Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Direct Line Home Insurance Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there

 

I started my home insurance policy in January with Direct Line and added my '69 American Fender Stratocaster Guitar to the policy. My dad acquired the guitar in the late 80s as a swap for a Manx Norton motorbike in bits. His intention was to learn guitar, but he never had the time, so it's been sat in the loft ever since.

 

I've played the thing a few times in the house, but when I moved back near my parents in December '08, he agreed that I could have the guitar and start using it for gigs with my band, obviously as long as it was insured.

 

When I contacted Direct Line to take out the policy, I explained there was no proof of purchase, which they said was fine and in the event of a claim we could seek a valuation from an expert.

 

At the end of February, the guitar was taken from outside a venue we playing at while we were loading up our van. I've contacted the police, who have advised that CCTV on the high street was pointed the opposite way during the theft. The venue's CCTV does not cover the area where the van was parked for load up, so we've got no idea what happened at all.

 

Direct Line sent out a claims representative from UK Assistance, on their behalf, who says he requires documentation for the guitar. There isn't any as initially explained to the Direct Line sales person. All I have is the serial number. I don't have pictures of it as it has been sat in the loft for countless years.

 

In the end, he has asked for a signed letter from my dad to confirm he was the owner of the guitar and has given it to me.

 

This has got both myself and my dad a bit worried that if he writes this letter and they decide to reject our claim, or say it was fraud, because we cannot substantiate the guitar existed, bar the serial number, we are both going to be in trouble.

 

We really don't know what to do for the best. The guitar is worth at least £8,000 and it seems a hell of a lot to lose.

 

Any advise would be most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing is to put a complaint in writing straight away to DL.

 

Explain what you have explained here, giving dates of telephone calls, names of people you have spoken to etc where possible.

 

On the basis of what you have said, they should be able to obtain recordings of the calls and would not be able to refuse to accept liability, as they have accepted the cover on the terms you have stated. Also, the insurer cannot refuse to pay out on the basis of a lack of paperwork. Incidentally, photos may help or signed witness statements from anyone who has seen you with the guitar (from people such as a club owner or organiser - statements from friends will not carry much weight). I would also have the letter from your father drawn up. Fraud is a serious accusation and the insurer will need to have good evidence of this.

 

But whatever you do, do not speak over the phone because insurance staff are more concerned with hitting their targets than properly dealing with complaints. Whilst dealing with letters is little better, it's easier when complaining to the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

I was drafting my letter to Direct Line, but I have just received a rather unpleasant, and quite rude, telephone call from them.

 

A woman from the Claims Validation team called me to go over the facts and try and catch me out on anything she could! A rather unscrupulous tactic which needless to say failed. Anyway, we got back onto the proof of ownership thing, which is proving especially difficult for me as I have nothing bar a serial number, which does determine date. The CCTV in the venue shows the guitar leaving in its case, but this is not enough to establish it's value apparently.

 

I advised I could go to any number of experts and gain written valuations based on what I know about the guitar and its condition. Apparently, the valuation should have been done before the theft and getting a valuation on a like for like does not prove ownership.

 

I've been through the terms a million times and I'm getting more and more confused.

 

The call was verging on them calling me a liar, which I cannot abide. I really won't let this lie, but don't know how to proceed.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLs claims validation teams are used where there is theft. Alas, the staff who work there are sourced from sales, credit and sometimes even claims, but have little or no knowledge of insurance. They also seem to think that it is their own personal money that will be used to pay out.

 

Staff are also poorly selected as, as you have seen, they do not have the correct training or tact to deal with these things, often making it personal and treat their job as some vindictive pen pushing bureaucrats.

 

But do not worry. Though the validation is used to try and detect fraud (and they usually fail), it is also used as a more indepth claims notification.

 

If necessary, go to a valuers. Have you any photos?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As to how to proceed, simply give a full written statement.

Obtain statements from independant third parties. A club owner for example could say that you play at their premesis with the guitar.

Provide detailed descriptions of the guitar, colour, marks, style, material etc.

 

Read my first post on here and follow that advice and see where it goes. You will get nowhere by fretting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If you gave a time deadline, then as soon as it passes.

 

If it was a complaint, then once 5 days have passed - but not to Direct Line. In such a case, you will be able to take it to the FOS. DL will not be able to say "oh it was not a complaint" because their own definition of one is "an expression of disatisfaction in whatever form whether stated as being a complaint or not". Being busy, lost the complaint etc are not valid excuses.

 

Two things NOT to do:

1. Speak on the phone. If they call, insist it is put in writing, even if they are accepting your claim. Do not enter into any discussion into any depth at all - just say "put it in writing please" and repeat until you / they put the phone down or they agree.

2. Fail to back up any threatened action. If you have said you will go to the FOS / sue, then do it. Otherwise, you will be seen as a walkover and they will not take you seriously.

 

But I think the FOS is your next port of call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome. I had lots of customer saying the same thing when I worked at DL - I'm a star, wished there were more people like me, why couldn't someone just do that in the first place etc etc. Made me feel that I was doing a good job - until the team leader came over with the stats and started moaning about all the targets I missed (time on/off phone, money I paid out etc). That's why I always say put it in writing. Staff are more interested in hitting targets than helping customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...