Thread: Is this a legal default notice??

Following my recent CCA request to NEXT Plc, regarding a having not received an default notice in 2006, and they have provided me the following default notice.

Also, i have only just noticed that they have recorded at the top of the letter 29th June 2009, when the default refers to 2006.

Can anyone offer any advice?

is there any template letters that i can use to send them requesting that this is not a valid letter and the default should be removed?

I wrote to Next telling them this letter is nothing more than an arrears letter.

They have responded by saying that there is no requirements in the CCA to provide a certified copy of the default notice.

Can someone tell me if you have to be issued with a default notice for next to record data to the CRA?

NEXT are being complete idiots!

They sent me a letter saying that they have no signed credit agreement on file and they can not issue me with a copy.

They also advised that they are not aware under the cca that i default must be served, and they state that they have issued a default notice (above) and they do not have to provide evidence that it was delivered.

I have also questioned why they have send me a copy of the default notice with a current date. they advised, regrettably, they made an admin error and they reproduced the original copy and they forgot to change the date. I can i beleive this, for all i know they could have typed this letter up and tried to pass it off as a document they claim was issued in 2006.

I have complaint the fos ( who cant help me cos NEXT were not covered by them in 2006)

IFO - Said that i may have a case but they told me of the data is fact then under the DPA then it is correct information recorded.

Can anyone offer any advice for me?

Originally Posted by suzby83

NEXT are being complete idiots!

They sent me a letter saying that they have no signed credit agreement on file and they can not issue me with a copy.

They also advised that they are not aware under the cca that i default must be served, and they state that they have issued a default notice (above) and they do not have to provide evidence that it was delivered.

I have also questioned why they have send me a copy of the default notice with a current date. they advised, regrettably, they made an admin error and they reproduced the original copy and they forgot to change the date. I can i beleive this, for all i know they could have typed this letter up and tried to pass it off as a document they claim was issued in 2006.

I have complaint the fos ( who cant help me cos NEXT were not covered by them in 2006)

IFO - Said that i may have a case but they told me of the data is fact then under the DPA then it is correct information recorded.

Can anyone offer any advice for me?

Next are foolish in thinking that.
Technicaly it would be a gift, no agreement, they cannot enforce.
So hit them with the data protection act, go get them...

Trooper68