Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fixed Penalty Notice - Failure To Display Tax Disc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone advise please:)

 

Road tax expired on 31/8 and went to the car at 8.10am on 1/9 to put the new tax disc on (purchased on 19 Aug) to find a fixed penalty notice had been issued at 8.00am citing "Failure to Display valid tax".

 

As the the new disc can't be displayed before it becomes valid ie, the first of the month, then if we had put it on the car the night before then that could also be classed as "invalid".

 

The facts are............

 

1. I live in Edinburgh and the fixed penalty notice was issued by "Lothian & Borders" police but not by a police officer, a traffic warden of the old school "yellow band on hat variety"(as opposed to a "Council/Private Parking enforcement officer.)

 

2. The new tax disc was purchased over the counter at my local Post Office so the "5 days" rule does not apply as that only applies to road tax purchased online, by post or telephone.

 

3. The car was parked on the roadway, not on a drive.

 

My OH is not happy and says we should appeal and I appreciate that technically "failure to display" is correct so am tempted just to pay and leave it at that.

 

We live in a quiet residential street which is closed at one end with no through traffic. It is very narrow and on street parking is free which attracts cars from nearby areas which have controlled parking, that is why you can't always get a space near the house. I say this because it's not a street that usually attracts traffic wardens, I can't recall the last time I saw one!

 

It seems unfair that by supporting my local post office and buying the road tax in person I don't get the extra advantage of those buying online or by telephone.

 

I would hate to have a failed appeal and end up paying out more than the £60 penalty already issued but I don't know these things work?

 

Do you pay the penalty then appeal or if you don't pay does it go to court automatically?

 

My question is should I put this down to experience or it be worth appealing the fine?

 

Thanks in advancesmile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would appeal on the basis that you had purchased a VED and it seems unreasonable to serve you a PCN basd on that timing. I am not sure how, in law, this officially stands, but I can't see how anyone would uphold it in these circumstances.

 

On your point though, I am not sure why you think you can't display your new disk immediately. The disk only shows an "end date", not a "start date". I always install a new disk immediately on purchase, that way if a CEO observes it, I am showing a valid VED within date and if I go through a ANPR camera it is checking against the database, not "looking" at my disk. In future, if I were you, stick in the screen as soon as you get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Roxysiren,

 

A couple of corrections first - your new tax disc was valid from the day you bought it & could have been displayed at anytime up to the end of the month. There is no requirement to wait for the 1st day of the following month. With respect, you would not be expected to wait up until midnight of the last day of the month to affix the new disc.

Also paying for a tax disc online/telephone does not afford any advantages over doing so at a post office. There is no '5 day rule.' This is merely the period specified in receiving the disc following application.

 

Yes you have committed an offence in failing to display but by any stretch of the imgination to issue you with a FPN under the circumstances described is an extremely harsh & unreasonable decision on the part of the traffic warden.

I would have no hesitation in appealing, you have nothing to lose in doing so - after all they can only say no. Even then I personally would risk a hearing in court as I don't believe the PF would allow it to get that far.

Having said that, these are only my opinions - any action you take is of course your decision.

Appeal the FPN & see what develops.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no '5 day rule.' This is merely the period specified in receiving the disc following application.

 

 

There is a "5 day rule" meaning if you purchase online upto and including the last day of the month, you are allowed the 1st 5 days of the month to be displaying your old invalid disk whilst awaiting the arrival of your new disk by post. If you are issued an FPN during that time, evidence that you have purchased online will negate the FPN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crem, you are wrong there is no such thing, no grace period for displaying road tax no matter when you purchased it.

Roxysiren no harm in appealing, you never know your luck, it is the ones that dont pay at all they are after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crem, you are wrong there is no such thing, no grace period for displaying road tax no matter when you purchased it.

Roxysiren no harm in appealing, you never know your luck, it is the ones that dont pay at all they are after.

 

Sorry Raydetinu, you are incorrect:

 

If you prefer to tax in the last few days of the month, there is now an exemption from the offence of not displaying a tax disc. This exemption covers the first five working days of the month and allows time for the new disc to arrive in the post.

from Tax your vehicle online or by phone : Directgov - Motoring

 

 

and

The first of the changes has come about because DVLA has found that towards the end of the month, many motorists taxing their vehicle online or by phone do not complete the transaction when they realise that their tax disc may not be received in time for the 1st of the following month. As a result, from the 1st of September 2008, those buying their vehicle tax online, by phone or by post will be able to legally continue to drive their vehicles for up to 5 days while they wait for their new tax disc to arrive. This will only apply where the new tax disc has been applied for before the current one expires and motorists should continue to display the expired disc on their vehicle, until the new one arrives. This will be of great benefit to those motorists who have to leave buying their tax disc until the last day of the month, because they are waiting to be paid. They can now still do that, but also get the benefits of taxing online, by phone or by post.

from DVLA ? Improved Customer Service

 

 

It was implemented as an incentive to get people purchasing online I believe.

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does seem I am wrong applogies all round; also found this!

What About The 14 Days Grace?

 

If your vehicle licence has expired there is an understanding that you may continue to use the vehicle for up to 14 days. However you must apply for a new licence within the 14 day period and licence it from the expiry date of the previous licence. If proof that a complete application has been received at DVA, before taking a vehicle on the road, you will not be penalised for driving without a current Vehicle Licence or for failing to display one.

The 14 days period of grace is a concession. In law a current licence must be displayed at all times when the vehicle is on the road.

 

 

 

 

  • Services

 

 

chartermark_colour.jpg

©Crown Copyright 2006 / Disclaimer

doe.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does seem I am wrong applogies all round; also found this!

What About The 14 Days Grace?

 

 

That is why we have these discussions in an open forum rather than private messages so that we can all see the posts and comment on, or correct statements, where we feel necessary.

 

We all learn something new on these boards every day (well I do anyway) so I don't see that you have anything to appoligise for raydetinu

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is why we have these discussions in an open forum rather than private messages so that we can all see the posts and comment on, or correct statements, where we feel necessary.

 

We all learn something new on these boards every day (well I do anyway) so I don't see that you have anything to appoligise for raydetinu

 

I agree with this, I have been wrong several times and the beauty of an open forum is that there is usually someone to critique the advice given!

 

 

As for the OP, i'd be contesting this as you clearly had the tax disk and you replaced the old one with the new one ON THE DAY the new one started.

 

It sounds to me like some trafficwarden/etc. trying to make a quick catch to up their stats/commission/other incentive!

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your replies:)

 

Until this happened I have never considered displaying two discs at the same time, or to display the new one before the old one expires. Reading the information on the DVLA website that still appears to be incorrect:-

If your vehicle is taxed

You can apply from the 5th day of the month in which your current tax

disc runs out. Your new tax disc will come into force on the first day of

the next month and you should not display it on your vehicle until then.

 

It seems unfair that by supporting my local post office and buying the road tax in person I don't get the extra advantage of those buying online or by telephone if they happen to still be waiting for the new disc to arrive in the first few days of the month when technically they too are displaying an invalid tax disc.

 

The "14 Days Grace" article posted by raydetinu seems to be from Ireland so would not apply to Edinburgh.

 

I does seem I have suffered at the hands of an over zealous warden and feel I should appeal but am concerned if I failed that I would end up paying out more than the amount of the original penalty.

 

I am unsure if I appeal by sending a letter to the warden department or do I have to go directly to a court case.

 

Thanks :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "14 Days Grace" article posted by raydetinu seems to be from Ireland so would not apply to Edinburgh.

 

I does seem I have suffered at the hands of an over zealous warden and feel I should appeal but am concerned if I failed that I would end up paying out more than the amount of the original penalty.

 

I am unsure if I appeal by sending a letter to the warden department or do I have to go directly to a court case.

 

Thanks :)

 

 

 

The "14 day grace" period does appliy to England / Scotland, but as has been stated it is a courtesy rather than anything. You still are not allowed to use a vehicle without tax or a valid disc on the road.

 

Personally, I would be appealing this AND involving the local press.

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you there is no way I would take this FPN and "learn by it" or whatever.

 

I would submit an appeal asking for it to be revoked immediately and include the DVLA webpage showing that you shouldn't display it before it becomes valid. I would include proof of purchase and a photocopy of the VED disk as well. I cannot see any way that an adjudicator would support the issue of this fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as I started this, is there room on that naughty stool for two reydetinu?

Profuse apologies all round from me also & thanks crem & heliosfa for putting the record straight. This has come as a surprise to me & as you say crem, just goes to show you do learn something new every day.

 

Ok then, but how is this exemption/concession working out in practice?

How are wardens differentiating between vehicles displaying an expired VEL where a renewal has been purchased on line etc for one, and another where the renewal has been purchased at a post office? Are there any guidelines/codes of practice operating here?

 

It appears the OP would have received a FPN irrespective of the method used in purchasing the tax disc. I'm sure the traffic warden neither knew, checked nor cared whether a current VEL was in force, (albeit not displayed) nevermind how it was purchased.

 

What is the point of the exemption for tax purchased online etc, if the motoring public still run the risk of being issued with a FPN a second into the 1st day of the new month by over zealous wardens. Ok, the FPN can be quashed on appeal but what a cumbersome unnecessary hassle & inconvenience for all concerned.

If you purchase a tax disc online/by phone/by post & are issued with an FPN within the exempt period, it seems to me you may just as well totally ignore it as no prosecution should follow anyway - how many however would be willing to take that chance?

 

I now also understand & echo the OP's concerns at the discriminatory unfairness of this two-tier unjust system insofar as it relates to those purchasing tax discs at a post office.

 

A can buy his/her tax on line at the end of the month, display an expired disc with impunity up to 7 days into the new month & be exempt from prosecution.

B renews his/her tax disc half-way thro' the month of expiry at a post office, fails to display it on the 1st day of the new month for whatever reason, & is immediately penalised & liable for a £60 penalty. Just doesn't seem right somehow.

 

Roxysiren, I would most definately appeal -double underlined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On your point though, I am not sure why you think you can't display your new disk immediately. The disk only shows an "end date", not a "start date". I always install a new disk immediately on purchase, that way if a CEO observes it, I am showing a valid VED within date and if I go through a ANPR camera it is checking against the database, not "looking" at my disk. In future, if I were you, stick in the screen as soon as you get it.

 

Hmmm. You learn something new every day as I didn't think that was possible. Imagine the following scenario.

 

You buy a car Jan 1st with no VED disc.

 

You purchase 12 months of VED on lets say the 16th of January.

 

The end date on the disc is January 31st of the following year.

 

So you're basically saying you can display that disc immediately which ultimately gives you 12.5 months of VED for the price of 12????

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will pay from the first day of the current month, as there is no valid VED , system wont allow you to buy in advance, unless there is a current VED

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Joe Public, we cannot pay for a disk to start 1/2 way through a month, so as kiptower says, you would loose 1/2 a month if you bought it on the 16th rather than gaining 1/2 a month.

 

The exception to this is if you buy a new car on say the 25th, the dealership are able to pay for the additional days on a pro rata basis so that you new disk will run to the end of the next full month (next year)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the wave of selective postal strikes sweeping the country with reports of millions of letters stacked-up & people not having received mail for 10 days, I can't help but think of how this is affecting those who have applied online/by phone/by post to renew their tax & are still awaiting delivery of their discs. The DVLA exemption only allows for 5 working days to continue to display the expired VEL.

Can we trust the system to allow for the effects of the strikes & the wardens of this country (particularly in Edinburgh) to be sensible about this & perform the necessary checks before issuing FPNs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone!

 

Personally I find it incrediblly ridiculous that any official in their right mind would issue a ticket at 8am the morning after the old disc expired! Was the old disc still displayed at the time? I think any court would laugh this out the door if it gets that far but I think when you appeal it (as you most certainly should), then it wont.

 

Regards, Sam

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone!

 

Personally I find it incrediblly ridiculous that any official in their right mind would issue a ticket at 8am the morning after the old disc expired! Was the old disc still displayed at the time? I think any court would laugh this out the door if it gets that far but I think when you appeal it (as you most certainly should), then it wont.

 

Regards, Sam

 

 

Yes, the old disc was still displayed.

 

I have sent off my rquest for cancellation of the FPN and will report back on the outcome when I know.

 

Thank you all for your comments and advice and hopefully other people will find it helpful should they search with a similar question.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...