Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N55 Notice of application for attachment of earnings order, Help Pretty Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Cliff notes version leading to my question

I received a CCJ for a credit card debt which had been sold to a firm called FV-1, INC, The Corporation Trust Company. these are the claimant's who acquired the CCJ against me a year ago. I didn't defend it as I new nothing then and hadn't discovered CAG.

 

The claim, CCJ was for only a small part of the debt £315.00 which they sated on the claim form was for part of a debt assigned to them.

I have since found out from CAG that this is actually unlawful for them to do so,this is set out in section35 of the County Courts Act 1984 which can be found here. County Courts Act 1984 (c. 2:cool: - Statute Law Database

 

I sent I & E to them as soon as I received the claim with an offer to pay sent it to FV-1 as that is who it said to send it to on the claim form. I heard nothing from them, but then received the CCJ and it was to pay forthwith.

I wrote to the court explaining every thing as soon as I received the CCJ and enclosed my I & E along with wage slip. The court replied saying I had to pay a fee to get the CCJ amount set to installments, I had been told that if I responded with in 14 days there was no fee. Any way obviously this info was wrong.

I never paid fee for redetermination.

I never heard a thing for a whole year until last Thurs. when I received a N55

This leads me to my main question..............

I have read loads of times on here that a spouse is not liable for the others consumer debt. This debt is soley mine and has nothing to do with my husband.

I would like to get this debt set to an affordable installment and to ask that they suspend the order and give me a chance to pay rather than taking it from my wages, there is a tiny space on the form to do this.

This is what i am unsure of.................

I have to get this form posted to court this Monday to be on the safe side.

It asks for my I & E and a recent wage slip.

I only work part time and my hubby works full time, we have two children,

If my hubby is not liable to pay my debt then do I just write down what I pay for and what I earn and make an offer of payment, and then write that my hubby pays for all the other expenses or do I have to include his income along with his outgoings and send a wage slip of his too.

ON THE FORM IT ASKS FOR " MY HUSBAND OR WIFES USUAL TAKE HOME PAY"

 

I hope I have explained OK, I really don't know what way to fill this in as I have tried to explain above.

Any thoughts, help would be really appreciated.

cheers Q., x

Edited by questioning
Added text at the beginning.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think (and I'm happy to be corrected) that if the credit card was applied for solely in your name and issued based solely on your income then I would say that only your income and expenditure should be considered when asking for payment terms.

 

It could be viewed that the part of the form asking for husband or wife's income should only be completed where there is a joint debt.

 

As you say, there is only a small box on the form to put your reason for asking for suspension - however, if you need to explain in more detail (i.e. it would be detrimental to your employment status, or that you had already offered a an installment offer but was ignored) then you should write in the box "please see affixed sheet" then you need to write the claim number and your name at the top of the sheet and affix it to the form. Don't forget to keep a copy of everything and send by recorded or special delivery.

 

There is of course the possibility of having the CCJ set aside due to the fact that the claim was issued for only part of the claim - this would involve a fee of £75.00 and is applied for on a different form. However, the other way of looking at it is this - if you pay the £315 then no-one can come back to you for the remainder as the claim will have been satisfied. How much is the whole debt?

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly Ellen you are so kind to reply sp speedily, many many thanks.

 

I actually was givren the card years back when I didn't even work and it was only in my name my hubby didn't know I was applying for it. I applied in bank as I kept going in to pay an argos card balance and the cashiers kept saying take our card and tranfer balance it will be cheeper. so hubby certainly wasn't aware until I told him I had one.

I suppose they linked me with my hubby and he was working and still is.

 

I did think perhaps the part which says husbands or wifes income could just be for joint claims.

 

I wondered weather it would be best to include hubbies income and expenses but send no wage slip of his and write that this is where our money goes and as this debt is just mine my husband did not want me sending his wage slip but out of our combined surplus I will offer part of it, as my hubby isn't liable for my debt, OR to just do as previously stated and not include hubby for same reason and say this is where my income goes and offer £ 10.00 a month, I don't earn much, it all goes on living exspenses any way. If I did include hubbies wage then it would probably end up as a $10 :wink: a month offer any way, and that is us being generous.

 

The debt on the card was a couple of thousand so yes, if I get this paid then the CCJ will be satisfied, so if they came back for more it would be a case of "res judicata". Bryan carter did the same with a debt of my hubbies, we paid this to bailiffs as we again couldn't affortd the £50 a month set by court, then received confirmation that the CCj was Satisfied, Carter then asked for the balance remaining, We said the CCJ has been paid, You are not getting any more and never heard another thing. that was over a year ago now.

This company seem to run in a similar way to Bryan Carter sols.

Edited by questioning
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, if you would only end up with £10 surplus to offer by taking joint income into consideration then you will be at no disadvantage by doing that. You should only send in your wage slip - after all it's only your debt.

Keep the information on the sheet you are attaching concise and to the point, no need to mention that your husband doesn't want his wage slip sent in.

 

When you fill in the income and expenditure part of the form, make sure the £10 per month you are offering is what is all that is left over after everything else has been paid. Take a photocopy of all of it before sending in to court.

 

Ell

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Ell_en,

I think that would be the best as if I left out my hubbies wages it would look like I was trying to hide something. I really just want this payment accepted and to pay it.

I will keep the info to the point, they don't want my life story i know.

Do you have any idea if these forms once completed are successful?

 

 

i cannot find any cases the same as mine where any one has just sent off there income and not included there spouses. I've searched this forum but can't find any account of this.

 

Cheers Q.x.

 

Thanks for your message Ell-enn. you are a star.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks

My main concern is to get this CCj paid off by installments, as they have only sued for part of the debt, once this is satisfied I could then fight them off hopefully if they tried to get the rest.

Edited by questioning
added some text.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Noticed this N55 form says In the Expenses column Do not include any payments made by other members of the household out of their own income.

I understand this to mean only include what expenses I pay from my income.

I think I'll have to ring the court about this.

I'll post back what the court says as it may help others who are in the same boat as me.

It would certainly be easier for me if I did only have to include my income and outgoings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can some one have a look at this post please and tell me what they think?

 

I phoned the court the girl didn't have a clue.

She read the form and then said do as it says on the form, which is .........

Include the spouses income as it asks you to and money anyone else contributes to the household, if applicable,

then in the expenses part only put my expenses down and then I could just write that all other expenses that I don't pay for are paid by my husband out of his income.

 

I do not include hubbies wage slip.

I must admit my OH does not want his details recorded on this form as it is not his debt.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about electricity and gas? Typically these would be around £100 per month.

Also what about children's school trips etc.

What about TV licence?

What about car expenses, MOT, Insurance, Tax?

If no car then what about transport expenses?

Edited by palomino

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also look at this http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/pdf/personal-budget-sheet/pbs-monthly.pdf.

 

This gives you a template to complete which ensures you don't miss anything.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Palomino,

Yes I have looked at the link, thanks

These are my expenses from my wages, child benifit and child tax credit, these two benefits I collect and pay out as our living expenses.

My husbands expenses are not included as this CCJ debt is mine, It is not my husbands debt.

They want me to list my expenses from my income.

The things you mention are what my husband pays which are why they are not included.

I have heard the court is strict, which is why i would love comments from others before sending this form off.

Thanks

CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON MY POST #9 PLEASE, THAnks

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to update. might be helpful to someone wondering the same things as i was.........

I did fill the N56 out correctly.

It did mean my hubbys wage my wage & benifits, (if any)

BUT I only had to list expenses what I paid out for, I sent a covering note saying this is where my money goes and all other household expenses that I haven't listed is because my hubby pays them.

I asked for order to be suspended and it came back as 'agreed to suspend the AOE's' and I am 'ordered to pay £5. a month'.

Great result and all I have to do now is contact the DCA so i can set up a standing order so that they can't turn round and say they haven't received my posted payment.

They could appeal against this order within 16 days but I can't see the point as I only work 14 hrs a week, so earn a small wage and you "can't get the knickers of a bare arse" :wink::lol: :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ARE ther any charges on the credit card that you can reclaim?

 

Probably not many, I'm not really bothered about trying to re claim charges as they have sued for only a minute part of the debt. It will take me a few years to pay this CCJ at £5. a month, even if they applied to raise the monthly payments at a later stage they won't get much of a result. After this has been satisfied they will have to sue me again, in which case it will be defended as outlined in my first post.

I will be sending a CCA request to them though....;) it might prove to be fruitful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...