101. ideally you should have been reading up during this +18mts sage. then you'd already know. dx  
    • you do not need a sep accredited jewellers report..how stupid. stop believing things someone says face to face that they would never put in writing. the judge would eat them for breakfast if they did, dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rear-ended but 3rd party disputing liability


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sadly I had my first ever accident today after 5 years of driving. I feel I am not at fault but the 3rd party is disputing liability.

 

I was at a red traffic light at a pedestrian crossing in a small town. I was the first and only car stopped there. The lights turned green but at that moment a cat ran into the road so I stayed stationery until I could guarantee I could move off without hitting the cat. Then, Bang, I am hit from behind by a businessman in a black 4x4 who then comes up to my window, banging on it and swearing at me, the normal "who taught you to drive" crap.

 

I had had my foot on the brake the whole time, so my brake lights had been on the whole time and I checked later that they are both working. So he could clearly see I was stopped. He says I am in the wrong because it was a green light so I should have been moving and not stationery. I say he is in the wrong because he hit me from behind, simple as. Added to that, I was very clearly stationery, my brake lights were on and it was a straight piece of road and he could easily see me from a long distance behind so he had ample time to spot me and slow down. He thinks just because it was a green light, it is always safe to go and you should just blindly move off regardless of any hazards. The weather was cloudy so he can't say he couldn't see my brake lights in the sun.

 

I'm fairly (but nervously) sure the insurance companies will agree it's 100% his fault and not mine, but being in my 20s and him in his 50s and probably with years of experience and hundreds of thousands of miles of driving, I am aware he will probably (a) lie very cleverly about what happened, and (b) try to influence the decision of the insurers. And me being young, the insurer won't hesitate to give me a fault claim so they get more money. My word against his, they will obviously go with him, there's no doubt about that, that's just life.

 

The police weren't called because there were no injuries, and the other guy was in a rush and didn't want to stop other than to exchange details and to patronise me about how I should be in nappies rather than behind a wheel. There were no witnesses, but there is a shop right by the traffic lights. I went in there and asked if their camera covers the crossing and the nice lady said it does so if need be I could ask the police/insurer to look at the CCTV to prove my case.

 

So in short, do I have a chance at being 100% not to blame?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should think so, yes. I have always been taught that if you rear-end someone, it is ALWAYS your fault. He thought that you would have moved, but you hadn't, that's it tough luck and I suspect that he yelled at you all the more because he knows it too.

 

He didn't have enough visibility to see whether there were any reasons for you not to go, and he made an assumption based on the way HE would have reacted. If you have ever read Gridlock by Ben Elton, you'll know why this scenario sends shivers down my spine. :-(

 

Anyway, I digress. Stand firm, don't let him intimidate you and make it clear to your insurance that you may be young but that doesn't mean you will accept liability when you know you're 100% in the right, and remind them that you pay them to fight your corner.

 

I was unfortunate enough to have an accident like that a few years ago, where the person in front of me didn't pull out at a junction where there was LOADS of time to do so before the next car. :-( I assumed she would move, I started moving and BAM, hit her in the rear.

 

Never mind that through the momentum, I pushed her out onto the main road AND went though the give way too, and we both still had time to get through and then stop before the next car on the main road came through and didn't have to slow down :rolleyes:, and that she had plenty of time to go through and should have. As far as the insurance was concerned, this was 100% my fault, there are no extenuating circumstances in this type of cases.

 

Good luck and stand firm. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

176

You MUST NOT move forward over the white line when the red light is showing. Only go forward when the traffic lights are green if there is room for you to clear the junction safely or you are taking up a position to turn right.

 

ref: Road junctions (170-183) : Directgov - Travel and transport

 

(ignoring the bit about red lights)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom, I've dealt with motor claims for many years, and from your original post I would say that you are 100% blameless.

 

Absolute liability lies with the other driver, he has no defence and his insurers should accept liability without question.

 

Ignore all his rants at the scene of the accident, he was venting his anger at you for his own stupidity.

 

If you enocounter any resistance from his insurers post back here and we'll advise you how to deal with

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you hav'nt mentioned the extent of the damage to both vehicles.

 

As Mossycat says, you are not liable for this and with CCTV evidence, I would have reported the guy for driving without due care to the police. (You can report a driver for causing an accident as a result of a traffic offence, even if there are no injuries)

 

Anyway, get your estimate sorted, submit your claim to your insurers pointing out that you consider the third party liable (dont forget to mention the CCTV evidence) and as such you expect to recover all your un-insured losses (to include hiring a car while yours is being repaired).

 

If there is any dispute, write to the guy by recorded delivery stating that unless he settles your un-insured losses (excess, hire car ect) within 14 days, you will make an applictaion via the small claims court. You should include the line; 'I strongly advise you to forward a copy of this letter to your insurers'. Don't forget to keep a copy.

 

Keep us posted.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Thank you very much for your replies and good words, I really do appreciate it as I am a complete novice to accident/insurance protocol.

 

He hit me at about 10mph, as a result of which my boot doesn't open. I don't know what his damage is. There's a bit of a dent on my boot (his car was a lot higher than my Peugeot 306, as his is a 4x4) but I suspect there is some hidden damage underneath as often happens with rear-enders even at low speed.

 

Thanks for the advice, there are a lot of things you have all mentioned that I would have forgotten about myself, which I will mention on the claim form. I'll keep in touch, though I suspect I should be OK with the evidence:-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...