Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

I have had a letter demanding £480 in council tax from 2007 and despite ringing them up to offer £5 per fortnight from my income support they have refused my offer and say they will get a liability order to seize my goods !

I told them what was the point in adding further costs and not accepting my offer of payment when they clearly have seen my bank account details and proof of income support claim.

I am currently signed of from work by my doctor for severe depression and this issue is not helping my condition.

If this went to court and I attended to tell them I offered what i could afford but they refused would the judge rule this offer is fine ?

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are you talking too

is this council/bailiff/dca?

 

tbh: £10pcm will take 4 yrs.

but you must be able to get some help esp as on IS

 

are you getting ctax relief at present?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have thought they would have accepted the offer.Your proof of income support claim,are you getting it yet,or shortly going to.If they get tje liability order -more costs-then look at your circumstances,they surely will not receive anymore.Lets hope this is looked at again before the 7 days are up and your original offer is now accepted.My view only,good luck, Tawnyowl

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

An attachment of benefit will bring the council £3.25 per week guaranteed therefore its policy for most authorities not to accept less than this - most will accept £5 per week or so minimum as an alternative to a deduction of benefit.

 

Remember that they they don't have to set up a deduction if your on benefits - they can issue it to the bailiff instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a nice welcome letter this morning , a court date of 26 Aug to appear in Crewe with a further £50 costs added to bring it to £530 :evil:

The letter says I must give evidence why a liability order must not be issued.

Surely I showed my willingness to pay this bill just that I cant pay all at once , I made an offer being on income support for what I could afford.

What is the point of this when I showed them the proof of savings and income support claim , they already get my current council tax paid direct to them from my income support.

MAD AS HELL :evil::evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but surely these ****wits can see I am struggling like hell , surely when I go to court the judge will just order me to pay this bill by a reduction from my income support ?

Why do these people make it even harder for struggling people like myself by just adding more charges to make the burden even worse ?

I cant put into words how I feel about this and the w****r I spoke to on the phone cocky as hell saying he would ask to remove my goods instead of accepting my offer of payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but surely these ****wits can see I am struggling like hell , surely when I go to court the judge will just order me to pay this bill by a reduction from my income support ?

 

Your missing the point regarding the magistrates court appearance - the magistrate CANT order the council to accept any particular form of recovery , at this stage he merely awards the Liability Order on the basis that it was correctly issued to the liable person.

 

It would only be if the case reached the committal stage that the magistrate can order a payment arrangement.

 

CouncIl Tax is recovered by the criminal courts were the magistrate issues the Liability Order and the legislation then lets the council choose the recovery method themselves based on those allowed in the legislation.

 

If the council tax was recovered by the civil court (not the usual route used) then after a court judgment is granted then then council would have to apply to the court for a specific recovery method - something which does not happen under the standard council tax recovery via the magistrates court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically then I am screwed ?

The guy [edit] I spoke to on the phone said he would not accept my offer and would use the baliffs powers to seize my goods ! :evil:

So what the hell can I do after this liability order is automatically awarded to the council ?

No way anyone is coming into my house to take my goods this could turn into a very very nasty criminal offence as he wont touch anything again that dont belong to him I tell ya that !

Edited by steven4064
offesnsive word removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

tell you what i would do.....

 

firstly stop being so confrontational with these people

it will get you nowhere.

 

you have got to view it from their perspective. its now late 2009 , this debt is anything from 2-3yrs old depending upon how you look at.

its not looking very good to them is it?

 

as a side note: you weren't on benefits then were you?

 

i'd try and make things a bit better from youself. pay what you can weekly via internet banking, they can't refuse it that way & atleast it might shine some good light in the judges eye.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Small thought, if you are off sick with depression etc, do you get any other benefits related to your condition, you may be classed as in the vulnerable category and if so the bailiffs should return the case to the court/council for them to deal with and agree a payment plan.

 

Good luck and keep calm. Always be pleasant, it gets you much further!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a nice welcome letter this morning , a court date of 26 Aug to appear in Crewe with a further £50 costs added to bring it to £530 :evil:

The letter says I must give evidence why a liability order must not be issued.

Surely I showed my willingness to pay this bill just that I cant pay all at once , I made an offer being on income support for what I could afford.

What is the point of this when I showed them the proof of savings and income support claim , they already get my current council tax paid direct to them from my income support.

MAD AS HELL :evil::evil:

 

If you are in receipt of Income Support, this automatically passports you max Council Tax Benefit, so you should not be paying out of your IS for the present council tax. You should be in receipt of CTB and the money being deducted should go on your arrears!

 

Also, if you pay your £10 directly to the council regardless, that will go in your favour! If you had done that already you may have been able to dispute Court costs, if you kept your temper and had a sympathetic judge!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...