Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Email or contact details for NatWest


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have you managed to obtain email addresses, direct telephone numbers or high level names of the NatWest Bank customer services department?

 

These details can save a great deal of time for people who are trying to claim and are attempting to penetrate these bureaucracies at a level where they can have meaningful contact.

 

We would like to post these details for others to use.

 

If you can let us have this information, please contact a moderator by PM.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make your Data Protection Act application direct to: -

 

Mr Alex Lyons

Data Protection Manager

Retail Regulatory Risk

2nd Floor

Business House B

GOGARBUREN

P.O.Box 1000

EDINBURGH EH12 1HQ

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

John Cunnane

Manager

Customer Relations Unit - Depot Code 040

225 Shenley Road, Borehamwood, WD6 1TE

External: 020 8236 8007

Internal: 4040 8007

Fax: 020 8236 8010

 

Nigel Owen

Media Relations Manager - NatWest

020 7672 1932 / 0776 642 0981

020 7672 1934

 

Caroline Harris 020 7 672 1931

 

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Phone 0131 626 1165

Fax 0131 626 3049

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everybody

 

I just joined today - Go to the TOP man at RBS & NATWEST - The Guy is

Sir Fred Goodwin Chairman & CEO of the RBS Group. He reads every

complaint letter himself - if the suits try to hide anything from him he

goes balistic ! and he is a trained lawyer.

 

Mary McCallum Personal Assistant to Sir Fred Goodwin

0131 523 2033

 

You will get prompt attention and satisfaction

 

Wilip Woy

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the address??

 

I'm having a poke about right now - and it's not easy to find one that says, "here's where to write to Fred". Quelle surprise....

 

But, that's a Glasgow number I think.

 

That said, I've found a registered address in Edinburgh..

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh,EH2 2YB

 

I want to ring that number and ask his assistant for their postcode - just to check - but I'm scared she'll ask me why and I'll bottle it!! :D

 

From http://www.citizenbanksucks.com I see :-

PO Box 31, 42 St Andrew Square Edinburgh EH2 2YE

 

But I take the point elsewhere on this forum that Nat West issues should be addressed to Nat West. But then.... letters to "Fred the Shredder" (as I've seen him referred to) is another avenue!

 

Sorry if this isn't much help, I'm trying to save people time (I hope) and show that pinning the CEO down isn't that easy.

But then again, what do I know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gogarburn

Edinburgh

EH12 1HQ

 

Thats the address.. Just called her...

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent my original DPA to the Edinburgh address (for credit card info, mind you) and reply came from this address:

 

Credit Card Operations

Regulatory Risk

PO Box 5636

Southend on Sea

SS99 1WJ

 

Tel No: 01702 371 316

Fax : 01702 278 409

 

and was signed by a Data Protection Officer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

just wanted to add another addy, Ive just issued my prelim approach to this address:

Natwest

Credit Management Services

1-3 Kendal court

Ironmasters way

Telford

TF3 4DT

 

I got the address off the woman i spoke to on the phone on friday when enquiring about charges..

xxxx

Abby acct 1, Preliminary approach letter issued 7/4/06

Natwest, result, full refund given, and more!!

T-Mobile, RESULT, refund given!!

DPA Request letter Abby, acct 2, issuing soon

 

Everythings Relative..(updated)Charges 'owed' to date = £225

One day the world will be fair... Maybe....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another useful contact for the same Customer Rerlations address at Shenley Road Borehamwood, may be STUART HIGLEY.

 

I have just received all 6 yrs worth of statements from his office, following my first letter requesting details of charges. Having picked through all statements and finding £965 in charges, I'm sending my second letter directly to him this time. Wish me luck!

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

All I did to get my statements was contact the CS department on 0845 6052605 I asked for 6 years of statements to be sent to me and the customer services representative arranged it over the phone so my statements are in the post (hopefully!!)

NatWest - £3750 - Settled

HSBC - £1100 - Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Aha!

 

135 Bishopsgate

London

EC2M 3UR

 

Registered office, according to an account transaction listing I got yesterday...

  • Confused 1

DPA Letter received by NatWest 11/04/2006

DPA Request expires 21/05/2006

Statements received 15/05/2006

LBA sent 15/05/2006

 

If you find me vaguely coherent, click the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When all else fails, you should look at the Information commissioners website for the definitive address to send DPA requests to. This is from THE Data Protection Register:

 

Registration Number: Z5619639

Date Registered: 03 August 2001 Registration Expires: 02 August 2006

 

Data Controller: THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC

Address:

36 ST ANDREW SQUARE

EDINBURGH

MIDLOTHIAN

EH2 2YB

 

also:

 

Registration Number: Z4936258

Date Registered: 06 October 2000 Registration Expires: 05 October 2006

 

Data Controller: NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC

Address:

135 BISHOPSGATE

LONDON

EC2M 3UR

 

These are the addresses that they have given the Information commissioner as addresses where DPA requests should be made, and so can be regarded as definitive for your purposes.

  • Confused 4

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

Just to keep you all updated I have just spoken to Sir Fred Goodwin's PA and she has given me email contact details for Michael Duncan- Sir Fred's right hand man!

 

Email for all RBS and Natwest cases- [email protected], apparently he looks at all complaint letter and will intervene if he sees it to be necessary.

 

Here goes.......:D

 

Thanks

Lena

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a bit of a search about along with a friend of mine in the legal business and came across the complete NatWest/RBS Directors list....The Ones in black have a standard service address, couldn't dig any deeper, but the ones in Red are their actual home address!!

 

 

 

Company Secretary

MILLER ROY MCLEAN

* ***** ******

*********

**** ***

 

Directors

 

ARCHIBALD SINCLAIR HUNTER

36 St Andrews Square

Edinburgh

EH2 2AD

 

ROBERT AVISSON SCOTT

***********

*********

******

*****

****

 

PETER DENIS SUTHERLAND

*************

*********

******

 

 

LAWRENCE KINGSBAKER FISH

* as Hunter

 

COLIN ALEXANDER MASON BUCHAN

* as Hunter

 

JAMES MCGILL CURRIE

* as Hunter

 

STEPHEN ARTHUR ROBSON

*********

*********

****

********

 

 

JOSEPH PATRICK MACHALE

* as Hunter

 

FREDERICK ANDERSON GOODWIN

**********

********

********

 

 

GORDON FRANCIS PELL

* as Hunter

 

THOMAS FULTON WILSON MCKILLOP

************

*********

*******

******

 

 

CHARLES JOHN KOCH

* as Hunter

 

JANIS CAROL KONG

*as Hunter

 

GUY ROBERT WHITTAKER

*as Hunter

 

WILLIAM MICHAEL FRIEDRICH

Eagle House

108-110 Jermyn Street

London

SW1Y 6RP

 

JOHN ALASTAIR NIGEL CAMERON

*as Hunter

 

MARK ANDREW FISHER

*as Hunter

 

I think we may have stumbled across a little piece of golddust?

 

===MODERATED===

SORRY, HOME ADDRESSES ARE A NO-NO.

===bandit's personal edit===

I had a black one when it should have been red....

 

oh well, was worth a try :)

08-05-06 - Data Protection Act sent to NW

08-05-06 - MP letter sent to Oliver Letwin (Cons, Dorset West)

25-05-06 - Statements and Data Protection Act received (14 days)

07-06-06 - Prelim letter sent to S.Higley claiming £1226.03

09-06-06 - LBA sent, due to negative response

29-06-06 - Claim served (Acknowledged 30-06-06)

27-07-06 - NW's Deadline - received 27-07-06

24-08-06 - AQ received and returned - Deadline 08-09-06 - Both returned

20-09-06 - 1st Offer - £850.00 with confidentiality REJECTED

05-10-06 - 2nd Offer - £1456.80 with confidentiality ACCEPTED

Link to post
Share on other sites

LolStevo

 

Send the DPA to

 

Mr Alex Lyons

Data Protection Manager

Retail Regulatory Risk

2nd Floor

Business House B

GOGARBUREN

P.O.Box 1000

EDINBURGH EH12 1HQ

 

and start a new thread so we can see how you get on :)

 

Bandit

08-05-06 - Data Protection Act sent to NW

08-05-06 - MP letter sent to Oliver Letwin (Cons, Dorset West)

25-05-06 - Statements and Data Protection Act received (14 days)

07-06-06 - Prelim letter sent to S.Higley claiming £1226.03

09-06-06 - LBA sent, due to negative response

29-06-06 - Claim served (Acknowledged 30-06-06)

27-07-06 - NW's Deadline - received 27-07-06

24-08-06 - AQ received and returned - Deadline 08-09-06 - Both returned

20-09-06 - 1st Offer - £850.00 with confidentiality REJECTED

05-10-06 - 2nd Offer - £1456.80 with confidentiality ACCEPTED

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You make the cheque payable to NatWest, and you send it, along with your DPA request letter, to Alex Lyons. His/her address can be found on this thread (on Page 2, I think).

  • Confused 1

DPA Letter received by NatWest 11/04/2006

DPA Request expires 21/05/2006

Statements received 15/05/2006

LBA sent 15/05/2006

 

If you find me vaguely coherent, click the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

Can anyone help? Im so confused to exactly where I send my letter asking back for charges to. I requested my statements over the telephone and got a standard letter from the customer care team whos address is

Customer lending centre

PO box 253

740 Waterside drive

Aztec west

Almondsbury

Bristol

BS99 1ET

 

Should I send it here or elsewhere???

 

many thanks

 

linz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

because i'm in debt recovery office hands i was given this number to ring and didnt get charged for the statements 01952206114.

it might help if youre in the same state as i am

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...