Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS Credit Card - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received my statements through the post this morning and they have only sent me statements since JUNE 2001..!! even though i asked for statetments since 7th June 2000.

 

The excuse given was that they were unable to trace copies of my statements prior to June 2001 as it "is possible your account may have been held under a different account number due to your card previously been lost or stolen. However, as your account is closed and no longer held on our computer system I am unable to check to see if this is the case"

 

I think what is really happening is that they are trying to pull the wool over my eyes as I reckon the majority of charges are between June 2000 and June 2001. They are correct though, I did report my card as lost around this time........but this shouldnt make any difference should it....???

 

Any adive on my next course of action

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to keep records for 6 years so this is wrong. Also, if you made the SAR in the correct way then they should give you all the information about you (the subject in the SAR) that they have back to 6 years ago.

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a LBA to them from the templates library, the one that you send if data is missing or inclomplete, i also sent a list of my previous addresses

 

I got a letter back from them basically saying that 'as your account is closed your records are no longer held on our computer system. I am therefore not able to confirm whether your account was held under a different number to that quoted above, prior to june 2001, to enable me to search our historic records'

 

i am stuck now, really dont know how to take this further..........any ideas!?!

 

the 40 days are still not up......18 days left

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby
I got a letter back from them basically saying that 'as your account is closed your records are no longer held on our computer system. I am therefore not able to confirm whether your account was held under a different number to that quoted above, prior to june 2001, to enable me to search our historic records'

 

I think that's complete rubbish! My account with RBS was closed some time in 2003. I was fortunate that I had all my statements but when I sent the prelim letter I got a phonecall to say that they would have to order my records, presumably from the basement :) . They duly obtained records of my account and then sent me the usual buzz-off letter. But they never even tried to tell me they would be unable to get them.

I think this is a case for a DPA non-compliance letter (templates in the Library. Template #1 is the one you need, I think) . And while you're waiting ;) highlight the charges you do have and do the spreadsheet. Then you can estimate the missing year's charges :D . If you overestimate and the bank disagrees with your figures they will have to provide the evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby
I will probably do that but i will wait the full 40days is over before i hit them with that letter.

 

OK, it's up to you of course, but I didn't mean the preliminary letter. The DPA non-compliance letter template #1 is when they don't provide the full information they hold on your account. They've already told you the info about your old account is not on the computer so they can't help you, so there's no point in waiting any longer! It's just another stalling tactic. I bet if you owed them money they could find your old account just like that :cool: after all they even mentioned 'historic records' so the info does exist and they could find it. Don't let them put you off any longer :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, it's up to you of course, but I didn't mean the preliminary letter. The DPA non-compliance letter template #1 is when they don't provide the full information they hold on your account. They've already told you the info about your old account is not on the computer so they can't help you, so there's no point in waiting any longer! It's just another stalling tactic. I bet if you owed them money they could find your old account just like that :cool: after all they even mentioned 'historic records' so the info does exist and they could find it. Don't let them put you off any longer :evil:

 

 

I have already sent them that letter, the reply they sent back is above.

Should I proceed with the claim now then and just estimate the costs?? Is there a time limit on me doing this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

Sorry, I obviously misunderstood/didn't read the post properly :oops:

 

Should I proceed with the claim now then and just estimate the costs?? Is there a time limit on me doing this?

 

Am I now right in thinking that you have sent a DPA non-compliance letter, a prelim letter and an LBA? If so, then yes go ahead with your claim. I can't see how else you are going to proceed unless you estimate the older charges, as the bank is declining to give you the necessary information. As to the time limit, do you mean the Statute of Limitations? Any charges older than 6 years are statute-barred but people are going after them as well - I think usually after they have got the 6-year ones back first! Oh, I am also assuming you're in England.

 

Good luck with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I obviously misunderstood/didn't read the post properly :oops:

 

 

 

Am I now right in thinking that you have sent a DPA non-compliance letter, a prelim letter and an LBA? If so, then yes go ahead with your claim. I can't see how else you are going to proceed unless you estimate the older charges, as the bank is declining to give you the necessary information. As to the time limit, do you mean the Statute of Limitations? Any charges older than 6 years are statute-barred but people are going after them as well - I think usually after they have got the 6-year ones back first! Oh, I am also assuming you're in England.

 

Good luck with your claim.

 

I have sent the prelim letter, the DPA non-compliance letter but NOT the final LBA letter.........should I send this off and give them 14days to reconsider their stance??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

Yes, I think sending the LBA would be the right thing to do then you've done everything by the book. They'll send you another 'we're right, you're wrong' letter then you can file your claim :)

Keep us posted :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...