Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Toasted v A & L

  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Toasted v A & L

    New to the site. Thanks for the info on this site, very useful. I was not made aware of the oft test case by the financial Ombudsmanicon last week when i complained. A and L have placed a default on my credit file for non payment of fees made up entirely of bank charges imposed on a dormant account . I have given them until monday to remove it or face court proceedings. Will keep you posted.


  2. #2
    Site Team maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    19,609

    Default Re: New here and in need of help!

    Hello and Welcome, Toasted.

    I'll move your post and mine to start a new threadicon for you in the A&L Forum.

    Regards.

    Scott.

    Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.
    If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

    If you can, please donate to this site.
    Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.


    If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    spoke to A&L this morning. They will not lift the default notice on my credit file despite the 'debt' being made up entirely of back charges. I have requested my data from them on the phone. Should i make this request by letter so i can prove it. They conveniently dont have an email.... My question is, i am ready to make an application to the court but will the courts make them remove the default until the test case is resolved? The banks have achieved a stay on claims, will the courts confer the same benefit to account holders who want a stay on defaults?
    Otherwise there doesnt seem much point in applying.


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    Forgot to say, they account has been closed by A&L and the 'Debts" written off. They wont even give me the opportunity to pay the disputed charges to clear the default (obviously on a without prejudiceicon basis) Experian have registered a 'disputed 'note to the entry, should i still write and put them on notice.?


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    I thought i would update you all. I am in communication with experian regarding their dissemination of wrong information on my credit file. it seems that section 13(6) of the Banking Codeicon does not apply to non default marks. My file is marked with 3+ late payment mark. However, as my late payments were in excess of 6 months, according to the information commisioners guidance, it must be marked as a default rather than a non default. its back with Experian for their further consideration..... I am cautiously optimistic...


  6. #6
    Site Team maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52 Authoritative maroondevo52's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    19,609

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    Keep us posted, good luck.

    Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.
    If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

    If you can, please donate to this site.
    Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.


    If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    It seems that some lenders are marking credit files with late payment markers rather than as a default, as this would prevent borrowers from getting protection under section 13(6) of the Banking Codeicon ie. that the matter is in dispute and should not be referred. If anyone is having this problem, get in touch, i may be able to help you.


  8. #8
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,441

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    Quote Originally Posted by toasted View Post
    It seems that some lenders are marking credit files with late payment markers rather than as a default, as this would prevent borrowers from getting protection under section 13(6) of the Banking Codeicon ie. that the matter is in dispute and should not be referred. If anyone is having this problem, get in touch, i may be able to help you.
    How?


  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    hi, do you have a non default mark against your credit file? how many months missed payments do you have?


  10. #10
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,441

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    Quote Originally Posted by toasted View Post
    hi, do you have a non default mark against your credit file? how many months missed payments do you have?
    0 and 0, but it was a strange comment to make that is why I asked the question how.


  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    because i have done a lot of research on non default marks against credit files which i can pass on to others in this situation. Not so strange perhaps.


  12. #12
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative yourbank Authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,441

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    Quote Originally Posted by toasted View Post
    because i have done a lot of research on non default marks against credit files which i can pass on to others in this situation. Not so strange perhaps.
    OK, cool, can you post it up?


  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    yes, but to just identify sources does not really help much when circumstances vary so much. Mainly from the Banking Codeicon - guidance for subscribers and cross referencing to the Information Commisioner's guidance, particularly with reference to what constitutes a 'default'.

    Happy to help anyone who might need specific info for their case.


  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    toasted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    SUCCESS! A and L have backed down and removed the three late payment markers following the service of my amended particulars of claim. They did this the day before their defence was due. My credit rating is now restored to its former glory.

    I obtained a lot of help and advice from this site and will be making a donationicon.

    Thanks to everyone.

    Toasty


  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    hilaryfrances Informative hilaryfrances Informative hilaryfrances Informative hilaryfrances Informative hilaryfrances's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    I live in Sin
    Posts
    801

    Default Re: Toasted v A & L

    congratulations



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE