Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N55 Notice of application for attachment of earnings order, Help Pretty Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Cliff notes version leading to my question

I received a CCJ for a credit card debt which had been sold to a firm called FV-1, INC, The Corporation Trust Company. these are the claimant's who acquired the CCJ against me a year ago. I didn't defend it as I new nothing then and hadn't discovered CAG.

 

The claim, CCJ was for only a small part of the debt £315.00 which they sated on the claim form was for part of a debt assigned to them.

I have since found out from CAG that this is actually unlawful for them to do so,this is set out in section35 of the County Courts Act 1984 which can be found here. County Courts Act 1984 (c. 2:cool: - Statute Law Database

 

I sent I & E to them as soon as I received the claim with an offer to pay sent it to FV-1 as that is who it said to send it to on the claim form. I heard nothing from them, but then received the CCJ and it was to pay forthwith.

I wrote to the court explaining every thing as soon as I received the CCJ and enclosed my I & E along with wage slip. The court replied saying I had to pay a fee to get the CCJ amount set to installments, I had been told that if I responded with in 14 days there was no fee. Any way obviously this info was wrong.

I never paid fee for redetermination.

I never heard a thing for a whole year until last Thurs. when I received a N55

This leads me to my main question..............

I have read loads of times on here that a spouse is not liable for the others consumer debt. This debt is soley mine and has nothing to do with my husband.

I would like to get this debt set to an affordable installment and to ask that they suspend the order and give me a chance to pay rather than taking it from my wages, there is a tiny space on the form to do this.

This is what i am unsure of.................

I have to get this form posted to court this Monday to be on the safe side.

It asks for my I & E and a recent wage slip.

I only work part time and my hubby works full time, we have two children,

If my hubby is not liable to pay my debt then do I just write down what I pay for and what I earn and make an offer of payment, and then write that my hubby pays for all the other expenses or do I have to include his income along with his outgoings and send a wage slip of his too.

ON THE FORM IT ASKS FOR " MY HUSBAND OR WIFES USUAL TAKE HOME PAY"

 

I hope I have explained OK, I really don't know what way to fill this in as I have tried to explain above.

Any thoughts, help would be really appreciated.

cheers Q., x

Edited by questioning
Added text at the beginning.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think (and I'm happy to be corrected) that if the credit card was applied for solely in your name and issued based solely on your income then I would say that only your income and expenditure should be considered when asking for payment terms.

 

It could be viewed that the part of the form asking for husband or wife's income should only be completed where there is a joint debt.

 

As you say, there is only a small box on the form to put your reason for asking for suspension - however, if you need to explain in more detail (i.e. it would be detrimental to your employment status, or that you had already offered a an installment offer but was ignored) then you should write in the box "please see affixed sheet" then you need to write the claim number and your name at the top of the sheet and affix it to the form. Don't forget to keep a copy of everything and send by recorded or special delivery.

 

There is of course the possibility of having the CCJ set aside due to the fact that the claim was issued for only part of the claim - this would involve a fee of £75.00 and is applied for on a different form. However, the other way of looking at it is this - if you pay the £315 then no-one can come back to you for the remainder as the claim will have been satisfied. How much is the whole debt?

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly Ellen you are so kind to reply sp speedily, many many thanks.

 

I actually was givren the card years back when I didn't even work and it was only in my name my hubby didn't know I was applying for it. I applied in bank as I kept going in to pay an argos card balance and the cashiers kept saying take our card and tranfer balance it will be cheeper. so hubby certainly wasn't aware until I told him I had one.

I suppose they linked me with my hubby and he was working and still is.

 

I did think perhaps the part which says husbands or wifes income could just be for joint claims.

 

I wondered weather it would be best to include hubbies income and expenses but send no wage slip of his and write that this is where our money goes and as this debt is just mine my husband did not want me sending his wage slip but out of our combined surplus I will offer part of it, as my hubby isn't liable for my debt, OR to just do as previously stated and not include hubby for same reason and say this is where my income goes and offer £ 10.00 a month, I don't earn much, it all goes on living exspenses any way. If I did include hubbies wage then it would probably end up as a $10 :wink: a month offer any way, and that is us being generous.

 

The debt on the card was a couple of thousand so yes, if I get this paid then the CCJ will be satisfied, so if they came back for more it would be a case of "res judicata". Bryan carter did the same with a debt of my hubbies, we paid this to bailiffs as we again couldn't affortd the £50 a month set by court, then received confirmation that the CCj was Satisfied, Carter then asked for the balance remaining, We said the CCJ has been paid, You are not getting any more and never heard another thing. that was over a year ago now.

This company seem to run in a similar way to Bryan Carter sols.

Edited by questioning
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, if you would only end up with £10 surplus to offer by taking joint income into consideration then you will be at no disadvantage by doing that. You should only send in your wage slip - after all it's only your debt.

Keep the information on the sheet you are attaching concise and to the point, no need to mention that your husband doesn't want his wage slip sent in.

 

When you fill in the income and expenditure part of the form, make sure the £10 per month you are offering is what is all that is left over after everything else has been paid. Take a photocopy of all of it before sending in to court.

 

Ell

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Ell_en,

I think that would be the best as if I left out my hubbies wages it would look like I was trying to hide something. I really just want this payment accepted and to pay it.

I will keep the info to the point, they don't want my life story i know.

Do you have any idea if these forms once completed are successful?

 

 

i cannot find any cases the same as mine where any one has just sent off there income and not included there spouses. I've searched this forum but can't find any account of this.

 

Cheers Q.x.

 

Thanks for your message Ell-enn. you are a star.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks

My main concern is to get this CCj paid off by installments, as they have only sued for part of the debt, once this is satisfied I could then fight them off hopefully if they tried to get the rest.

Edited by questioning
added some text.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Noticed this N55 form says In the Expenses column Do not include any payments made by other members of the household out of their own income.

I understand this to mean only include what expenses I pay from my income.

I think I'll have to ring the court about this.

I'll post back what the court says as it may help others who are in the same boat as me.

It would certainly be easier for me if I did only have to include my income and outgoings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can some one have a look at this post please and tell me what they think?

 

I phoned the court the girl didn't have a clue.

She read the form and then said do as it says on the form, which is .........

Include the spouses income as it asks you to and money anyone else contributes to the household, if applicable,

then in the expenses part only put my expenses down and then I could just write that all other expenses that I don't pay for are paid by my husband out of his income.

 

I do not include hubbies wage slip.

I must admit my OH does not want his details recorded on this form as it is not his debt.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about electricity and gas? Typically these would be around £100 per month.

Also what about children's school trips etc.

What about TV licence?

What about car expenses, MOT, Insurance, Tax?

If no car then what about transport expenses?

Edited by palomino

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also look at this http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/pdf/personal-budget-sheet/pbs-monthly.pdf.

 

This gives you a template to complete which ensures you don't miss anything.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Palomino,

Yes I have looked at the link, thanks

These are my expenses from my wages, child benifit and child tax credit, these two benefits I collect and pay out as our living expenses.

My husbands expenses are not included as this CCJ debt is mine, It is not my husbands debt.

They want me to list my expenses from my income.

The things you mention are what my husband pays which are why they are not included.

I have heard the court is strict, which is why i would love comments from others before sending this form off.

Thanks

CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON MY POST #9 PLEASE, THAnks

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to update. might be helpful to someone wondering the same things as i was.........

I did fill the N56 out correctly.

It did mean my hubbys wage my wage & benifits, (if any)

BUT I only had to list expenses what I paid out for, I sent a covering note saying this is where my money goes and all other household expenses that I haven't listed is because my hubby pays them.

I asked for order to be suspended and it came back as 'agreed to suspend the AOE's' and I am 'ordered to pay £5. a month'.

Great result and all I have to do now is contact the DCA so i can set up a standing order so that they can't turn round and say they haven't received my posted payment.

They could appeal against this order within 16 days but I can't see the point as I only work 14 hrs a week, so earn a small wage and you "can't get the knickers of a bare arse" :wink::lol: :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ARE ther any charges on the credit card that you can reclaim?

 

Probably not many, I'm not really bothered about trying to re claim charges as they have sued for only a minute part of the debt. It will take me a few years to pay this CCJ at £5. a month, even if they applied to raise the monthly payments at a later stage they won't get much of a result. After this has been satisfied they will have to sue me again, in which case it will be defended as outlined in my first post.

I will be sending a CCA request to them though....;) it might prove to be fruitful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...