Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can i SD my local council?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Sorry this is a bit long but please bear with me

 

A few years ago i was made redundant & had to sign on & claim housing benefit.

Housing benefit was paid directly to my ex landlord, i then moved as i was offered a house with a very good housing association & i was still claiming HB [ new claim] .

 

Unbeknownst to me the HB was still being paid to my previous landlord, to cut a long story short they started taking " overpayment" monies from my HB & i had to make up the shortfall to the housing association.

 

When i found a new job, i agreed to pay them £30 per month but that soon got to be to much & they simply would`t except any lower payments, so i stopped paying.

 

Now there saying that there taking me to court for just over £600 & i`m not happy as i never had the money in the first place.

 

Can i SD them & are there any other options i have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like an administrative error where your ex landlord was in receipt of sums not due to him . When you fill out these housing benefit claims , you enter the dates you are at resident at these properties ? , they did not think to cancel payment to the landlord to an ex address you no longer used as an abode ? Why are they not chasing him ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the responsibility of the claimant to tell the council they are moving from the address for which they were claiming benefit. The council pay a landlord on behalf of the claimant - it is still benefit paid to the claimant and any overpayments are the claimants responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the responsibility of the claimant to tell the council they are moving from the address for which they were claiming benefit. The council pay a landlord on behalf of the claimant - it is still benefit paid to the claimant and any overpayments are the claimants responsibility.

 

Hi Pinky

 

I fully understand your point but when i made a new claim i gave my old address from where i was moving from. In addition if i had`t then i was committing fraud by claiming for two addresses.

 

I think its easier to pursue me than try & recover the payments from my ex landlord.

 

If there is any HB people on here could they give me some advice please.

 

Many thanks

 

Middxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know much about housing benefit , but from what I see , in between the time of your old application and the new , they were making payments to your old landlord , who was not entitled to these sums . And now they are chasing you for their ill allocation of sums to this person . I think there is another forum thread better dedicated to this kind of thing as opposed to general debt collectors , who could help you more . Do not worry , there are many here with experience in these kinds of misappropriations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know much about housing benefit , but from what I see , in between the time of your old application and the new , they were making payments to your old landlord , who was not entitled to these sums . And now they are chasing you for their ill allocation of sums to this person . I think there is another forum thread better dedicated to this kind of thing as opposed to general debt collectors , who could help you more . Do not worry , there are many here with experience in these kinds of misappropriations.

 

 

Thanks for the advice Drexl

 

They were actually paying both at the same time, could you point me in the right direction of the other forum thread.

 

thanks

 

Middxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not really an expert , you can see by my post count ) .

 

This would be a good place to go , by the look of it :

 

 

Local Authority, Council Tax and Business Rates Issues - The Consumer Forums

 

A mod could move the thread there , or maybe start a new .

 

 

Thanks Drexl

 

 

Could i ask any mods who drop by to move this to the section pasted above as i dont want to start 2 threads on the same question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can click that exclamation mark icon to get their attention . They may even find a better forum section for it to go to than the one I suggested .

 

 

I could if i knew where the feck it was:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Pinky states, it is ultimately your responsibilty to inform them when there is a change of circumstances which could affect your benefit. But I think you may have already, though not sure.

 

When you moved home, did you move to a different local authority area? Or was it within the same local authority area?

 

If it was within the same area, and you claimed as soon as you moved, then it's very likely it would be deemed as "administrative error" as they should cross reference the claim with your old address which you say you informed them of. They would have seen benefit was being paid and should have immediately placed a suspension on it. Very little can be done between the time you should have stopped receiving benefit and actually informing them, and they do have the right to take this money back, as far as I understand it. So if for example, you moved on 01/01/08 but didn't submit a new claim until 01/02/08 only the benefit paid from 01/02/08 could be written off, if at all. The payments made before that (from 01/01/08 to 31/01/08 ) can be recouped by them.

 

If you moved to a new local authority area and placed a new claim, without informing your previous local authority of the change, it could be considered fraudulent. (Yes, even though you have not gained financially from it)

 

They could not claim it back from the Landlord as the agreement is between you and them, even though it has been paid to him. They could ask him for it back but he can refuse.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Pinky states, it is ultimately your responsibilty to inform them when there is a change of circumstances which could affect your benefit. But I think you may have already, though not sure.

 

When you moved home, did you move to a different local authority area? Or was it within the same local authority area?

 

If it was within the same area, and you claimed as soon as you moved, then it's very likely it would be deemed as "administrative error" as they should cross reference the claim with your old address which you say you informed them of. They would have seen benefit was being paid and should have immediately placed a suspension on it. Very little can be done between the time you should have stopped receiving benefit and actually informing them, and they do have the right to take this money back, as far as I understand it. So if for example, you moved on 01/01/08 but didn't submit a new claim until 01/02/08 only the benefit paid from 01/02/08 could be written off, if at all. The payments made before that (from 01/01/08 to 31/01/08 ) can be recouped by them.

 

If you moved to a new local authority area and placed a new claim, without informing your previous local authority of the change, it could be considered fraudulent. (Yes, even though you have not gained financially from it)

 

They could not claim it back from the Landlord as the agreement is between you and them, even though it has been paid to him. They could ask him for it back but he can refuse.

 

It is the same council, i moved & started a fresh claim with my old address on the new forms, i also ended my JSA claim from the old address & they updated there files database almost immediately

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Pinky states, it is ultimately your responsibilty to inform them when there is a change of circumstances which could affect your benefit. But I think you may have already, though not sure.

 

When you moved home, did you move to a different local authority area? Or was it within the same local authority area?

 

If it was within the same area, and you claimed as soon as you moved, then it's very likely it would be deemed as "administrative error" as they should cross reference the claim with your old address which you say you informed them of. They would have seen benefit was being paid and should have immediately placed a suspension on it. Very little can be done between the time you should have stopped receiving benefit and actually informing them, and they do have the right to take this money back, as far as I understand it. So if for example, you moved on 01/01/08 but didn't submit a new claim until 01/02/08 only the benefit paid from 01/02/08 could be written off, if at all. The payments made before that (from 01/01/08 to 31/01/08 ) can be recouped by them.

 

If you moved to a new local authority area and placed a new claim, without informing your previous local authority of the change, it could be considered fraudulent. (Yes, even though you have not gained financially from it)

 

They could not claim it back from the Landlord as the agreement is between you and them, even though it has been paid to him. They could ask him for it back but he can refuse.

 

 

Hi folks

 

This may have moved to another thread but I will say it anyway - the rent can be claimed back from the Landlord if it is paid directly to them and in my area it most usually is!! As a Landlord one has to sign various bits and pieces, Landlords Declaration, Confirmation of Rent Charged etc etc and somewhere on those forms it states that rent can be reclaimed and therefore by signing the landlord is agreeing to be bound by the scheme!! It has happened to myself and other Landlords I know and we have been left out of pocket, normally due to someone losing their benefit and not telling anyone! I do not have one handy or I would post it up, but someone must have one or get a new form and look at the Landlord's page!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Just a further question regarding this thread.

 

Is an e-mail proof of contact?,

 

the reason i ask is i have deliberately decided on this route because i don't wish to speak directly to the person dealing with this case, i sent an

e-mail to the over payments department marked -FAO xxxx xxxxx [ BTW they are the head of department]

I have set out my case & asked for a confirmation of my e-mail, i`m playing for time as i intend to seek legal advice & wish to slow the process down.

 

Many thanks

 

Middxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...