Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can you withdraw a car insurance claim ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was involved in a minor RTA where my wing mirror clipped a rear open door of a parked car. I thought its gonna go either as my fault and at the best it could go 50/50 because of the nature of the accident and the circumstances.

So asked the third party to get the quote for the repair and she came up with about £500 quote for a tiny dent on her door frame (which i think a competent DIYER can fix in 30 minutes without any trouble). The quote even had weather strips and all sorts of parts listed when the weatherstrip is no where near the dent. So i told her where to go.

But both of us have informed our insurance companies (which i think is the right thing).

Now i am wondering in either case (fault or split liability) is there a way i can reimburse the cost to the insurance company and keep/save my NCD or is it possible to cancel the claim and settle it privately.

I am in a total cloud of confusion as i have never come across anything like this.

Please Help !!:confused::confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do either, but I would suggest the best course of action is to let the insurer deal with it and you reimburse them. I never recommend settling privately - it leaves you open to all manner of problems.

 

You can't really "withdraw" the claim, as you are liable and so are your insurers. You can of course not claim for damages to your own vehicle, but the TP will be entitled to claim off your insurer irrespective of your wishes where there is liability on your part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your response!! :)

so how does this reimbursement process go. I mean the third party claims for the damage off my insurer and i pay my insurer and does that protect the NCD and is it worth reimbursing my insurer ? as in would my premiums be less affected if i reimburse my insurer or is it still gonna be the same difference ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not claim to be an expert on these matters but I do not see why you believe you are to blame. You obvously did not think - I know I will clip this open door.

 

It would appear to me that if you were driving along the road and someone either opened the door or left it open and unattended it would obviously not be secure. It could move for all sorts of reasons including car movement caused by wind or body movement with people alighting from the vehicle.

 

Therefore, unless you are convinced otherwise, I would let the insurers decide liability. Too many thoughtless drivers open doors in a dangerous manner and it would be interesting to know the ratio of claims blamed on the open door owner.

 

Pedross

If you think I have helped tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you pedross if i am found to be liable would reimbursing the cost make any difference to my No claims as in would it help to stop the premiums from going through the roof next year .. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your response!! :)

so how does this reimbursement process go. I mean the third party claims for the damage off my insurer and i pay my insurer and does that protect the NCD and is it worth reimbursing my insurer ? as in would my premiums be less affected if i reimburse my insurer or is it still gonna be the same difference ?

 

It's really a case of when the claim is finally settled, ask the insurer for the total cost. Then comes the difficult bit.

 

You have to balance the cost of the claim against the cost of losing NCD and the difference between the higher premiums over the next couple of years as a result. Unfortunately, premiums are only calculated a month or so in advance, so the insurer would not be able to tell you.

 

You could, as a rough guestimate, calculate your current premium and increase it by the appropriate amount, and do the same or next year. Not very scientific or accurate, but the best that can be done really.

 

A warning though. Claim costs can be prohibitively expensive for people to do this, so don't automatically assume that you will be able to pay the insurer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just on liability, you would not be liable if the TP opened the door in your path without giving you time to avoid. In any other case, you would be liable to some extent if not completely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...